VQ-1 History
Circa 2010
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...New leadership comes to VQ-1 - CDR Cory Howes - By LT(jg) Keith Ferrell - VQ-1 - Thursday, May 20, 2010..." WebSite: NorthWest Navigator http://www.northwestnavigator.com/ [21MAY2010]
The command the VQ-1 World Watchers changes today as Cmdr. Cory Howes steps in for Cmdr. Mike Giannetti, who has commanded the EP-3 aircraft squadron since May 2009.
Giannetti’s vision and guidance led VQ-1 to achieve the highest Navy and squadron goals. Of note, World Watchers executed a 100 percent operational sortie completion rate, several consecutive months of 100 percent pilot proficiency training, awarded the 2009 Battle “E” award, received the 2009 Golden Anchor Award for retention, and received the 2009 Blue “M” Award for medical readiness.
VQ-1 performed over 4,535 mishap-free flight hours while continuously deployed all 12 months of Giannetti’s tenure, flying missions in 5th and 7th Fleets to include Operations Iraqi Freedom and Ensuring Freedom in Afghanistan, and the Struggle Against
© 2010 Sound Publishing, Inc.
A BIT OF HISTORY:  VQ-1 History "...Volunteering Makes VQ-1 a Stronger Force By LT(jg) Patrick Polk - Thursday, February 25, 2010..." WebSite: NorthWest Navigator http://www.northwestnavigator.com/ [26FEB2010]
Photograph Caption: VQ-1 Sailors, from left, front row, Aviation Warfare Systems Operator (Electronics) 2nd Class Hanna Glenn, Yeoman 1st Class Sophia Graham, Olympic View Elementary School principal Martha Adams, and Intelligence Specialist 2nd Class Amanda Brady gather at a recent assembly.
As the new volunteer coordinator for Patrol Squadron (VQ) 1, Yeoman 1st Class Sophia Graham has taken the lead to help build a strong community. Graham recently stepped in for Senior Chief Aviation Electrician’s Mate Craig Olson who is currently deployed to Iraq.
At VQ-1, many Sailors deploy every two to four months, so they appreciate the volunteers’ efforts at mentoring the young ones left back at home.
“Parents may not have time based on their deployment schedule, so why not pick up the slack and go give that time back at the schools,” said Graham.
Graham recalls her own upbringing, and how volunteers were such a part of her growth and development.
“I’ve been volunteering for a long time and give back because I know [volunteer programs] were beneficial to me.”
Her spirit of volunteerism is another example of how teamwork keeps the Navy running.
“The school that we have is made up of primarily military’s children, so the majority of our Sailors’ children are in that school.”
Graham notes that it is not always easy for Sailors to fit volunteering into their schedule, particularly on weekends.
“I don’t fault the Sailors for that. Time is limited,” she said.
For Sailors that can find time to volunteer, the rewards are great.
“I think that’s the best service that you can give. It’s a lot of fun and the students keep me on my toes. They keep me hip,” Graham said. “Depending on what you are volunteering for it can open up some doors—get you a different outlook on things.”
Time spent volunteering might take away from family time, but the example parents set might well make up for that.
“To me volunteering is a priority, and I try to make sure that my children see that giving beyond themselves is a huge thing, so when they get older it’s just not that ‘me, me, I, I’ concept,” said Graham.
Currently, Sailors from VQ-1 are giving back to their community by volunteering with the Oak Harbor School District. Sailors are offer their time and effort year round, and Sailors are currently gearing up to read to children for the Read Across America project, where on March 2 they will read to students at Olympic View Elementary school for 30 minutes each.
Through her volunteer work and coordination, Graham sets the example within her community, and will continue to open doors of opportunity for her fellow Sailors.
© 2010 Sound Publishing, Inc.
Circa 2009
A BIT OF HISTORY:  VP-46 History "...Wing 10 Change of Command Season Wraps Up by LT(jg) Daniel MacCabe Wing 10 - Thursday, June 4, 2009 (Squadrons Mentioned: CPRW-10, VP-1, VP-40, VP-46, VQ-1 and VQ-2)..." WebSite: NorthWest Navigator http://www.northwestnavigator.com/ [05JUN2009]
Photograph Caption: Following VP-46’s change of command ceremony May 22, four of the five new Patrol and Reconnaissance squadron commanding officers flank Capt. Ken Seliga, commander, Patrol and Reconnaissance Wing 10. From left the new skippers are Cmdr. Brett Coffey, VQ-2; Cmdr. Mark Hamilton, VP-46; Cmdr. Michael Giannetti, VQ-1; and Cmdr. Mark Rudesill, VP-1. Not pictured is Cmdr. Michael McClintock, VP-40. Photograph by LT(jg) Daniel MacCabe
The Grey Knights of Patrol Squadron 46 celebrated their 73rd change of command May 22. After serving one year as commanding officer and guiding the squadron through a combat deployment in the 5th Fleet area of operations, Cmdr. Carlos Sardiello was relieved by Cmdr. Mark Hamilton.
For Patrol and Reconnaissance Wing 10, VP-46s change of command ended a very compressed turnover season that began May 1 with Patrol Squadron 40 “Fighting Marlins” changing hands as Cmdr. Michael McClintock relieved Christopher Saindon. VP-40 has since departed for a six-month deployment with 5th and 6th Fleets supporting Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation Enduring Freedom and other European Command missions.
The following week, Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron 2 “Rangers” celebrated their leadership’s turnover as Cmdr. Brett Coffey assumed command from Cmdr. Robert Pauley, May 7 and the Patrol Squadron 1 “Screaming Eagles” followed suit the next day with Cmdr. Mark Rudesill relieving Cmdr. Christopher Corgnati.
The season continued May 14 as the Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron 1 “World Watchers” held their change as Cmdr. Michael Giannetti took over for Cmdr. James Gibson.
“It is with a great sense of pride that we celebrate the end of each commanding officer’s extraordinary level of commitment, sense of duty and superb leadership each brought to bear within the command during their tours,” said Capt. Ken Seliga, Commander, Patrol and Reconnaissance Wing 10. “We look forward to the energy and leadership each new commanding officer will bring in the year ahead.”
© 2009 Sound Publishing, Inc.
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...Wing 10 Honors best, Brightest By MC2 Elizabeth Acosta - NPASE Det. NW - Thursday, April 30, 2009 (Squadrons Mentioned: CPRW-10, VP-1, VP-40, VP-46, VP-69, VQ-1 and VQ-2)..." WebSite: NorthWest Navigator http://www.northwestnavigator.com/ [01MAY2009]
Commander, Patrol and Reconnaissance Wing (CPRW) 10 held its annual ceremony to recognize the contributions of their Sailors, April 23.
This is the 14th year CPRW-10 and the Oak Harbor community honored the significant accomplishments of Wing 10 Sailors.
“Each of you earned your command’s nomination because of your selfless sacrifice and commitment. Your work has made us a better wing and I hope each of you finds pride in your many contributions,” Capt. Ken Seliga, commodore of CPRW-10.
The CPRW Sea Sailor of the Year (SOY) was Personnel Specialist 1st Class (AW) Gladys Willis, of VP-1, who was also recognized as the Commander, Patrol and Reconnaissance Group (CPRG) Pacific Sea SOY in January, and Junior Sailor of the year was Naval Aircrewman Operator 2nd Class (AW/NAC) Mark Hill of VP-1. The Shore Sailor of the Year was Aviation Electronics Technician 1st Class (AW) Danyall Benavides, of CPRW-10, whose contributions also led to recognition by CPRG as their Pacific Shore SOY, and Junior Sailor of the Year was Information Systems Technician 3rd Class Blake Hausman, of CPRW-10. The Reserve Sailor of the year was Naval Aircrewman Operator 1st Class (AW/NAC) Stephen Daley, of VP-69.
“It’s pretty big; It feels really good to get this award. It was a very honorable experience” said Benavides.
Gifts were presented by Jim Slowik, Mayor of Oak Harbor, Patrick Travenetti, director, Embry Riddle Aeronautical University, Marjean Knokey, Columbia College, Barbara Bockman, Chapman University, Mike Sevy, USAA Insurance Company, Kim Braylens and Robin King, of Navy Federal Credit Union, to further recognize the contributions these Sailors make.
The Battle Efficiency award was presented to VQ-2, the Commander Naval Air Pacific Isbell Trophy, VP-1, and the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) Aviation Safety award, VQ-1. Also honored at the ceremony was the Aviator of the Year, Lt. Ronald Rumfelt, of VP-40, and Flight crew of the Year, Combat Aircrew 2, of VP-46.
“As we congratulate the winners of each category this morning, I ask that you take a moment to appreciate the momentous commitment and sacrifices our Sailors made during the past year to ensure we were prepared for, and executed, each mission we were asked to complete. And may you especially recall the commitment to excellence of our award winners today- those who went above and beyond to earn the endorsement of their respective command,” said Seliga.
© 2009 Sound Publishing, Inc.
Circa 2008
A BIT OF HISTORY:  Photo by MC2 Tucker Yates "...World Watchers mark 16 years of reconnaissance - By Lt.j.g. Ely Infante - World Watchers reporter - Thursday, July 31, 2008..." WebSite: Northwest Navigator http://www.northwestnavigator.com/ [01AUG2008]
Photograph Caption: Lt. Joshua Krieg conducts a preflight inspection of the forward landing gear with the assistance of Lt.j.g. Greggory Thorpe, seen at left.
They fly alone and unafraid. For 16 years, Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron (VQ) 1 have been a consistent presence in 5th Fleet’s area of responsibility. There have been aircraft modifications and even changes to homeports, but it maintains the pace of forward-deployed operations that support the intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance needs of U.S. Central Command.
The World Watchers continue to distinguish the EP-3 as the reconnaissance asset of choice for U.S. and multi-national forces. The aircraft’s ability to remain on station for extended periods has proven to be an invaluable resource to troops on the ground. They are in high demand but relatively short supply.
World Watchers’ support in-theater cannot be understated. “Our job is to make sure nobody goes down,” said Senior Chief Aviation Electronics Technician Craig Olson (AW/NAC). With over 21 years of experience, he recalls exciting and hazardous times in and out of combat environments.
“We were usually one of the first squadrons in and one of the last ones out. There have been lots of moments of boredom, followed by moments of sheer adrenaline. We would take off and never know what to expect.”
The right attitude and mission readiness has established VQ-1 as the Navy’s premier Electronic Reconnaissance Squadron. Its track record of extraordinary operational success and mission effectiveness has been proven in Desert Strike, Southern Watch, Vigilant Warrior, Vigilant Sentinel, Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom. They trace their success to a long tradition of teamwork and service that began with two PBY-5A Catalina Black Cats modified for electronic reconnaissance during World War II.
Lt. Joshua Krieg, an electronic warfare aircraft commander with two previous deployments to the Middle East and currently embarked on his third, said, “As a member of the VQ-1 wardroom and a naval aviator, I feel a great sense of pride in contributing to the legacy of the squadron. We constantly fine tune ourselves to perform to the best of our abilities. We have a lot to live up to, and it is an honor to have an opportunity to lead a crew of 24 in today’s global war on terror.”
As an EP-3 mission commander, Lt. Patricia Shaw is responsible for the effective employment of the aircraft in support of combat operations.
Currently en route to her fourth deployment to the desert, she feels the pace of operations for VQ-1 in the “sandbox” is consistently demanding but can be professionally rewarding.
“Because we are in [Fifth Fleet AOR] year-round, we have a strong presence. But that doesn’t change the fact that the dynamics of the area are just as challenging today as they were 16 years ago. It definitely makes things very interesting for us out there, and it’s good to have a diverse aircrew that can provide different levels of experience and perspective,” she said.
Cmdr. James Gibson was there at the beginning as a young navigator aboard the EP-3. Today, as its commanding officer, he reflects on his experiences over 16 years, “When it started, conditions were very austere and exciting because we were in an AOR that we were not all that familiar with, doing constant surveillance with crews flying long missions. But the bottom line is that when we got there 16 years ago, we knew we were going to be a part of something big and that our role was going to be important not only to the Navy, but to the nation as well.”
As an experienced naval flight officer, Gibson saw the squadron change to accommodate the geopolitical landscape. He feels VQ-1 will always play a part in providing critical combat intelligence to commanders prosecuting this global war on terror. “Our missions may change, as far as what we’re doing there, but we are still going to have a mission, we are still going to have a responsibility and people are still going to want us there.”
Harry Harris, former commodore and commander of Task Force 57, added, “VQ-1 has flown in harm’s way more than any other Task Force 57 squadron since Operation Enduring Freedom began and has aggressively met critical reconnaissance needs in this time of war.”
© 2008 Sound Publishing, Inc.
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...Maritime Patrol and Reconnaissance Group - RADM Brian C. Prindle, USN. Wings of Gold - Spring 2008 - Page 6-8. (Squadrons/Wings Referenced: VP-62, VP-69, VQ-1, VQ-2, VPU-1, VPU-2, VP-1, VP-4, VP-5, VP-8, VP-9, VP-10, VP-16, VP-26, VP-30, VP-40, VP-45, VP-46, VP-47, CPRW-2, CPRW-5, CPRW-10 and CPRW-11..." WebSite: Association of Naval Aviation http://www.anahq.org/index.htm [23APR2008]

Maritime Patrol and Reconnaissance Group Article 166KB
Circa 2007
A BIT OF HISTORY:  CDR Catherine Phillips "...World Watchers welcome Phillips - By Lt.j.g. Sean Lawson - World Watchers Reporter - Friday, April 27, 2007..." WebSite: Northwest Navigator http://www.northwestnavigator.com/ index.php/ navigator/whidbey/ world_watchers_welcome_phillips/ [27APR2007]
VQ-1 World Watchers said farewell to commanding officer, Cmdr. Michael Carsley, April 13, when he passed the baton to Cmdr. Catherine Phillips, previous executive officer.
The Navy’s largest operational squadron is composed of approximately 100 officers and 380 enlisted personnel deployed to two detachment sites around the world.
Carsley assumed command of VQ-1 May 12, 2006, and has since guided the command to unprecedented levels of operational reconnaissance supremacy. While under his command, VQ-1 was awarded the Battle ‘E’ and the Silver EAWS Pennant. He was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal for his efforts guiding VQ-1.
Carsley’s next assignment is at the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations in Washington DC.
Phillips has logged over 2,880 flight hours in 23 types of aircraft.
© 2007 Sound Publishing, Inc.
A BIT OF HISTORY:  Photo by MC2 Elizabeth Acosta "...Wing 10 recognizes its best - By Lt.j.g. Evan Larsen - Wing 10 reporter - Friday, March 30, 2007 - Squadrons Mentioned: , VP-1, VP-46, VP-69, VQ-1 and VQ-2..." WebSite: Northwest Navigator http://www.northwestnavigator.com/ index.php/navigator/whidbey/ wing_10_recognizes_its_best/ [31MAR2007]
Photograph Caption: Award-winning CPRW-10 squadrons and individual personnel take the spotlight for their impressive work over the past year.
CPRW-10 honored its top squadrons, flight crews and personnel March 23. Capt. David Taylor, Commander, CPRW-10, hosted the ceremony alongside distinguished visitors to present the awards to the awardees.
VP-46 and VQ-1 won the Pacific Fleet Battle Efficiency (E) award for 2006. The Battle ‘E’ focuses on a naval unitís overall readiness to complete assigned warfare missions.
The Grey Knights of VP-46 returned from a Western Pacific Deployment last December, during which they demonstrated superior readiness and combat operations in support of Operation Enduring Freedom-Philippines and Exercise Valiant Shield.
Throughout 2006, VP-46 maintained sustained their commitment to professionalism and aviation safety reflected with more than 292,000 mishap-free flight hours spanning 43 years of service.
The World Watchers of VQ-1 maintained a continuous 365-day presence in the Fifth and Seventh Fleet Areas of Responsibility, contributing vital intelligence the respective Regional Combatant Commanders.
In 2006, VQ-1 flew over 4,000 mission hours spread among over 500 sorties, demonstrating unit efficiency and flexibility with limited assigned aircraft.
Other mentionable unit awards included VP-1 receiving the Arleigh Burke trophy, as well as VQ-2s nomination for the Chief of Naval Operations Safety Award.
The Flight Crew of the year honor went to VP-1s Crew 10, while the Electronic Warfare Crew of the Year honors went to VQ-2s Crew 26. Also recognized was VP-46s Crew 4 as the Order of Daedalianís Crew of the Year.
For individual awards, Lt. Jamie Delcore of VQ-1 was recognized as aviator of the year. Additionally, his nomination as Commander, Patrol and Reconnaissance Groupís Naval Flight Officer of the Year was recognized during the ceremony.
Likewise from VQ-1, Aviation Electronics Technician 1st Class Joseph Medina was recognized as CPRW-10 and Patrol and Reconnaissance Groupís Aircrewman of the Year.
Among the maintenance awards, VP-69s Aviation Structural Mechanic 1st Class Gerald Campbell was recognized as CPRW-10s Maintenance Professional of the Year for his leadership while on a Search and Rescue detachment to Guam.
Taylor emphasized the importance this yearís ceremony placed in recognition of CPRW-10s many 2006 accomplishments, but he stressed the need to remember those Sailors unable to attend who are forward deployed in harmís way.
© 2007 Sound Publishing, Inc.
A BIT OF HISTORY:  AW1 (AW/NAC) Matthew Robinson "...Wing 10 selects year’s top Sailors - By Lt.j.g. Evan Larsen - CPRW-10 reporter - Friday, January 26, 2007. (CPRW-10, VP-1, VP-40, VP-46, VP-69, VQ-1 and VQ-2 menioned)..." WebSite: Northwest Navigator http://www.northwestnavigator.com/ index.php/navigator/whidbey/ wing_10_selects_years_top_sailors/ [01FEB2007]
Photograph Caption: AW1 (AW/NAC) Matthew Robinson is seen on patrol in Iraq during Individual Augmentation duty.
Aviation Warfare Systems Operator 1st Class (AW/NAC) Matthew Robinson was recognized, Jan. 19, by Commodore David Taylor as the 2006 CPRW-10, Shore Sailor of the Year.
His selection came as a result of his tremendous professionalism and steadfast sacrifice exerted during a 300-day Individual Augmentation while supporting the U.S. Army’s 13th Sustainment Command in Iraq. As a member of the Joint Crew Composite Squadron One, and aligned with ground combat troops, he utilized his electronic warfare expertise to develop training and maintenance programs for ground forces which mitigated the radio-controlled improvised electronic device threat.
While conducting a routine ground combat patrol, he demonstrated uncommon valor during an attack on his patrol by stabilizing the wounded and preparing a landing zone for a medical evacuation helicopter.
Additionally, he showed the initiative to continue the patrol and search for secondary IEDs, resulting in a Meritorious Service Medal awarded from the Brigade’s Commanding General.
Aviation Ordnanceman 1st Class (AW/NAC) Robert Parish of Patrol Squadron 69 (VP-69) received top honors as CPRW-10 Senior Sea Sailor of the Year for 2006.
A consummate expert and extraordinary leader, his enthusiasm, professionalism and dedication to his shipmates’ career advancement and education resulted in his selection as the Sea Sailor of the Year.
One of only five full system Quality Assurance Representatives, he proved invaluable during a number of engine changes and the quality inspection of countless work center repairs which directly contributed to the high level of operational success achieved by the six operational squadrons assigned to CPRW-10.
The award for CPRW-10 Shore Junior Sailor of the Year went to Aviation Warfare Specialist 2nd Class (NAC) Carey Langley of CPRW-10.
Her expertise proved crucial in supporting 36 forward-deployed aircrews, as a result of her keen analysis from over 260 missions. As a leader in her field, Langley’s attention-to-detail led to critical enhancements in our national security.
CPRW-10 Junior Sea Sailor of the Year honors went to Avionics Electrician Mate 2nd Class (AW) Justin Leetham, currently serving in VP-46. Leetham recently returned from deployment with VP-46 in which he proved to be an exceptional leader.
He demonstrated honesty, integrity and an absolute dedication to duty. While at VP-46, his actions increased aircraft availability that executed 220 combat sorties and over 2,000 mishap-free flight hours in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom.
Oak Harbor Mayor Pro-Tem Danny Paggao, along with several local business and educational organizations, took time to pay homage at all the Sailors of CPRW-10.
As in the past, they provided gifts to recognize the winners and participate in recognition of the finest examples the Navy has to offer.
Every command in CPRW-10 had their senior and junior Sailors of the Year present for the presentation ceremony. These included;
-- VP-1 Senior Sailor of the Year, PS1(AW) Jared Zdrojowy; Junior Sailor of the Year, AW2(AW) Michael Headings;
-- VP-40 Senior Sailor of the Year, AM1(AW) David Anderson; Junior Sailor of the Year, AM2(AW) Matthew Vitello;
-- VP-46 Senior Sailor of the Year, AW1(AW) Gamorro Cameron; Junior Sailor of the Year, AE2(AW) Justin Leetham;
-- VP-69 Senior Sailor of the Year, AO1 (AW/NAC) Robert Parish; Junior Sailor of the Year, AT2(AW/NAC) David A. Smith; Selected Reserve PR1 (AW) Mark Wilde;
-- VQ-1 Senior Sailor of the Year, AM1 (AW) Luigi Giugliano; Junior Sailor of the Year, YN2(AW) Nicholas Hulse;
-- VQ-2 Senior Sailor of the Year, AM1(AW) John Bouquio; Junior Sailor of the Year, AT2 (AW/NAC) Peter Benninger;
-- Mobile Operations Command and Control Center Golf Senior Sailor of the Year, ET1(SW) William Lewis, Junior Sailor of the Year, ET2 Colleen Colver; and
-- CPRW-10 Shore Sailor of the Year, AW1 (AW/NAC) Matthew Robinson; Junior Sailor of the Year AW2 (NAC) Carey Langley.
© 2007 Sound Publishing, Inc.
Circa 2006
A BIT OF HISTORY:  061018-N-3003C-108 Southwest Asia (Oct. 18, 2006) "...Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy (MCPON) Joe Campa Jr., answers questions from the Sailors assigned to Patrol Squadron Nine (VP-9) and Fleet Air Recon Squadron 1 (VQ-1), relating to the upcoming merger of rates in the Navy aviation community. MCPON Campa is touring the 5th Fleet Area of Responsibility (AOR) in order to gauge the mission effectiveness of CTG 57.2, survey the working and living spaces of the Sailors, and to discuss the future of Maritime Patrol and Airborne Reconnaissance within the 5th Fleet AOR. CTG 57.2 consists of four Patrol Squadrons (VP), VP-9, VP-8, VP-16, and VP-46. The primary mission of CTG 57.2 is to conduct reconnaissance and maritime patrol operations throughout the 5th Fleet AOR in support of the global war on terrorism. U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist Seaman Brett A. Custer (RELEASED)..." WebSite: Navy News Stand http://www.navy.mil/view_single.asp?id=40058 [22OCT2006]
A BIT OF HISTORY:  061018-N-3003C-116 Southwest Asia (Oct. 18, 2006) "...Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy (MCPON) Joe Campa, Jr., discusses Individual Augmentation (IA) matters with Sailors assigned to Patrol Squadron Nine (VP-9) and Fleet Air Recon Squadron 1 (VQ-1) during his visit to Southwest Asia. MCPON Campa is touring the 5th Fleet Area of Responsibility (AOR) in order to gauge the mission effectiveness of CTG 57.2, survey the working and living spaces of the Sailors, and to discuss the future of Maritime Patrol and Airborne Reconnaissance within the 5th Fleet AOR. CTG 57.2 consists of four Patrol Squadrons (VP), Nine, Eight, Sixteen, and Forty Six. The primary mission of CTG 57.2 is to conduct reconnaissance and maritime patrol operations throughout the 5th Fleet AOR in support of the global war on terrorism. U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist Seaman Brett A. Custer (RELEASED)..." WebSite: Navy News Stand http://www.navy.mil/view_single.asp?id=40059 [22OCT2006]
A BIT OF HISTORY:  Cmdr. Michael Carsley "...Carsley takes command of World Watchers - By Lt.j.g. Jordon Voss - World Watcher Reporter - Friday, May 19, 2006..." WebSite: Northwest Navigator http://www.northwestnavigator.com/index.php/navigator/whidbey/carsley_takes_command_of_world_watchers/ [19MAY2006]
The men and women of VQ-1 said farewell to Commanding Officer, Cmdr. Garner Morgan Jr. May 12 when he passed the baton to Cmdr. Michael Carsley, the squadron’s former executive officer.
The Navy’s largest operational squadron is composed of approximately 100 officers and 450 enlisted personnel, deployed to two detachment sites around the world.
Rear Adm. James Hart, director, Total Force Programming and Manpower Management Division Office of the Chief of Naval Operations was guest of honor and keynote speaker.
He praised Morgan for his exceptional leadership of VQ-1 through his continuous combat mission in support of Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom.
Morgan assumed command of VQ-1 on May 2005, and has since guided the command to unprecedented levels of operational reconnaissance supremacy. He was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal for his efforts guiding VQ-1.
Morgan’s next assignment will be in Cuba, where he will serve as the executive assistant.
Carsley graduated and was commissioned from the U.S. Naval Academy in May 1988 with a bachelor’s degree in economics. Upon commissioning, he began flight training in the summer of 1988 as a student naval aviator.
After completing the advanced maritime pilot pipeline in 1990, he received orders to fly the C-130 with VRC-50 from NAS Cubi Point, Philippines where he participated in Desert Storm. In VRC-50, he held various assignments and completed his tour as assistant maintenance officer with a NATOPS instructor qualification in the C-130.
In 1993, he was granted a transition to the EP-3 and proceeded to VQ-2 in NS Rota, Spain. While in VQ-2, he attained his warfare designation as an Electronics Warfare Mission Commander flying missions over the Balkans during the Bosnia conflict.
He also achieved an instructor pilot qualification in the P-3. He ended his tour in VQ-2 as the assistant operations officer. In March of 1997, he departed VQ-2 for NAF Naples, Italy.
From 1997 until 1999, he worked for Commander Task Force 67 as reconnaissance officer handling all pertinent issues for reconnaissance platforms to include VQ-2 and special projects units working within the Sixth Fleet area of operations.
Most notably, he assisted in operations planning during the Kosovo conflict and developed new reconnaissance reporting areas in the Mediterranean.
Returning to Spain in 1999, Carsley reported for his department head tour to VQ-2 where he participated in Operation Northern Watch and held positions of officer in charge detachment Souda Bay, assistant operations officer and maintenance officer.
In October of 2001, he returned to the United States and was assigned to VP-30 as operations officer.
While operations officer, he became a Fleet Replacement Instructor Pilot and qualified as formation lead and formation instructor.
In March of 2003, he was assigned to Norfolk, Va., with orders to U.S. Joint Forces Command. While there, he held the position of deputy for intelligence operations, working to transform intelligence at the operational level of war in such areas as counterintelligence and battle damage assessment.
Carsley has logged approximately 3,500 hours in various U.S. Navy aircraft. His awards include the Defense Meritorious Service Medal, Meritorious Service Medal, three Air Medals (one Specific Action and two Strike/Flight), three Navy Commendation Medals, the Navy/Marine Corps Achievement Medal.
© 2006 Sound Publishing, Inc.
A BIT OF HISTORY:  060309-N-3207B-006 Al Udeid, Qatar (March 9, 2006) "...Sailors assigned to Patrol Squadron Four Seven (VP-47), Patrol Squadron Two Six (VP-26) and Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron One (VQ-1) gathered to take the Navy-wide Advancement Exam at the Desert Eagle Lounge on board Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar. VP-47 is currently on deployment to Qatar in support of maritime patrol operations and the global war on terrorism. U.S. Navy photo by Photographer's Mate 2nd Class Jennifer L. Bailey (RELEASED)..." WebSite: Navy Newsstand http://www.navy.mil/view_single.asp?id=32665 [26MAR2006]
A BIT OF HISTORY:  Wing 10 Photo "...Heroes declared this President’s Day - Friday, February 24, 2006 - Squadrons Mention: CPRW-10, VP-1, VP-40, VP-46, VQ-1 and VQ-2..." WebSite: Northwest Navigator http://www.northwestnavigator.com/index.php/navigator/whidbey/heroes_declared_this_presidents_day/ [27FEB2006]
Photograph Caption: Lt. Cmdr. Steven Richards and Aviation Structural Mechanic (Safety Equipment) 2nd Class (Air Warfare/Naval Aircrewman) Kyle Musto, VP-46, just two of the Wing 10 aviation professionals recognized at the recent annual awards ceremony, stand ready by the P-3 Orion.
Patrol and Reconnaissance Wing Ten (CPRW-10) held its annual awards quarters Wednesday. The heroes we recognized on President’s Day, like our forefathers, exemplify what it means to be a patriot; giving of themselves to make this a better country, one shipmate at a time.
“There are few duties more rewarding than the opportunity to thank these tremendous performers who are flying and maintaining our combat aircraft,” said Capt. John Dziminowicz, commander, Patrol and Reconnaissance Wing 10. “I treasure these opportunities to acknowledge the excellent men and women who make our Force a capable, formidable tool for war fighting commanders across the globe.”
Command Support Professional
Awarded to Hospital Corpsman 3rd Class(AW) Maurice Brown, of Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron Two (VQ-2). Brown ensured squadron medical readiness in the midst of a complex homeport move from Rota, Spain to NAS Whidbey and with consistent attention to detail, enabled the smooth and on-time deployment of 22 detachments,
Maintenance Professional
Awarded to Aviation Ordnanceman 1st Class (AW) Donald Weatherby of Patrol Squadron One (VP-1). Weatherby achieved numerous qualifications including Safe for Flight (releasing aircraft for flight), a position not normally achieved by a first class petty officer. His leadership in Maintenance Control was instrumental in executing over 40 percent of VP-1’s flight hours, and resulted in zero discrepancies for the ordnance shop during the most recent Aviation Maintenance Inspection.
Aircrewman
Aviation Electronics Technician 1st Class (AW/NA) Joseph Medina of VQ-1 was recognized for his leadership as president of VQ-1s 1st Class Petty Officer Association, leading 77 first class petty officers in numerous volunteer efforts. He authored and taught 15 avionics presentations, trained 29 aircrew, significantly increasing the squadron’s operational readiness. As Aircrew Detachment leading petty officer he trained and led eight aircrewmen in the repair of 40 in-flight discrepancies, resulting in a 100 percent sortie completion rate.
Enlisted Instructor
Aviation Structural Mechanic (Safety Equipment) 2nd Class (AW/NA) Kyle Musto, VP-46s top Flight Engineer, played an integral part in training 18 flight engineers, instructor pilots, and observers. As an instructor and handpicked as primary Flight Engineer Evaluator, he administered check rides and proctored positional exams, while racking up over 390 aircraft hours and 200 simulator hours as an instructor.
Officer Instructor
Lt. Edward Kribs, also of VP-46, recognized as the officer instructor of the year, attained every qualification available to a first tour pilot, with 450 hours as an aircraft commander and over 200 as an instructor. Leading the VP-46 training department, often under challenging conditions, he directly contributed to the qualification of 15 plane commanders and pilots and sat on 28 qualification boards.
Aviator
Lt. Jeffery Walker of VQ-1 is a fully qualified Senior Evaluator and Mission Commander and has been an outstanding performer during unit evaluations, achieving his warfare qualification 10 months ahead of the Wing 10 goal. While accumulating over 900 flight hours, including 263 combat hours, he remains committed to mentoring other junior officers. His guidance as NFO training officer significantly reduced training time for NFO “upgraders.”
Electronic Warfare Crew
VQ-2s Combat Reconnaissance Crew 24 has flown 233 mishap-free combat hours in Operation Iraqi Freedom and for the Coalition Forces Maritime Component Commander in the Arabian Gulf. They spent 71 days in the Central Command Area of Responsibility, during which time they were the sole provider of threat intelligence that saved American lives during an OIF combat mission. As the first to arrive in response to troops under fire, they increased the situational awareness and security of ground forces under attack.
Flight Crew
VP-40s Combat Aircrew 6 flew over 170 combat flight hours in support of Operation Enduring Freedom-Philippines, providing real-time imagery and data collection for forces on the ground. Due to their professionalism and dedication to performance, they maintained 100 percent readiness throughout the home cycle and qualified three designated aircrew instructors.
Junior Officer Leader Excellence
Lt. Michael Haymon of VP-40 is a combat-tested veteran, who flew over 107 flight hours in support of OEF-P, and is directly responsible for his crew’s unprecedented success in providing crucial information to ground forces. As the senior naval flight officer instructor he ensured compliance and currency of all 26 NFO’s, leading them through the last Seventh Fleet deployment.
Peer Leadership
The Navy and Marine Association recognized the following individuals based on votes by their peers.
E-7 to E-9 category, Senior Chief Aviation Machinist Mate (AW/NA) Glenn Grimmer, VP-1
Junior Officer (O-1 to O-3) category, Lt. Dennis Jensen, VP-40
Department Head (O-4) category, Lt. Cmdr. Steven Richards, VP-46
Command (O-6) category, Cmdr. Raymond Keledei, VP-46
Dziminowicz closed the ceremony with thanks to all the men and women of Wing 10 who faced and mastered the numerous challenges in 2005, both here at home and around the world.
© 2006 Sound Publishing, Inc.
A BIT OF HISTORY:  Photo by Lt.j.g. Karie Johnson "...VQ-1 bat logo tells of long history - By Lt.j.g. Karie Johnson World Watchers' reporter - Friday, February 3, 2006..." WebSite: Northwest Navigator http://www.northwestnavigator.com/index.php/navigator/whidbey/vq_1_bat_logo_tells_of_long_history/ [09FEB2006]
Photo Description: Photo by Lt.j.g. Karie Johnson - Tail art of "Barney" the bat.
Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron One (VQ-1) carries on a long tradition of electronic warfare squadrons of using a bat in their insignia.
The U.S. Navy first used a bat on its official squadron insignia in the 1920s. The Observation Squadron, VOS-3S, flew the Vought O2U-1 Corsair, which was poorly suited for the mission and caused the crew to complain that they were “blind as bats”.
The bat insignia caught on and was used by the squadron as it changed designation until it was disestablished in 1937.
During World War II, various patrol and reconnaissance squadrons, including the predecessors to VQ-1, used bats on their insignia to symbolize the type of flying they did.
These flights were flown when the moon was not full and often in stormy weather to provide cover. This was back when most countries did not have radar and aircraft intercepts were done visually.
Coincidentally, the navigation equipment then used aural tones to provide direction, similar to the way a bat finds food. As you flew toward a navigation station, the tone would get stronger and as you flew away the tone would get weaker, with a cone of silence directly over the station. This allowed crews to locate foreign stations and it worked as well at night as it did during the day.
All of this added to the use of a bat as official squadron insignia. As the squadron was re-designated and new platforms were introduced, use of the bat was continued. The bat represented the electronic countermeasures origin without depicting what the aircrews did.
VQ-1 adopted the bat as its insignia after being established as Electronic Countermeasures Squadron One in 1955. A stencil of a bat was often taken on deployment and little bats would spring up wherever they landed.
After VQ-1 moved to NAS Agana, Guam in 1971, they kept a live fruit bat in the hangar as a mascot. His name was Barney and he was the responsibility of the squadron duty officer. He was kept in a cage located near the squadron’s snack bar, so everyone passing by kept him well fed. Unfortunately, after he passed away the squadron was unable to replace him, but the legacy of the bat lives on.
© 2006 Sound Publishing, Inc.
Circa 2005
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...//NO1650// - MSGID/GENADMIN/CNO N09F/10A/APR// - SUBJ/CNO ANNUAL AVIATION SAFETY AWARDS// - REF/A/DOC/OPNAVINST 1650.28// - NARR/REF A IS CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS AVIATION-RELATED SAFETY AWARDS// - POC/E. K. THOMPSON/CIV/NAVSAFECEN 10A/LOC:NORFOLK - /TEL:DSN 564-3520 X7226// - GENTEXT/REMARKS/1. PER REF A THE FOLLOWING COMMANDS HAVE BEEN SELECTED AS WINNERS OF THE CALENDAR YEAR 2005 CNO - AVIATION SAFETY AWARD (Few Squadrons Mentioned: VP-10, VP-92, VPU-2, VQ-1, VQ-2 and VX-1)..." WebSite: Safety Center http://safetycenter.navy.mil/awards/CNO_SafetyMsg05.txt [05JUN2006]
A. COMNAVAIRLANTB. COMNAVAIRPACC. COMMARFORCOMMARINE TRANSPORTATION SQUADRON 1 MARINE LIGHT/ATTACK HELICOPTER SQUADRON 167 MARINE MEDIUM HELICOPTER SQUADRON 264 MARINE TACTICAL ELECTRONIC WARFARE SQUADRON 1 MARINE FIGHTER ATTACK SQUADRON 251 MARINE MEDIUM HELICOPTER SQUADRON 266 MARINE LIGHT/ATTACK HELICOPTER SQUADRON 269 MARINE FIGHTER ATTACK SQUADRON 115 MARINE AERIAL REFUELER TRANSPORT SQUADRON 252 MARINE ALL WEATHER FIGHTER ATTACK SQUADRON 533 D. COMMARFORPACMARINE LIGHT ATTACK HELICOPTER SQUADRON 369 MARINE MEDIUM HELICOPTER SQUADRON 364 MARINE HEAVY HELICOPTER SQUADRON 465 MARINE MEDIUM HELICOPTER SQUADRON 262 MARINE ALL WEATHER FIGHTER ATTACK SQUADRON 242 MARINE AERIAL REFUELER TRANSPORT SQUADRON 152 MARINE HEAVY HELICOPTER SQUADRON 363 MARINE HEAVY HELICOPTER SQUADRON 466 MARINE FIGHTER ATTACK TRAINING SQUADRON 101 MARINE ATTACK SQUADRON 211 MARINE MEDIUM HELICOPTER TRAINING SQUADRON 164 MARINE MEDIUM HELICOPTER SQUADRON 161 MARINE CORPS AIR STATION YUMA E. COMNAVAIRFORESF. CG FOURTH MAWMARINE LIGHT ATTACK HELICOPTER SQUADRON 773 MARINE MEDIUM HELICOPTER SQUADRON 774 MARINE MEDIUM HELICOPTER SQUADRON 764 MARINE FIGHTER ATTACK SQUADRON 142 MARINE AERIAL REFUELER TRANSPORT SQUADRON 452 G. NATRACOMH. COMNAVAIRSYSCOMAIR TEST AND EVALUATION SQUADRON 20 2. REQUEST CONTROLLING CUSTODIANS DISSEMINATE INFO TO ALL WINNERS. CITATIONS AND PLAQUES WILL BE FORWARDED TO COGNIZANT CONTROLLING CUSTODIANS FOR PRESENTATION.
3. THESE AWARD WINNERS ARE RECOGNIZED FOR THEIR COMMITMENT TO PROFESSIONALISM, SOLID LEADERSHIP AND COMPETENT RISK MANAGEMENT THAT LEAD TO SAFE AND EFFECTIVE OPERATIONS. VERY WELL DONE TO ALL HANDS.//
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...World Watcher is lifesaver, hero By Lt.j.g. Jordon Voss World Watchers reporter - Friday, November 18, 2005..." WebSite: Northwest Navigator http://www.northwestnavigator.com/index.php/navigator/whidbey/world_watcher_is_lifesaver_hero/ [18NOV2005]
When Aviation Structural Mechanic 1st Class(AW) Jerry Lego sat down for dinner Oct. 28 he did not anticipate that an otherwise mundane day would see him become a true hero.
While eating dinner in the Qatar chow hall, Lego noticed a woman choking and immediately sprung into action. He followed the choking patient protocol perfectly. First, he asked if the woman was “alright,” to which she shook her head side-to-side. Lego then asked if the lady could speak, to which she shook her head “no” again. Lego took swift and decisive action, telling the woman he was going to help. He calmly performed a model Heimlich maneuver and successfully dislodged the obstruction- a piece of potato. After asking if the woman was okay, Lego simply went on with his business.
The story is particularly ironic because the woman Lego helped was Lt. Col. Lois MacDonald, Commander of the 379th Expeditionary Medical Group Medical Operations Flight. MacDonald was especially impressed by how proficient Lego was and how he acted like his life-saving act was, “just another day at the office.”
Lt Col. MacDonald, a life-saver by trade, saw fit to award Lego with a certificate of appreciation on Nov. 1. “I am so very grateful for the actions of Petty Officer Lego,” she said, “As a medic myself, I have the deepest respect for his actions and reaction to the situation. He is truly a hero.”
Saving lives is not the only way that Lego has been getting attention lately. He has been the leading petty officer of his detachment supervising 33 maintenance personnel during surge operations. He personally planned VQ-1’s detachment site relocation, including detailing each individual pallet’s exact size and weight with remarkable precision.
His plans also consisted of coordinating the shipment of tools and pack-up-kits, ensuring that both detachment sites could operate independently by sharing manpower talents, tools, and qualifications.
© 2005 Sound Publishing, Inc.
A BIT OF HISTORY:  Photo by Lt.j.g. Carlos Evans "...World Watchers recognized for their experience - By Lt.j.g. Marla Davis World Watchers’ reporter - Friday, October 21, 2005..." WebSite: Northwest Navigator http://www.northwestnavigator.com/index.php/navigator/whidbey/world_watchers_recognized_for_their_experience/ [21OCT2005]
Photo Description: AEC Jeff Houk and AEC Aaron Swoyer continue to build flight hours after completing a routine training flight.
Two VQ-1 World Watchers were recognized recently for their experience in the P-3C Orion airframe.
AEC Jeff Houk and AEC Aaron Swoyer were awarded 5,000-hour pins signifying their years of flying experience in the VP and VQ communities.
Houk began his 15-year career with the P-3 when he attended Flight Engineer school at VP-31 in 1990. His first assignment was to VP-47 in MCAS/NAS Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii. Since he began flying the P-3C, he has flown many different versions. During his tour at the Navy Research Lab, he was a flight engineer for the RP-3, NP-3 and UP-3 variants and now, in VQ-1, the EP-3 SSIP.
While the bulk of his flight hours came from flying the P-3C with VP-47 and VP-1, Houk prefers the shorter VQ det cycle and increased flight time.
“Flying with VQ is very different,” he said. “Our missions involve more high flying vice low-level ship and sub hunting. While I don’t miss going on the six-month VP deployments, I do miss the crew building that comes from long deployments.”
Swoyer also divided his time between straight-stick P-3Cs and the EP-3E. His flying career began in 1992 as a Flight Engineer Apprentice assigned to VP-16. He qualified as a Flight Engineer and remained in VP-16 until 1996. His next tour was in VP-45, where he achieved instructor FE qualification followed by tours at VP-5, VP-30 and VQ-1. Both men commented on how the aging P-3 fleet has affected the flying, the hours and the training of the junior aircrew.
“There are a lot less planes,” said Houk, “which inevitably effects training and experience. People are getting qualified with very little flight time, and at one time that was unheard of.”
Swoyer added, “There are aircraft commanders, mission commanders and qualified flight engineers that don’t have the experience flying that I had while I was still an Airman.”
Over the years, there have been numerous changes in the mission of the P-3 fleet and this has also had an affect on the aircraft.
“My first detachment was at the tail end of the Cold War,” Swoyer noted. “We deployed to Iceland and frequently were called upon to fly missions on Soviet submarines and surface vessels. Maintenance crews and aircrews were constantly on the go and were able to keep the aircraft in the air routinely, alleviating a lot of the maintenance issues that come up when aircraft sit parked.”
While the mission has evolved and the aging fleet introduced new challenges, Houk and Swoyer have adapted to the changes. The World Watchers are lucky to have the experience of these two seasoned flight engineers to execute the mission and train new flight engineers in the EP-3E and P-3C aircraft.
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...Navy Marine Corps News - Aug 13, 2005 - Quality Of Life - VQ-2 and VQ-2...VIDEO..." WebSite: Navy News http://www.news.navy.mil/management/videodb/player/video.aspx?ID=5352 [14AUG2005]
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...Navy Marine Corps News - Aug 13, 2005 - EP-3 - VQ-1 and VQ-1...VIDEO..." WebSite: Navy News http://www.news.navy.mil/management/videodb/player/video.aspx?ID=5351 [14AUG2005]
A BIT OF HISTORY:  Cmdr. Garner D. Morgan Jr. "...Morgan takes over World Watchers - By Lt.j.g. Charles Shehadi - World Watchers’ reporter - Friday, May 20, 2005..." WebSite: Northwest Naviagor http://www.northwestnavigator.com/index.php/navigator/whidbey/morgan_takes_over_world_watchers/ [20MAR2005]
The men and women of Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron One say farewell to Commanding Officer Joseph K. “Sully” Sullivan today when he passes the baton to Cmdr. Garner D. Morgan Jr.
VQ-1, the Navy’s largest operational squadron, is composed of approximately 90 officers and 430 enlisted personnel continuously deployed worldwide.
Rear Adm. Kenneth William Deutsch, Commander Patrol and Reconnaissance Forces Seventh Fleet, guest of honor and keynote speaker, praised Sullivan for his exceptional leadership of VQ-1 through continuous combat missions in support of Operations Enduring Freedom and Enduring Freedom.
Sullivan assumed command of VQ-1 on May 28, 2004, and has guided the squadron to unprecedented levels of maintenance and operational excellence. Since his arrival, VQ-1 has been awarded the Global War on Terrorism Service and Expeditionary Medals, the Battle “E” Ribbon, the Navy Unit Commendation, the CNO Aviation Safety award, AVCM Donald M. Neal Aircraft Maintenance Golden Wrench Award and has maintained a phenomenal 85.7 percent retention rate.
His next assignment will be at the Industrial College of the Armed
Forces located in Washington, D.C.
Morgan graduated from the University of North Florida in May 1987 with a bachelor degree in computer information science. He was commissioned through Aviation Officer Candidate School in January 1988.
Upon completion of NFO Flight Training and S-3B Fleet Replacement training, his first assignment was to the Scouts of Air Anti-Submarine Squadron 24 at NAS Cecil Field, Jacksonville, Florida.
He deployed onboard USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71) and participated in Operation Desert Storm and Operation Provide Comfort. He served as electronic warfare officer, nuclear weapons training officer and NFO NATOPS evaluator.
In November of 1993, he reported to VS-41 at NAS North Island, San Diego, California, as a Fleet Replacement Squadron Instructor in the S-3B aircraft.
There he served as Sea Control Wing Pacific Tactical Development and Evaluation officer, aviation electronics-ordnance division officer and quality assurance officer.
In June of 1996 he was assigned to Carrier Air Wing EIGHT at NAS Oceana, Virginia Beach, Va., as a member of the AWS. During this time he served as the Battle Group Surface Warfare Commander Watch Captain and completed a second deployment to the Mediterranean and Arabian Gulf onboard USS John F. Kennedy (CV 67).
Returning to San Diego in January 1998, he reported to Commander Naval Air Forces, U.S. Pacific Fleet as Flight Hour Program Manager and Flag Aide. There he earned Joint Professional Military Education through the U.S. Naval War College non-resident program.
In October of 1999, he was assigned to the Topcats of VS-31 and deployed on board USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69) for a third Mediterranean and Arabian Gulf Deployment. During this tour he participated in Operation Southern Watch and served as squadron Administration Officer, Training Officer and Maintenance Officer.
In January of 2002 he reported to Commander, Naval Air Forces, U.S. Atlantic Fleet in Norfolk S-3B readiness officer and flight hour program manager.
Selected for transition to the EP-3 as part of the sundown plan for the S-3B community, he reported in May 2004 to the World Watchers of VQ-1 as executive officer.
Morgan has logged over 650 carrier arrested landings and over 2,900 hours in various U.S. Navy aircraft. His awards include the Meritorious Service Medal, Air Medal (Strike/Flight), Navy Commendation Medal (six awards).
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...VQ-1 carries on mission - By Lt.j.g. Charles Shehadi - World Watchers’ reporter - Friday, March 4, 2005..." WebSite: Northwest Naviagor http://www.northwestnavigator.com/index.php/navigator/whidbey/vq_1_carries_on_mission/ [06MAR2005]
The impressive pace of VQ-1 operations continues in Operation Iraqi Freedom as EP-3E combat reconnaissance crews meet the intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance needs of the U.S. Central Command component commanders.
The Navy EP-3E ARIES (Airborne Reconnaissance Integrated Electronics System) aircraft and aircrews detached to the CENTCOM AOR as Task Group 57.1 continue to deliver critical intelligence to the war fighter. As a manned intelligence platform, the EP-3E has distinguished itself as the ìasset of choiceî for Army, Marine Corps and Multi-National Forces on the ground in Iraq.
The flexibility of EP-3E crews and their ability to remain on-station for extended periods is an invaluable resource for units on the ground.
As new targets or potential targets emerge, the EP-3E has the capability and staying power to be in the right place, at the right time to deliver critical information. On station, the EP-3E provides an impressive technological mix of intelligence collection capability in order to provide the ìbig pictureî to those on the ground.
Nearly as prevalent as the missions in support of OIF, the EP-3E is a mainstay of the Combined Forces Maritime Component Commanders collection strategy throughout the rest of the AOR. Building on a tradition of providing fleet support, the ARIES crews are in regular contact with the ships of Expeditionary Striking Force Five, including the carrier and the ìbig-deckî amphibious assault ship in the area. The EP-3E provides fleet warfare commanders with critical indications and warning, as well as important inputs to overall intelligence requirements.
In both mission areas, the EP-3E is also developing significant synergistic effects working with their sister P-3C squadrons in the Maritime Patrol and Reconnaissance Aviation community. The benefits of the MPRA community start with the exceptional relationships between the combined VP/VQ maintenance teams that keep the aircraft flying, their systems finely tuned and result in amazing mission completion rates of over 90 percent.
The close-working relationship continues in pre-flight preparation with the sharing of information and coordination between Intelligence and
Mission Commanders. Behind the scenes, the staff of Commander Task
Force 57 (Forward) provides daily support for the deployment, scheduling, tasking and maintenance requirements of the VQ-1 detachment. This hard work pays off in the air when EP-3E aircrews are able to coordinate their ISR efforts with the imagery capabilities of the P-3C to provide timely and accurate information to the war fighter.
The continued aerial accomplishments of EP-3E ARIES aircrews in Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom build on a long tradition of excellence that can be traced back to two PBY-5A Catalina Black Cats modified for electronic reconnaissance during World War II. It is a tradition marked by remarkable flexibility and adaptability in meeting the mission to operate, maintain and support the Navy’s finest Combat Reconnaissance Crews and aircraft, fully responsive to the needs of the war fighter.
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...VQ-1 Dixon is regular volunteer at VITA office - By Lt.j.g. Warren J. Shadko - World Watchers’ reporter - Friday, February 18, 2005..." WebSite: Northwest Naviagor http://www.northwestnavigator.com/index.php/navigator/whidbey/dixon_is_regular_volunteer_at_vita_office/ [06MAR2005]
As the tax season nears, one person you can count on is AMC(AW) Carol Dixon of VQ-1. She is a familiar face at the Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (VITA) office. Dixon began 10 years ago volunteering and managing VITA for Wing 10, and now is the site administrator for NAS Whidbey VITA.
You have probably heard of VITA through your command or previous news articles. This volunteer organization provides the invaluable service of assisting military members in tax preparation, advice and electronic filing—all for free.
As you come into VITA and meet Dixon, you are immediately captivated by her passion for her work. From Jan. 1 through April 15, she volunteers 60 hours a week, but treats each project with enthusiasm and a fresh outlook.
It is no wonder AMC Dixon is in such a trusted position. Repeat customers contact her year after year, and other volunteers rely on her expertise and direction.
Lt. Samantha Poteete, one of 65 volunteers, said, “We cannot have VITA running without her help. She got us this space and three extra computers we desperately needed.”
Dixon said, “My biggest motivation is the gratification of helping the junior Sailors. I feel great when I have someone get more money in their return than they previously thought, or get a return when they thought they would pay.”
But it does not stop there. “We further help the Sailors adjust their W-4s to tailor individual circumstances,” she added.
Her military volunteer work doesn’t end on April 15. Dixon established and maintains VQ-1’s Operation Uplift, a volunteer organization that provides food and entertainment for crews constantly departing and arriving from detachments.
Dixon is also president of VQ-1’s MWR.
Active in the community as a volunteer for Partnership with Education, Dixon helps the local school system, making herself available for sporting events and extracurricular activities.
Her unselfish dedication to helping others reflects her true character and makes her a role model for others to follow.
A BIT OF HISTORY:  VQ-1 History "...VQ-1 Intense operation tempo keeps World Watchers on the go - By Jeff Green - World Watchers’ reporter - Friday, January 28, 2005..." WebSite: Northwest Naviagor http://www.northwestnavigator.com/index.php/navigator/whidbey/intense_operation_tempo_keeps_world_watchers_on_the_go/ [06MAR2005]
NAS Whidbey Island, Washington is home to one of the most important providers of indications and warnings for the United States military.
This capability is proudly maintained by the “World Watchers” of Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron 1 (VQ-1). However, as a result of their year-round deployment cycle and demanding operational tempo, one rarely sees a “welcome home” sign displayed throughout the base or Oak Harbor community, but the sign does exist and is permanently displayed in front of their hangar.
This ever-present banner is a testament to the fact there are always at least two VQ-1 combat reconnaissance crews on deployment. They fly real-world operations around the globe 365 days a year.
There is a quiet and unseen flow of “World Watcher” crews leaving from and returning to base. The squadron’s contribution to the global war on terror is constant and unrelenting.
To understand the squadron’s commitment to this ongoing fight, you simply need to take a snapshot of one of its typical Combat Reconnaissance Crews (CRC). Most recently, CRC-1 returned home on Jan. 3 from a nine-week detachment to the United States Central Command theatre of operations. Led by Mission Commander Lt. Conor Garry and Aircraft Commander Lt. Michael Baxter, CRC-1 flew an impressive 242.4 hours in support of theater commanders. This included 180.3 hours of combat flight in support of coalition forces in Iraq.
Due to outstanding maintenance support, CRC-1 attained a 100 percent mission completion rate for all 25 scheduled flights in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom. Additionally, they flew 12 missions in direct support of the Combined Maritime Forces Component Commander (CMFCC), providing indications and warnings to United States and coalition maritime forces in the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, Gulf of Aden, the Red Sea and the Horn of Africa.
Upgraded avionics, communication and mission equipment greatly increased the EP-3’s capabilities during several high profile operations over Iraq, including Phantom Fury. CRC-1 provided direct threat indications and warnings to ground and airborne forces engaged in conflict against insurgent forces.
Additionally, CRC-1 provided valuable fleet support and information on virtually every mission to the USS John F. Kennedy and USS Harry S.
Truman Carrier Strike Groups, as well as the USS Essex Expeditionary Strike Group.
This intense operations tempo could not have been sustained without a dedicated team of maintenance professionals. Lt. Garry summed up the all hands effort by saying, “The maintenance detachment led by ADCS Kenneth Stegall and AMC Rudy Monge did an amazing job getting our aircraft ready for critical tasking. The operational tempo was insane, but due to their personnel’s around-the-clock efforts, my crew did not miss a single flight in support of coalition forces. The pace those Sailors kept up was simply astonishing.”
Specifically, AD1 Francisco Alarcon was awarded the Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal for his efforts, which included replacing five propellers, three propeller controls, one fuel pump and two auxiliary power units.
The Maintenance Department’s 24-hour-a-day routine was aided by the concerted efforts of several aircrew, such as AT2 Christina Illingworth, AMC Carlos Nunez, ATC Donald Cox and AE1 Gerry Earll.
Their dedication to mission readiness allowed them to work seamlessly with maintenance personnel to ensure the aircraft’s systems were fully capable to support the troops on the ground.
A dedicated ground support team, lead by Ensign Jill Surette, provided outstanding briefs and debriefs to the crew before and after every flight. Their efforts directly contributed to the crew’s situational awareness and helped to ensure safe flight operations.
IT3 Aljandro Rada was awarded the Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal for his efforts in this task.
The busy deployment of CRC-1 and their support detachment personnel is the norm, rather than the exception for the Sailors and Officers of VQ-1. Only the most dedicated personnel can continue to perform at this high operational tempo throughout the year. Unlike other squadrons, VQ-1 personnel deploy 365 days a year. There are currently four crews deployed throughout the world fighting the global war on terror. In the course of a three-year tour at VQ-1, Sailors can easily expect to be deployed for over half that time. This schedule can be extremely demanding, but the challenge continues to be met by the outstanding professionals of VQ-1.
Concerning the amount of hours put in by VQ-1 Sailors, CTT2 Nakai, a new LABOP in Training, has this to say, “VQ-1 is a great place. Skipper Sullivan looks out for our welfare, and always expresses the rights words to keep us motivated. Ever since the day I became Observer Qualified, I have been working on other Personnel Qualification Standards to advance in my job. Although the command demands a lot of work hours from us (the VQ community), I feel more satisfied, knowing that I have put an honest effort for the command.”
The hardship of being gone during the holidays is reflected very well in AT2 Illingworth’s observations. “I have been in VQ-1 for almost four years and have never been home for a VQ-1 Christmas party,” he said. “I have only been home for Halloween a couple times and Fourth-of-July last year. Maintaining a personal life is really hard because it always seems like you’re trying to make up for lost time … especially when you’re leaving again in a month-and-a-half.”
VQ-1 Sailors fight on the front lines in the global war on terror.
Their vigilance and individual sacrifices save lives on the ground, while ensuring our national security. In today’s global environment, those front lines are in places on and off the mainstream headlines, but VQ-1 is there bringing support to the warfighter and nation with every mission flown.
Circa 2004
A BIT OF HISTORY:  VQ-1 History "...Armer meets SecNav, re-enlists - By Lt. Jeff Green - World Watchers' reporter - Thursday, October 21, 2004..." WebSite: Northwest Naviagor http://www.northwestnavigator.com/index.php/navigator/news/armer_meets_secnav_re_enlists/ [08DEC2005]
Photograph Description: A once-in-a-lifetime meeting between SecNav Gordon England and Senior Chief David Armer will long be remembered.
Secretary of the Navy, the Honorable Gordon England, gave a great tribute to ATCS David Armer of Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron One (VQ-1) on Oct. 12. After 20 years serving in the Navy, Armer pledged to re-enlist in the Navy with Odyssey Maritime Discovery Center in Seattle as a backdrop.
With a deep sense of pride, Armer took the oath of reenlistment from the SECNAV on the birthday of the Navy and at his 20-year mark.
The oath carries with it a commitment to serve and Armer is certainly no stranger to commitment. He has honorably served with VQ-1 for his entire career.
After Advanced First Term Avionics (AFTA) training for his AT rating in Millington, Armer received orders to VQ-1. He finished Air Crew School in Pensacola and Aviation Electronic Warfare Operator training at Corey Station before heading out to Guam. From 1986-1991, Armer flew EA-3Bs and EP-3Es and learned various positions of the aircraft. Armer also met his wife Angela, a VQ-1 airframer, in Guam. At this time he built the ARIES II on a nine-month detachment and delivered the first aircraft to hit the fleet. He then moved back to Florida for an instructor billet at Corey Station from 1991-1994.Armer returned to VQ-1 in Guam for two weeks only to turn back stateside for the homeport change to NAS Whidbey Island (’94-’97).
From December 1997 to January 2001, he taught at the Naval Aviation Maintenance Training Unit (NAMTRAU) in Whidbey Island as the EP-3E lead instructor. Since then, Armer has been reassigned to VQ-1 setting an outstanding example of success.
“Wherever we are, we do it and we do it great,” he said.
Armer debated retirement at 20 years, but his goals in the Navy and VQ-1 had not been met.
“VQ-1 was my first and only squadron command. I feel ownership to it,” he said. “Now as a Maintenance Control Supervisor, I have more well-rounded knowledge of the inner workings of the squadron."Armer has re-enlisted for three more years and will attend the Senior Enlisted Academy in Newport, Rhode Island for six weeks in January after which he will then return to work at VQ-1.
Armer, who is a great candidate for Master Chief in the spring, has the potential to achieve his ultimate goal.
“We’ll see where the Navy takes me,” he said. “If I come back to VQ-1 as Command Master Chief (CMDCM), it will be a complete stint in the Navy.”
Senior Chief Armer did have a difficult time deciding on who should re-enlist him.
Lt. Brian Atwood, a senior pilot with VQ-1, is a leader and coworker of Armer.
“It was really tough for me,” Armer said. “I have great respect for his leadership style and demeanor.” But Armer could not pass up a chance to meet England.
“Twenty years, the Navy Birthday, meeting the Secretary of the Navy, it couldn’t be better!”
© 2004 Sound Publishing, Inc.
A BIT OF HISTORY:  Photo by PH2 Michael Sandberg "...EP-3E Passes latest Operational Testing - By Maritime Surveillance Aircraft Program Public Affairs - Thursday, October 14, 2004..." WebSite: Northwest Naviagor http://www.northwestnavigator.com/index.php/navigator/news/ep_3e_passes_latest_operational_testing/ [08DEC2005]
Photograph Description: Plane captain AE3 Timothy Adams stands by in front of an EP-3E "Aries II" assigned to the "World Watchers" of Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron One (VQ-1) while conducting shutdown procedures. VQ-1 is based in NAS Whidbey Island, Washington.
The EP-3E Aries II Sensor System Improvement Program (SSIP) upgrade passed a review by the Commander, Operational Test and Evaluation Force in September.
A final report on the operational assessment of the fleet issue 4.0 upgrade was issued Sept. 7, and found the system operationally effective and operationally suitable, reporting that this system upgrade is a “significant improvement in capability over previous versions” and “is recommended for fleet introduction.”
“This was a significant accomplishment,” said Maritime Surveillance Aircraft Program Manager Capt. Steven R. Eastburg. “The program is now poised to deliver a tremendous warfighting upgrade to the fleet. In fact, we’ve already received input from the fleet that this upgrade is delivering outstanding results.”
Operational testing consisted of 16 missions flown in the Western Pacific area over a 32-day period. This resulted in the accumulation of 129 flight hours. During the combined Developmental/Operational Testing phase, ground and flight-testing hours were also factored into the overall assessment.
Critical operational issues (COIs) examined during the assessment ranged from basic surveillance functions through safety/airworthiness. All COIs were resolved with a grade of satisfactory, with one exception - the Joint Interoperability COI will remain partially resolved until Link-16 is fully implemented on the EP-3E, and completes Joint Interoperability Test Center certification.
Developmental testing on the SSIP occurred in fiscal year 2003, and the work was split between the software integration lab at the Raytheon Technical Service Company facility in Indianapolis, Ind., and here in NAS Patuxent River, Maryland, at the Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division. More than 1,200 hours of ground testing helped assess the functionality of the upgrades that focus on enhanced signals intelligence collection, and an improved communication suite.
The SSIP is the current version of operationally deployed EP-3Es. Two squadrons, Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron VQ-1, based at NAS Whidbey Island, Washington, and VQ-2, based at Naval Air Facility Rota, Spain, employ a total of 12 EP-3E aircraft.
Currently, five P-3C airframes are undergoing conversion to become EP-3Es. When completed, these additional aircraft will provide a sufficient inventory of primary allotment aircraft and backup allotment aircraft to sustain an inventory of 12 EP-3Es throughout the platform’s remaining life.
The Joint Airborne Signals Intelligence Architecture Modification Common Configured EP-3E is the next generation of the Navy’s premier airborne manned intelligence platform, due to reach the fleet in 2005. JCC upgrades will initially be installed on the five converted P-3C airframes. All other EP-3Es will receive modification in conjunction with phase depot maintenance or special structural inspections.
© 2004 Sound Publishing, Inc.
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...Approach, May - June 2004 - Don't Worry, That Never Will Happen - by LCdr. Sean Maybee - LCdr. Maybee flew with VQ-1 at the time of this incident..." Naval Safety Center WebSite: http://www.safetycenter.navy.mil/media/approach/issues/mayjun04/dontworry.htm [08JUN2005]
This story, like many aviation stories, could start, "It was just another normal day.," but many days that start normally don't end up that way.
We were scheduled for a zero-dark-30 (middle-of-the-night) preflight and launch on a 10-hour grinder of a mission. Our mid-December flight over Afghanistan was in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. I was the officer in charge of the EP-3E detachment and the mission commander on this flight. I also would be certifying a newly arrived crew on the special instructions and procedures related to our mission. The arriving crew was very seasoned and had plenty of theater experience.
We were airborne at 0330, started our transit toward on-station, and completed routine checks and system run-ups. After 45 minutes, and while cruising at our max-range altitude of FL190, I got up to use the head and to grab a cup of coffee. I barely had made it to the back of the plane when I heard the sound no pilot likes to hear come over the PA, "EWAC [electronic warfare aircraft commander] to the flight station!"
Having not achieved either of my goals, I hustled to the flight station to see the flight engineer (FE) pointing to a steadily dropping oil-quantity indicator for the No. 3 engine.
"Not a big deal," I thought, "we'll shut it down, go home, and I'll be in bed by 0600." I should have gone to the bathroom.
While strapping in, I called for the No. 3 emergency-shutdown handle, which the FE acknowledged, checked and pulled. The copilot, in the left seat, flew the plane while I strapped in, slid my seat forward, grabbed the checklist, and started to go over it.
EMERGENCY SHUTDOWN HANDLE.........PULL (FE)
HRD (FIRE ONLY)..........DISCHARGED (P, FE)
CROSSFEED AND BOOST PUMPS....CHECK (FE)
PROPELLER........FEATHERED (P, CP, FE)
OIL TANK SHUTOFF VALVE CIRCUIT
BREAKERS.........AS REQUIRED (P, FE)
The FE pulled the emergency-shutdown handle (the fire bottle was not required), the propeller feathered, and we reset the oil-tank shutoff-valve circuit breakers to prevent further oil leakage. Almost immediately, the No. 3 fire-warning light illuminated, and the loud, distinctive fire-warning horn sounded. We were surprised, since the engine already was shut down, and the propeller was feathered. We silenced the fire-warning horn and quickly revisited the checklist, hurrying to item No. 2:
HRD (FIRE ONLY)...DISCHARGED.
About this time, the events got interesting. To our even greater surprise and growing alarm, dispensing the fire bottle into the engine only extinguished the fire-warning light for about a second, which restarted the fire-warning horn. We continued the checklist.
ALTERNATE HRD (CONFIRMED FIRE ONLY)......AS REQUIRED (P, FE)
I called aft for somebody to look at the No. 3 engine.
Soon, the very calm and reassuring voice of our off-duty FE, who had more than 10,000 flight hours, said over the headset, "Yep, commander, we definitely have flames out here. Some are coming out the tailpipe, and a little is coming out the cowling."
"Well," I thought, "he doesn't seem too excited, so it must not be that bad."
We continued with the checklist. The FE selected the alternate fire bottle and discharged it into the engine, but nothing happened. The fire bottle had no effect on the fire. I recalled glancing at the FE and the copilot, and, for about half a heartbeat, we looked at each other with huge eyes and "What do we do now?" expressions.
Anticipating a bad button or circuitry, the FE immediately checked the circuit breakers. He then reached up and punched the fire-bottle-discharge button about 10 more times, while the words "You've got to be kidding!" escaped my mouth.
Until this point, the events were straightforward and our flight-station crew quickly went through the procedures and checklists and coordinated with the back-end crew. But, we now were faced with a serious emergency not covered by NATOPS. Although I never have flown a tactical jet, it's my understanding that, at the end of their engine-fire checklist, pilots have the option to eject.
So, there we were: 0415 in the morning, 19,000 feet, flying south over the southern Arabian Gulf, three engines, getting slow because we were 137,000 pounds (our max gross weight is 142,000 pounds), and no remaining fire bottles on the right side, but a pesky fire still burning on the No. 3 engine.
The off-duty FE then piped in with his very calm and reassuring voice, "Yes, sir. It looks like about 18 feet of flame out the tail and 9 feet of flame from the cowling, just aft of the turbine."
Those of us in the flight station could not see the fire. Clearly, the FE's words were not what we wanted to hear. To me, time stood still while I pondered a long-forgotten flight-school lesson about how a fire could burn through a wing in about 90 seconds. Then, the copilot, who calmly had been flying the plane and working with me and the FE on the checklists, pointed out we were slow.
Almost simultaneously, I remembered another lesson from T-34 trainers about how to put out a wing fire by accelerating and slipping the aircraft to starve oxygen from the fire. The copilot started to descend (to increase speed) and put in a slip, while the crew in the back secured their equipment.
Anyone who has flown in the middle of the night, in relatively remote areas, knows there is little air traffic, and the controllers tend to be tired, slow to respond, and about as happy to be up at that hour as you are. When overseas, this situation often can be compounded by language barriers. Fortunately, a British expatriate was controller working that night, and, though justifiably slow, tired and bored when we did our initial check in, he became the world's most-awake controller after I called him the second time.
"Control, this is BR-549. I am declaring an emergency. My No. 3 engine is on fire, and the fire will not go out-repeat-the fire will not go out. I have 24 souls on board and fuel for about 12 hours."
After a long pause, where he probably was making sure he heard what he thought he had heard, a very alert British accent replied, "Copy all bravo romeo. Say intentions."
We just had started our descent, and I was looking out the window at all the oil platforms, pipelines, and tankers in the southern Arabian Gulf, and I didn't yet know my intentions. I was wondering where to ditch when I heard good news.
"The flames seem to be dissipating. Definitely getting smaller," came the ever-calm voice in my headset.
I figured two things had happened. The slipping and speeding up were blowing out the flames, or all the oil that had leaked was burning away. Regardless, ditching was not my first choice anyway, so I decided to land immediately. I requested vectors to the closest field from the controller.
"You are cleared to Dubai, Abu Dabi, or the military field," the British voice said.
With visions of another EP-3E international incident (like China) flashing before my eyes, I wracked my brain, thinking, "Military field, military field-what is he talking about?" After a few seconds, I realized I knew what field it was, and it definitely was the best choice for us.
Our situation was better with the fire dissipating and a place to go, but we still needed to land our plane, which currently was 20,000 pounds over the maximum recommended landing weight. I started to worry about being so full of gas, so I called to dump fuel. The crew's permanent EWAC cautioned me about the flames still coming out the engine-even though the fuel dumps from the other side of the aircraft.
We compromised and waited to see if the fire died out as we descended. We eventually dumped about 5,000 pounds of gas while still over water. Our goal was to land as soon as possible because we had no idea of the actual state of the fire, other than the flames had receded into the tailpipe, which had a red-orange glow.
It took about two minutes from when we secured the engine to the time we initiated the descent and only about 15 minutes from the time of the emergency until we landed. During this time, everyone on the crew was busy securing equipment, reviewing procedures, and discussing possible scenarios once on deck. With all the classified material on board, we had discussed executing our emergency-destruction plan. Because of our choice of airfield and landing country, we decided not to destroy anything, but to take special care to account for all material.
At 3,000 feet and 15 miles from the field, we had reached a stable situation, so I swapped seats to the pilot side for the landing. The flight-station crew reviewed our normal and emergency checklists, while the crew in back reviewed their procedures. The United Arab Emirates approach and tower controllers were excellent, and the crash crew was rolling when we made an uneventful, 132,000-pound, three-engine landing.
The subsequent engineering investigation of the No. 3 engine revealed the oil leak was caused by an aft scavenge-pump-bearing failure, which punctured the pump casing. The fire erupted because of the increased temperature resulting from the decreased airflow through the engine after it was shut down.
How often do you hear people say, "Oh, that never will happen." But, unlikely things happen all the time. As aviators, we need to think, train and practice for events we think (or hope) never will happen: Don't get complacent. Crew coordination was a major factor in handling this emergency. Everyone involved knew their job, how their role fit, and everyone contributed.
This experience taught the men and women of Combat Reconnaissance Crew 6 that teamwork in the execution of NATOPS procedures, along with sound judgment, are critical to handling any emergency situation. Crew-resource management is the key to success.
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...VQ-1 Sailors enjoy mass quantities of turkey - By Lt.j.g. Charles Shehadi - World Watchers’ reporter - Friday, December 17, 2004..." WebSite: Northwest Naviagor http://www.northwestnavigator.com/index.php/navigator/whidbey/sailors_enjoy_mass_quantities_of_turkey/ [07MAR2005]
The VQ-1 Officers’ wardroom and Chief Petty Officers’ mess held its annual Thanksgiving Day feast on Wednesday, Nov. 24. The feast was full of camaraderie and good fun for all.
Chief Aviation Structural Mechanic (AW) Guyla Vega and Senior Chief Aviation Structural Mechanic (AW) Clara Gusenius organized the event and brought hundreds of World Watchers to the table. Ham, stuffing, cranberry sauce and turkey were among the tempting dishes. In all, over 32 turkeys and 28 hams were devoured by the thankful participants.
“I think the chance to eat together as the VQ-1 family is a great way for us to come together as a unit,” said Gusenius. “But the best part about it is seeing people donate their time and efforts to serve our junior Sailors.”
Entertainment was provided at the end of the feast as World Watchers purchased raffle tickets to throw a whipped cream pie in the face of selected members of the squadron. People with the most tickets purchased in their names were the unlucky individuals to get “pied.”
Toward then end of the feast, VQ-1 continued in the holiday spirit by serving Sailors from VP-1, VP-40, and the Commander, Patrol and Reconnaissance Wing 10 ISIS team.
A BIT OF HISTORY:  CTA2 Sydney Swindell Slides Into Third Base "...VQ-1 Sailors play in All Navy softball tourneys - Thursday, October 7, 2004..." WebSite: Northwest Naviagor http://www.northwestnavigator.com/index.php/navigator/whidbey/vq_1_sailors_play_in_all_navy_softball_tourneys/ [07MAR2005]
VQ-1 was proud to send two players and a coach to join the All Navy softball team.
CTA2 Sydney Swindell, joined the All Navy women’s squad, and CTTC John Johnson and CTTC Rod Pryor joined the men’s team, representing the Navy in several tournaments.
Swindell attended a training camp held at Point Magu Naval Base in Ventura County, Calif., Aug. 29 through Sept. 11. As part of the training camp, the woman’s All Navy softball team participated in two ASA sanctioned tournaments taking third place in one and winning the other. After training camp, she and her team traveled to Peterson Air Force Base in Colorado Springs where they participated in a tournament against the Air Force, Army and Marine teams. The All Navy team finished third in that tournament.
The woman’s All Navy softball team consisted of 15 females; two other females accompanied Swindell from NAS Whidbey Island, Washington, AT2 Janice Jewell from AIMD and Lt. Charlotte Welsch from NAVPACMETOCDET.
VQ-1 chief petty officers Johnson and Pryor next joined the men’s All Navy softball team. Pryor acted as coach and trainer for the team for his second year in a row while Johnson played for the first time in his 21-year career.
Both player and coach participated in the training camp at NAS Pensacola, Fla. Aug. 25 through Sept. 6. The team played in two tournaments during the training camp before playing in a tournament against the other services at Eglin AFB from Sept. 9-11.
The Navy’s men’s team also took third place in their tournament and was only inches away from taking second place. In the bottom of the seventh inning against the Army team, the Navy’s last batter launched deep fly ball headed for the fence only to watch the be snatched up by the Army outfielder, robbing Navy of the home run and a second place finish.
All Navy tryouts were held in the region in July.
“There are 110,000 softball players in the Navy alone and they have to pick only 15 of the best players to represent the Navy,” Pryor said. “This is one of the greatest opportunities we have to represent our services.”
Pryor added that he hopes more commands start affording more people the opportunity to tryout.
All three VQ-1 Sailors said it was an honor to participate and all plan to make the teams again next year.
A BIT OF HISTORY:  021024-N-4374S-031 Central Command Area of Responsibility (AOR) Oct. 24, 2002 "...A Sailor assigned to the "World Watchers” of Fleet Air Recon Squadron One (VQ-1) sprays-down the propeller on a P-3 Orion with a water hose during an aircraft wash on the flight line. VQ-1 is home ported at NAS Whidbey Island, Washington, and is currently on deployment to the Middle East in support of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF). U.S. Navy photo by Photographer’s Mate 2nd Class Michael Sandberg. (RELEASED)..." Navy News Stand http://newshome.news.navy.mil/view_single.asp?id=12346 [04MAR2005]
A BIT OF HISTORY:  021024-N-4374S-034 Central Command Area of Responsibility (AOR) Oct. 24, 2002 "...An EP-3E Orion assigned to the "World Watchers” of Fleet Air Recon Squadron One (VQ-1) returns from a routine mission in support of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF). U.S. Navy photo by Photographer’s Mate 2nd Class Michael Sandberg. (RELEASED)..." Navy News Stand http://newshome.news.navy.mil/view_single.asp?id=12347 [04MAR2005]
A BIT OF HISTORY:  040519-N-0130O-003 NAS Whidbey Island, Washington (May 19, 2004) "...A EP-3E Orion assigned to the "World Watchers" of Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron One (VQ-1) is slowly driven into a freshwater wash station as part of a routine aircraft corrosion prevention program. The squadron conducts tactical electronic reconnaissance throughout the Atlantic, Pacific and Indian Oceans, Caribbean Sea and Persian Gulf. The squadron is homeported at NAS Whidbey Island, Washington. U.S. Navy photo by Photographer's Mate 1st Class Robert O'Dell (RELEASED)..." Navy News Stand http://newshome.news.navy.mil/view_single.asp?id=14305 [03MAR2005]
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...VQ-1 traces its history from two PBY-5A Catalina "Black Cats" used for electronic reconnaissance during World War II. In the past 50 years, the World Watchers have used aircraft such as the P4M-IQ Mercator, A-3 Skywarrior, WPBYV-2Q Super Constellation and the EP-3..." WebSite: http://www.militarynewcomers.com/WHID/Resources/Tenantcommands.html [16OCT2004]
Circa 2003
A BIT OF HISTORY:  VQ-1 Patch "...The PMA-290 is outta NAS Patuxent River, Maryland, commemorating the T&E of PR32, that VQ-1 EP-3E that made forced landing on Hainan Is after collision with Chinese jet. As you can see, the flames it is rising out of also contains puzzle pieces..." Contributed by Tom Grannis grannis1@earthlink.net [05FEB2005]
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...EP-3E Crew Receives Medals At Armed Forces Day Ceremonies - Washington, D.C., May 18..." http://www.chinfo.navy.mil/navpalib/news/news_stories/ep3-china.html [22JUN2003]
Washington, D.C., May 18 — The 24 members of the EP-3E hit by a Chinese F-8 fighter off the coast of Hainan Island Mar. 31, were officially recognized as heroes today at ceremonies at the annual Armed Forces Day Open House at Andrews Air Force Base, Md. The ceremony followed a welcome for the crew at the White House by President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney.
The crew were awarded medals by Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld and by Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Henry H. Shelton, U.S. Army. Lt. Shane Osborn, pilot of the EP-3E, was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross and the Meritorious Service Medal; Aviation Machinist's Mate Senior Chief Nicholas Mellos, a flight engineer aboard the EP-3E and the senior enlisted crewman, received the Meritorious Service Medal and the Air Medal; and the remainder of the crew each received the Air Medal.
At a news conference April 14 at Hickam Air Force Base in Honolulu prior to departure for Whidbey Island, Lt. Osborn described the events of and following the mid-air collision in international waters over the South China Sea on March 31, when the Chinese F-8 fighter hit the Navy EP-3E.
Lt. Osborn stated that, "contrary to some releases," his aircraft was flying straight and level, on autopilot and heading away from Hainan Island in international airspace when it was subjected to harassment from the Chinese fighter. He said that the Chinese jet came within three to five feet of his own aircraft twice, and on the third time, the Chinese pilot apparently misjudged and the F-8's vertical stabilizer, where it meets the fuselage, contacted the EP-3E's number one propeller.
The initial result of the collision was the Chinese fighter began breaking apart and the propeller of the EP-3E started throwing off pieces. The EP-3E is a four-engine, turboprop aircraft.
Lt. Osborn continued that the F-8's nose struck the nose of the EP-3E as the jet fell apparently out of control to the sea. Responding to a question, he said his initial thought was "This guy just killed us." He said the EP-3E rolled uncontrollably over as it started a nose dive, losing 7,500 to 8,000 feet in altitude before he wrestled it under control. Lt. Osborn said the EP-3E was almost upside down and he could look up through the windshield and see the ocean. He stated the EP-3E's left turn as described by the People's Republic of China as causing the accident actually was caused by the Chinese F-8 running into the Navy plane, putting the EP-3E in the out-of-control dive.
Senior Chief Mellos described the moments following the collision as "mayhem." He described the crew yelling over the noise of the wind and vibration caused by the loss of pieces of the propellers and the nose cone. He said it was the training that allowed them to gain control over the situation. "Thank God for the training that we practice every day," he said.
Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld had provided most of the details on the collision to a Pentagon briefing April 13. "It is clear," the Secretary said, "the (Chinese) pilot intended to harass the (U.S.) crew." He further stated that this was not the first time that a U.S. reconnaissance flight was subjected to "that type of aggressive contact from interceptors." According to the Secretary, there have been 44 intercepts of U.S. reconnaissance flights by the Chinese air force in recent months, six were within 30 feet and two were 10 feet.
The crew members of the EP-3E were detained on China's Hainan Island following the mid-air collision that forced the EP-3E to land at the nearest airfield. The Chinese have claimed the the U.S. plane violated Chinese air space in doing so. The Secretary stated that it was custom for aircraft in distress to signal via an international call channel, and that is what the heavily damaged EP-3E had done prior to landing at Lingsui, the Chinese military airfield, on Hainan Island. He also said the Navy plane circled the field prior to landing to demonstrate its damage.
The Secretary also discussed previous incidents in which Chinese F-8s had flown within feet of U.S. EP-3E aircraft, and he played a videotape that showed an aircraft with the same side number as that which the missing Chinese pilot had been flying. The tape, from January 24, showed the Chinese aircraft within feet of the EP-3E, experiencing difficultly in holding position and remaining airworthy, and which caused enough turbulence to "thump" the U.S. plane.
The EP-3E remains at the Chinese military airfield on Hainan Island, and discussions over the return of the plane continue between the two governments.
Circa 2002
A BIT OF HISTORY:  021024-N-4374S-026 Central Command Area of Operation (Oct. 24, 2002) "...Photographer’s Mate 2nd Class Richard Virginia assigned to Fleet Combat Camera, Atlantic, stands ready to capture video imagery of an EP-3E “Aries II” assigned to the "World Watchers" of Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron One (VQ-1). Sailors assigned to Fleet Combat Camera, Atlantic, are on a six-month deployment documenting missions in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. U.S. Navy photo by Photographer’s Mate 2nd Class Michael Sandberg. (RELEASED)..." Navy News Stand http://newshome.news.navy.mil/view_single.asp?id=3083 [08MAR2005]
A BIT OF HISTORY:  021024-N-4374S-036 Central Command Area of Operation (Oct. 24, 2002) "...Plane Captain, Aviation Electronics Technician 3rd Class Timothy Adams, gives a “reverse” command to a pilot as he guides his EP-3E “Aries II” assigned to the "World Watchers" assigned to the "World Watchers" of Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron One (VQ-1). VQ-1 is based in Whidbey Island, Wash., and is on a regularly scheduled six-month deployment to the Middle East conducting missions in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. U.S. Navy photo by Photographer’s Mate 2nd Class Michael Sandberg. (RELEASED)..." Navy News Stand http://newshome.news.navy.mil/view_single.asp?id=3093 [08MAR2005]
A BIT OF HISTORY:  021024-N-4374S-038 Central Command Area of Operation (Oct. 24, 2002) "...Plane captain Aviation Electronics Technician 3rd Class Timothy Adams stands by in front of an EP-3E “Aries II” assigned to the "World Watchers" of Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron One (VQ-1) while conducting shutdown procedures. VQ-1 is based in Whidbey Island, Wash., and is on a regularly scheduled six-month deployment to the Middle East conducting missions in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. U.S. Navy photo by Photographer’s Mate 2nd Class Michael Sandberg. (RELEASED)..." Navy News Stand http://newshome.news.navy.mil/view_single.asp?id=3085 [08MAR2005]
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...Lockheed Puts Navy Spy Plane Back In Air..." Contributed by Marco P.J. Borst P-3 Orion Research Group, Marco P.J. Borst - Leiderdorp, The Netherlands, E-mail: p3orion@planet.nl [17NOV2002] Lockheed puts Navy spy plane back in air By DAVE HIRSCHMAN Atlanta Journal-Constitution Staff Writer (www.ajc.com)
Xinhua / AP
The damaged U.S. Navy Lockheed EP-3 surveillance plane was repaired in Marietta, and with a few more test flights it will go back into active duty.
It came home in pieces on a Russian cargo plane.
Now, after 16 months of work by Lockheed Martin employees in Marietta, the Navy surveillance plane severely damaged in a mid-air collision with a Chinese fighter jet last year is flying once more.
The four-engine Lockheed EP-3 on Friday made its first flight since the April 1, 2001, collision, which erupted into an international flashpoint when the plane landed in China and its crew was detained.
The rebuilt spy plane took off from Dobbins Air Reserve Base in Marietta at 11:08 a.m. Friday and flew for about two hours.
"Everything went smoothly on the first test flight," said Jim Saye, a spokesman at Lockheed Martin's plant next to the base.
The EP-3 was flying off the China coast when it was met by two Chinese fighters. One slammed into the EP-3's left wing, and the Chinese pilot was killed. The damaged American plane fell more than two miles before the pilots regained control and landed at a Chinese airfield.
China held the 24-member crew for 11 days and inspected every inch of the plane and its electronic eavesdropping equipment. U.S. officials had to dismantle the plane and hire a Russian cargo plane to carry the fuselage back to Marietta, where new wing, tail and nose components were installed.
Lockheed says the plane will make at least one more test flight before going to a Raytheon facility for updated electronics. Then it will return to regular duty.
"We're looking forward to getting it back in the fleet," said Bob Coble, a Navy spokesman.
Circa 2001
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...Year of the Bat: 20001..." Contributed by STEPHENS, Ben crkshot@gmail.com [02APR2008]
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...Pacific Air Forces - EP-3 Recovery - Mr. Ross Higa - HQ PACAF/CECI - U. S. Air Force..." Contributed by NEALON, Dennis J. dnealon@nycap.rr.com [28MAR2007]
A BIT OF HISTORY:  010414-N-6939M-005 Aboard Naval Air Station, Whidbey Island, Wash. (Apr. 14, 2001) "...Lt. Shane Osborn from Norfolk, Neb., addresses a large crowd of well wishers following his return to the United States. Lt Osborn and his crew aboard a U.S. Navy EP-3 aircraft were detained by Chinese authorities following a mid-air collision with a Chinese fighter aircraft off the coast of Hainan Island, Peoples Republic of China. U.S. Navy photo by Photographer's Mate 2nd Class Christopher Mobley (RELEASED)..." Navy News Stand http://newshome.news.navy.mil/view_single.asp?id=632 [10MAR2005]
A BIT OF HISTORY:  010518-F-0352L-012 Andrews Air Force Base, MD (May 18, 2001) "...General Henry H. Shelton, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff presents awards to 24 crew members of the captured U.S. Navy EP-3E Aries II electronic surveillance aircraft, who were detained by Chinese military authorities on Hainan Island, Peoples Republic of China, March 31, 2001, following a mid-air collision with a Chinese F-8 fighter over international waters. The presentations were made during opening ceremonies of the 2001 Department of Defense Open House at Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland. U.S. Air Force Photo by Senior Airman Joseph Lozada. (RELEASED)..." Navy News Stand http://newshome.news.navy.mil/view_single.asp?id=689 [10MAR2005]
Circa 1998
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...Coming Out of the Shadows - Naval Aviation News January–February 1998 - Page 10 through 13...Squadrons: VQ-1 and VQ-2..." [15SEP2009]
Back in the old days, O-club bars around the world were populated with fighter pilots who shared many a story about their exploits in carrier aviation. In those same bars, there was another group of aviators who would not and could not talk about their mission or where their travels had taken them. If a fighter pilot engaged them in 6G hand maneuvers, these aviators could only wonder if the fighter guy knew anything about what their EA-3B or EP-3 had been doing behind the scenes for the battle group. The reconnaissance community avoided attention because it might compromise its mission, possibly endangering the aircraft and the aircrew.
In many respects reconnaissance units still work behind the scenes, providing support to the warfighter while shunning attention that might compromise their operations.
However, shrinking military budgets coupled with increased emphasis on information warfare have caused most traditional military units to rely more heavily on intelligence gathering, surveillance and reconnaissance assets. The increased emphasis on information has forced out the old “cloak-anddagger” mentality and pulled these units onto center stage. Homebased at NAS Whidbey Island, Washington, the World Watchers of Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron 1 (VQ-1) are representative of this new breed.
In January 1995, VQ-1 completed a home port change from NAS Agana, Guam, to NAS Whidbey Island, Washington, as mandated by the Base Realignment and Closure Commission rulings. During the move, VQ-1 continued permanent manning of two forwarddeployed detachment sites while relocating to the States. VQ-1 planes and aircrews never missed a beat. The det sites, located at NAF Misawa, Japan and Manama, NSA Bahrain, Oman, orchestrate daily flight operations within the Seventh and Fifth fleet areas of responsibility. Crews deploy to det sites for approximately two months, often traveling to Okinawa, Diego Garcia, Malaysia, Australia, Indonesia, South Korea, Thailand, Spain and other places around the world.
In 1988, VQ-1 retired its last EA-3B Skywarrior—a carrierbased, seven-seat jet affectionately known as the “Whale”—and became a land-based squadron.
Both VQ-1 and sister squadron VQ-2, based at NS Rota, Spain, now exclusively fly the EP-3E Aries II. This conversion of the Lockheed P-3C Orion has been specially adapted for signal intelligence. Numerous antennae bristle from the aircraft’s body and wings. The most noticeable of these appendages houses the AN/APS-134 Big Look radar; its antenna is located beneath the nose of the aircraft in a large radome that resembles a giant gray “M&M.” The EP-3E’s Allison T56-14 engines are the same as those used in the P-3C. They also have the beefed up landing gear and airframe to accommodate the heavier aircraft weight. Maximum gross takeoff weight is 142,000 pounds, which includes 60,000 pounds of fuel—enough for over 12 hours of flight.
Operations for the Aries II vary widely, but the mission remains the same in peacetime or war: to provide indications and warnings as well as combat identification to warfighters. “Indications and warnings” refers to the level and type of electromagnetic activity a target, whether a nation or a ship, is emitting.
The EP-3 crews convey this information to national intelligence elements, which collect and correlate information from multiple military sources. At other times, the Aries II crews relay signal intelligence data directly to the attack and fighter pilots flying missions in the vicinity of surface-to-air missile sites. In both cases, the data provided is critical to operational success.
A typical mission aircrew consists of 7 officers and 17 enlisted personnel. The aircraft and crew is nominally divided into three sections.
The first includes the flight station, navigation and communications suite. Three of the seven officers on board are pilots, rotating through the pilot and copilot seats during the mission. The most senior qualified of these is the electronic warfare aircraft commander (EWAC), who is directly responsible for the safety of the aircraft and crew. A second pilot, who is in the process of upgrading to EWAC, and a third pilot, who is still learning the aircraft systems, complete the pilot complement.
Two flight engineers rotate through the third flight station position. They monitor the aircraft systems and are specially trained to handle emergencies and malfunctions in conjunction with the pilots. The navigators are usually the most junior Naval Flight Officers on the aircraft. They are responsible for long-range and overwater navigation and global communications throughout the flight. The navigator plays a vital role in the identification of potential ground hazards, while transmitting mission communications. The secure communications operators are specially trained crypotologic technicians (CTs) who handle classified, time-sensitive mission communications.
The second section of the aircraft houses equipment for the interception, identification and analysis of electronic emissions. A team of enlisted operators sits at a bank of monitors and electronic equipment on the port side of the aircraft, which makes up the “in-line.” The first two positions are held by avionics technicians or aviation electricians called electronic warfare operators (EWOPs), whose function it is to detect and locate electronic emissions by a target nation, aircraft or ship. News of a signal of interest is passed up the in-line to the Big Look operator. This person has the most experience in signal identification, having already spent numerous deployments as an EWOP. The Big Look radar can also provide more detailed information about a signal.
If the signal is new or of interest, the laboratory operator may be tasked to perform further analysis of the signal. This individual is another highly trained CT who specializes in signal identification and analysis. The second most senior Naval Flight Officer of the crew runs the in-line and acts as the tactical evaluator. He directs the EWOPs and laboratory operators in their search and analysis of the electromagnetic spectrum, and passes information to the senior evaluator (SEVAL).
“SEVALs fuse all the data coming into the aircraft to produce an intelligence product that is usable, useful and understandable in near real time. It can then be disseminated to various theater and national decision makers, as well as operational commanders,” explained SEVAL Lieutenant Commander Jim Bonomo.
SEVALs provide the voice of the EP-3E. Upon their shoulders rests the majority of the mission decisions and the responsibility to get collected information off the aircraft in a timely fashion to operational commanders. National intelligence assets rely on the EP-3 to update and maintain their country databases; fleet commanders rely on the EP-3 to keep them informed of enemy activity; and strike pilots rely on the EP-3 to alert them to any enemy that may be targeting them.
The third section of the aircraft is managed by the special evaluator. This cryptologic officer manages six uniquely trained CTs, known as special operators. They are responsible for less conventional intelligence collection, which provides an indispensable component to the mission aircraft’s safety. Information from the special operators also feeds, through the special evaluator, to the SEVAL for evaluation and distribution to supported assets.
Additionally, one to two in-flight technicians fly on missions. They are experienced avionics technicians who troubleshoot in-flight problems with avionics and mission equipment, providing a fix-on-the-fly capability that often allows the crew to continue the mission.
Aircrews need aircraft, and aircraft need maintainers. The unique operations of VQ-1 put special demands on its maintainers. They are required to go on detachment to both Southwest Asia and Japan, but once there they may be called on a moment’s notice to another even more remote location. A great advantage to the EP-3E is that those who operate the equipment—flight engineers, EWOPs, in-flight technicians—are also those who maintain it. This makes the platform responsive to changes in the world and flexible in deploying to varied operational sites. While a crew and aircraft can operate at a remote site for extended periods of time, engines must still be changed and broken flaps repaired. For these tasks, a full complement of maintenance personnel must be available. These maintainers spend an average of 22 weeks a year deployed overseas. “We spend as much time in the air as we do on the ground,” noted maintainer AMS1 Ricky Admire.
“Sometimes we feel like Ping-Pong balls because we are moving so much.”
The reconnaissance mission is dynamic. The men and women of VQ-1 understand the importance of their role in the total military concept and accept the hardships required to get the job done—and to be the best in the world doing it.
On a stage where programs must be constantly scrutinized and intelligence information is becoming more and more valuable, reconnaissance squadrons such as VQ-1 are beginning to play a more obvious role—stepping out of the shadows and into the spotlight.
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...Navy News Service 28/98 MSG Dated 15 July 1998...NNS2814. VQ-1 flies safe for 11 years by Robert Reyes, NAS Whidbey Island Crosswind newspaper WHIDBEY ISLAND, Wash. (NNS) -- Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron (VQ) ONE recently commemorated 11 years and 67,400 hours of mishap-free flying. The squadron follows operational and maintenance procedures with attention to detail. Operational Risk Management (ORM) is also credited as a tool used to build the squadron's success. "VQ-1 has pushed Operational Risk Management for years, and now we are seeing the payoff," Commanding Officer CDR Mike Paul said. "Because of our high operational tempo, safety has to be a concern in every decision we execute, not just those directly involved with flying. "Every member of VQ-1, whether maintenance, aircrew or operational support, is trained and expected to make every decision with safety in mind," Paul said. "Safety is fundamental in having pride and professionalism in what you do. Along with ORM, many other safety programs have been implemented in the squadron that contribute and assure the safety of our Sailors and of VQ-1's impressive safety record," Paul concluded..." [16JUL98]
Circa 1995
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...Deployments, Change-Of-Command, Awards, Records, Etc. - Naval Aviation News - July - August 1995.." WebSite: http://www.history.navy.mil/nan/backissues/1990s/1995/ja95.pdf [12NOV2004]

Circa 1992
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...Squadron Deployments, Operations Desert Shield/Storm, Disestablishment, etc. - Naval Aviation News - July-August 1992.." WebSite: http://www.history.navy.mil/nan/backissues/1990s/1992/ja92.pdf [11NOV2004]

A BIT OF HISTORY: "...Miss Piggy Retires At 30 - Naval Aviation News - July-August 1992.." WebSite: http://www.history.navy.mil/nan/backissues/1990s/1992/ja92.pdf [11NOV2004]
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...[Global Security] WebSite http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/agency/navy/vq-1.htm..." [04JAN2002]
VQ-1 provides electronic reconnaissance from the east coast of Africa to the west coast of the United States. The squadron maintains a permanent detachment in Misawa, Japan and has maintained a continuous presence in the Arabian Gulf since July 1992.
The lineage of VQ-1's "World Watchers" can be traced back to two PBY-5A Catalina "Black Cats" modified for electronic reconnaissance during World War II. The unit formally established as the Special Electronic Search Project at NAS Sangley Point, Republic of the Philippines, in October 1951. By 13 May 1953, when it was redesignated Detachment Able of Airborne Early Warning Squadron One (VW-1), the unit operated four P4M-1Q Mercator aircraft.
When Detachment Able was reorganized into Electronic Countermeasures Squadron One (VQ-1) at Iwakuni, Japan on 1 June 1955, it was the first squadron dedicated to electronic warfare. The A-3 Skywarrior, or "Whale" as it came to be known, served the squadron for the next three decades. In 1960, not only was VQ-1 moved to Atsugi, Japan and redesignated Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron ONE, but the last Mercator was retired and replaced by the first of many WV-2Q Super Constellations. The "Willie Victor" would remain the backbone of VQ-1's long range, land-based reconnaissance efforts through the Vietnam Era and into the 1970's.
The squadron's involvement in the Vietnam War started characteristically, at the very beginning when a Skywarrior crew was awarded the Navy Unit Commendation for their role in the Gulf of Tonkin incident of 2 - 5 August 1964. For the next nine years, VQ-1 would operate from Danang, Cubi Point, Bangkok, aircraft carriers on patrol in Yankee Station and other bases in Southeast Asia. VQ-1's aircrews supported countless air strikes and are credited with assisting in the destruction of numerous MiG aricraft and Komar patrol boats. The first EP-3 Aries I joined the squadron in 1969, beginning the replacement program for the Super Constellations, which was competed in 1974. In 1971, the VQ-1 moved its homeport to NAS Agana, Guam. At that time it absorbed Heavy Photographic Squadron SIXTY ONE (VAP-61) and its former parent unit, VW-1. For a time VQ-1 consisted of thirty aircraft: sixteen Skywarriors, twelve Super Constellations and two Orions.
After the departure of the last Skywarrior in the late 1980's, the squadron flew the EP-3 Aries I exclusively. In 1991 the squadron closed its permanent detachment in Atsugi, Japan after 30 years and moved it to Misawa, Japan. In the same year, VQ-1 received the first EP-3E Aries II, an upgraded version of the Aries I using modified P-3C airframes. The squadron played a key role in Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm. Despite the harsh, difficult maintenance environment and 30 year old aircraft, VQ-1 amassed nearly 1400 combat flight hours with a 100% mission completion rate. Tasking included strike support, combat search and rescue, communications and over-the-horizon-targeting support to coalition forces.
In 1994, as a result of the base closure of NAS Agana, VQ-1 was notified of the homeport change to NAS Whidbey Island. Coincidentally, in July 1994, VQ-1 retired the Navy's oldest operational P-3, EP-3E Aries I BUNO 148887. Its retirement also marked VQ-1's transition to all EP-3E AIRIES II mission aircraft.
Circa 1991
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...EWACs, EVALs, And EWOPs - Naval Aviation News - November-December 1991..." WebSite: http://www.history.navy.mil/nan/backissues/1990s/1991/nd91.pdf [25OCT2004]

A BIT OF HISTORY: "...History - Naval Aviation News - September-October 1991..." WebSite: http://www.history.navy.mil/nan/backissues/1990s/1991/so91.pdf [24OCT2004]

A BIT OF HISTORY: "...Reconnoitering The Desert - Naval Aviation News - September-October 1991..." WebSite: http://www.history.navy.mil/nan/backissues/1990s/1991/so91.pdf [24OCT2004]

A BIT OF HISTORY: "...Desert Shield/Storm - Naval Aviation News - September-October 1991..." WebSite: http://www.history.navy.mil/nan/backissues/1990s/1991/so91.pdf [24OCT2004]
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...Naval Air Aids Kuwait Liberation - Naval Aviation News - May-June 1991..." WebSite: http://www.history.navy.mil/nan/backissues/1990s/1991/mj91.pdf [24OCT2004]
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...AIRCRAFT SQUADRONS PARTICIPATING IN DESERT SHIELD/STORM: VP-4 10 NOV - 10 MAR...VP-8 05 DEC - 10 MAR...VP-23 02 OCT - 10 NOV...VP-40 06 FEB - 10 MAR...VP-46 26 JAN - 10 MAR...VP-19 28 AUG - 02 FEB...VP-91 09 FEB - 23 FEB...VPU-1 25 JAN - 10 MAR...VPU-2 12 SEP - 10 MAR...VQ-1 08 AUG - 10 MAR...VQ-2 06 DEC - 10 MAR..." http://www.history.navy.mil/wars/dstorm/appenb.htm [26DEC97]
A BIT OF HISTORY: VQ-1 Contributed by John Lucas john.lucas@netzero.net [17AUG2002]
Circa 1990
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...Modernization Under Way - Page 8 to 9 - Naval Aviation News - March-April 1990..." WebSite: http://www.history.navy.mil/nan/backissues/1990s/1990/ma90.pdf [22OCT2004]
A BIT OF HISTORY: "VQ-1 DET ECHO Desert Storm IRAQ PAC 90-91 Patch" [17OCT99]
Circa 1989
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...Awards - Change-Of-Command - Page 26, 29, and 31 - Naval Aviation News - July-August 1989..." WebSite: http://www.history.navy.mil/nan/backissues/1980s/1989/ja89.pdf [22OCT2004]

Circa 1984
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...LETTER OF COMMENDATION - 19SEP84..." Contributed by CARPENTER, CTOCS(AW) Ed ecarp@iserv.net [21MAY2001]
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FLEET AIR RECONNAISSANCE SQUADRON ONE FPO SAN FRANCISCO 96601
1650 Ser NIG/1008 19 September 1984
From: Commanding Officer, Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron ONE To: Via: Officer in Charge, Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron ONE Det Atsugi
Subj: LETTER OF COMMENDATION
1. On behalf of myself and especially the aircrews, I would like to express the appreciation of all the members of Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron ONE for the outstanding spirit of cooperation and services demonstrated by the personnel of the FAIRECONRON ONE Det Atsugi SSO/INTEL and SPINTCOMM Communication Center.
2. As you well know, the success of our mission is depended upon rapid and accurate dissemination of special intelligence and general service message traffic. In this regard, our dependence upon the VQ-l Det Atsugi Communication . Center is total in recepting and transmitting message traffic and internally to SSO/INTEL for the precise and accurate up-to-date personalized briefs to all aircrew prior to each mission. I have repeatedly been impressed by your total dedication to this mission. When asked to respond to short-fused requirements, the results have never been short of outstanding.
3. As is known to all in the communications business, successful and reliable communications depends on each individual's assigned communications duties. In the past year the Det Atsugi Communications Center has provided exceptional communication support to not only FAIRECONRON ONE Det Atsugi, Naval Security Group Det Atsugi, COMFAIRWESTPAC, Naval Air Facility Atsugi, and the Naval Investigative Service on a continuing basis but has also acted as communication guard for the Chief of Naval Operations, U.S. Commander-in-Chief Pacific, Armed Service Committee for Congress. Despite increased incoming message volume and ever increasing outgoing traffic, your communications service has always maintained the highest possible level of timeliness and accuracy. It is also gratifying when someone outside the command officially recognizes a job well done. During the past twelve months, Det Atsugi has acquired four certificates of communications excellence from Naval Technical Communications Center North Island, San Diego, California for an error ratio of less than one percent. This is a truely outstanding performance considering the demanding, high tempo environment in which your communications center works.
4. Though the SSO/INTEL Department has always been short of personnel your true espirit de corps in providing the most outstanding ser~ve to each aircrew is highly commendable.
5. The professional manner in which the men and women of FAIRECONRON ONE Oet Atsugi Communications and Intelligence Division perform their vital functions has earned the respect and appreciation of the squadron on Guam as well as numerous commands in the Pacific. "Well Done".
Copy to: Service Record
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...History - Change-Of-Command - Page 37, 38 and 40 - Naval Aviation News - July-August 1984..." WebSite: http://www.history.navy.mil/nan/backissues/1980s/1984/ja84.pdf [17OCT2004]

A BIT OF HISTORY: "...CITATION - 01JAN84 - 31MAR85..." Contributed by CARPENTER, CTOCS(AW) Ed ecarp@iserv.net [21MAY2001]
UNITED STATES SEVENTH FLEET
The Commander Seventh Fleet takes pleasure in commending Commander Fleet Air Reconnassiance Squadron ONE for service as set forth in the following:
CITATION
"For meritorious service while conducting sensitive reconnaissance operations between 1 January 1984 and 31 March 1985. Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron ONE performed superbly in every endeavor, significantly improving intelligence data bases and dramatically increasing SEVENTH Fleet's Electronic Warfare capabilities. The squadron's indepth knowledge, real time Indicators and Warning (I and W) coverage, and subsequent detailed and accurate post mission reporting kept all operational commanders within the Western Pacific and Indian Oceans continually aware of the threat of. Soviet and other communist capabilities and activities. The superb coverage by Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron ONE EP-3's and EA-3's of two Team Spirit exercises and FLEETEX-85 provided Battle Group and Battle Force Commanders with intelligence that was vital to the conduct of these exercises. Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron ONE demonstrated the ability to perform its wartime mission on a dally basis in numerous potentially hostile environments on the fringes of unfriendly territory. The selfless dedication to duty and unmatched professionalism of the officers and enlisted personnel of Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron ONE were in keeping with the highest traditions of the United States Naval Service."
Signed PAUL F. McCAR Vice Admiral United States Navy
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...Miscellaneous Photo's..." Contributed by CARPENTER, CTOCS(AW) Ed ecarp@iserv.net [21MAY2001]
 VQ-1 09JAN85 "...VQ-1 Commanding Officer CDR Mitchell (Died in A3 off Guam with loss of nine crewmen - bad hydralics)..."
 VQ-1 25SEP8? "...VQ-1 Intel Boss CDR Sydes..."
 VQ-1 02NOV83 "...VQ-1 Commanding Officer CDR Hughes..."
 VQ-1 Det Atsugi "...TOP: 06FEB84...BOTTOM: 03OCT83..."
 VQ-1 Det Atsugi "...TOP: 15MAY84...BOTTOM: 03OCT83..."
 Miscellaneous "...TOP: 12MAR86 Air Warfare Class...BOTTOM: 04DEC85..."
Circa 1983
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...MERITORIOUS UNIT COMMENDATION - 01SEP83 - 05NOV83..." Contributed by CARPENTER, CTOCS(AW) Ed ecarp@iserv.net [21MAY2001]
THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY WASHINGTON
The Secretary of the Navy takes pleasure in presenting the MERITORIOUS UNIT COMMENDATION to
TASK FORCE SEVENTY-ONE (KOREAN AIRLINES FLIGHT KAL 007'SEARRCH AND RESCUE/SALVAGE OPERATIONS) for service as set forth in the following . CITATION:
For meritorious service while attached to the SEVENTH Fleet and operating integral to Task Force SEVENTY-ONE from 1 September 1983 to 5 November 1983. While conducting search and salvage operations for Korean Airlines Flight KAL 007 in response to national taskings and operating close to the Soviet Islands Sakhaiin and Moneron in the Tartar Strait and Northern Sea of Japan, Task Force SBVENTY-ONE superbly carried out its humanitarian mission despite severe climatic conditions and frequent Soviet harrassment and obstruction. Low temperatures and high seas relentlessly harrassed personnel, equipment; and ships. Soviet insensitivity to international sanction to the shootdown and the intense proximity of United -States and chartered ships to claimed international waters spurted active Soviet efforts to frustrate, obstruct, and discredit Task Force SEVENTY-ONE which nonetheless meticulously completed a precision search of over 225 square miles of ocean floor. Exceptional shiphandling and intrepid professional response avoided even the occasion of an incident between the Soviet Union and the United States. By their sustained superior performance, steadfast initiative, and unswerving devotion to duty, the officers, enlisted personnel, and civilian employees of Task Force SEVENTY-ONE (Korean Airlines Flight KAL 007 Search and Rescue/Salvage Operations) reflected credit upon'themselves and upheld the highest traditions of the Marine Corps and the United States Naval Service.
Signed Secretary of the Navy
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...MERITORIOUS UNIT COMMENDATION - 01JAN83-01JAN84..." Contributed by CARPENTER, CTOCS(AW) Ed ecarp@iserv.net [21MAY2001]
THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY WASHINGTON
The Secretary of the Navy takes pleasure in presenting the
MERITORIOUS UNIT COMMENDATION to FLEET AIR RECONNAISSANCE SQUADRON ONE
for service as set forth in the following
CITATION:
For meritorious service in the performance of surveillance and reconnaissance operations in support of the U.S. SEVENTH Fleet and National Command Authorities from 1 January 1983 to 1 January 1984. During this period, Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron ONE and supporting units provided critical intelligence, frequently a sole reporting source, and proved to be a vital element in Fleet defense and joint services collection operations. Staging from aircraft carriers . and multiple land based locations throughout the Pacific Ocean and Indian Theaters, Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron ONE and associated Naval Security Group Personnel made highly significant intelligence contributions during arduous deployments, often involving extended periods of around-the-clock support, and in spite of adverse personnel and asset limitations. By their exceptional display of professionalism, extraordinary determination, and steadfast devotion to duty, the officers, enlisted personnel, and civilian employees of Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron ONE reflected credit upon themselves and upheld the highest traditions of the United States Naval Service.
Signed Secretary of the Navy
Circa 1982
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...P-3 Orion Twenty Years Young - Page 14 to 18 - Naval Aviation News - August 1982..." WebSite: http://www.history.navy.mil/nan/backissues/1980s/1982/aug82.pdf [15OCT2004]
Circa 1981
A BIT OF HISTORY:  VQ-1 History "...1981 aboard the USS Constellation..." Contributed by Paul Jarvis vaq134@cox.net [11FEB2008]
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...USS Constellation in 1981 featuring VQ-1 DET Bravo..." Contributed by Paul Jarvis vaq134@cox.net [23DEC2007]
Photograph's Top Row Left-to-Right:Launch, Closeup Lowres, Launch, Closeup, Closeup and Closeup
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...A-3 photo's I personally took while in the Navy. The aircraft are from VQ-1 DET bravo off the Connie in 1981..." Contributed by Paul Jarvis vaq134@cox.net [03DEC2007]
Circa 1979
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...History - Awards - Page 3, 23, 26 to 27 - Naval Aviation News - May 1979..." WebSite: http://www.history.navy.mil/nan/backissues/1970s/1979/may79.pdf [10OCT2004]

Circa 1978
A BIT OF HISTORY:  VQ-1 Patch Contributed by Tom Grannis grannis1@earthlink.net [27APR2004]
Circa 1976
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...CNO Safety Awards - Page 5 - Naval Aviation News - December 1976..." WebSite: http://www.history.navy.mil/nan/backissues/1970s/1976/dec76.pdf [07OCT2004]

Circa 1975
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...CNO Awards - Page 3 - Naval Aviation News - November 1975..." WebSite: http://www.history.navy.mil/nan/backissues/1970s/1975/nov75.pdf [04OCT2004]

A BIT OF HISTORY:  VQ-1 Patch Contributed by Tom Grannis grannis1@earthlink.net [21DEC2003]
Circa 1974
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...Awards - Page 19 - Naval Aviation News - February 1974..." WebSite: http://www.history.navy.mil/nan/backissues/1970s/1974/feb74.pdf [30SEP2004]

Circa 1973
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...Crossroads Of The Pacific - Page 34 to 39 - Naval Aviation News - January 1973..." WebSite: http://www.history.navy.mil/nan/backissues/1970s/1973/jan73.pdf [28SEP2004]
Circa 1972
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...Squadron Insignia - Naval Aviation News - October 1972..." WebSite: http://www.history.navy.mil/nan/backissues/1970s/1972/oct72.pdf [27SEP2004]

Circa 1971
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...VW-1 Disestablished - Page 4 - Naval Aviation News - July 1971..." WebSite: http://www.history.navy.mil/nan/backissues/1970s/1971/jul71.pdf [23SEP2004]
Circa 1970
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...My father was LT(jg) George Iwasko, Jr. He was an AEW (Airborne Early Warning) Officer aboard the EP-3C with VQ-1. He was stationed at NAS Agana, Guam during the early to mid 1970's. I was very young at the time between 4-7 years old. I remember alot actually of going to the base and seeing the Orions and super connie's. I also remember my father pushing me up into a " Whale" A-3 Skywarrior. I remember them fondley. I have aquired alot of squadron photos. I would like to share them with other members. My father was also a member of VQ-2 back when they flew EC-130's. Here are a few of my Father's photograph's..." Contributed by Christopher Iwasko chrisiwasko@hotmail.com [17MAY2010]
Circa 1969
A BIT OF HISTORY:  VQ-1 History "...FASU/NSA DaNang, Republic of Vietnam VQ-1 Det Bravo enlisted men's club in between two of the Det Barracks - Circa 1969..." Contributed by KONSTENIUS, AO2 Stephen A. skonstenius@yahoo.com [19MAY2010]
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...I was with "Q" when PR-24 was shot down by North Korean Migs in April of 69. All Hands lost. LtCdr Overstreet, plane commander. Nixon reveals best keep secret to all the world. "US has electronic gadgets that can read what other nations radars are reporting", as stated in time Magazine dated April 25, 1969. I had the honor to make one of the early shake down flights in our brand new (look at all the lights, no toggles, lots of push buttons and look at all the lights) EP-3A, PR-31. And that retractable dome, what a pain in the a#!!....Stationed in Atsugi, Japan (actually it was a small town called Yamotto, don't hold me to that spelling) with a detachment in Danang. I was an aircrew member and had time in the three types of AC we had during my tenure; EC-121, A-3, and the then new arrival the P-3. However, My favorite ride was the "Connies" and I accumulated over 1800 hours in the type. Nothing like a hot meal and a good game of Acey-Ducey between shifts. My first couple of years in the regular Navy were spent in VS-36 and VS-24 out of Norfolk, Va. with S-2. I was a plane captain then. After leaving the active Navy in Jan. of 1970, I was stationed at NAS Willow Grove, Pennsylvania as a Reservist flying in P-2V and later P-3A/B. I was discharged from the service in 1979...." Contributed by Bill Kirner billkirner@aol.com
Circa 1968
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...CNO Safety Awards Announced - Page 2 - Naval Aviation News - October 1968..." WebSite: http://www.history.navy.mil/nan/backissues/1960s/1968/oct68.pdf [15SEP2004]
Circa 1966
A BIT OF HISTORY:  NAS Naha "...VQ-1's EP-3B BuNo: 149678 in Phase Maintenance Check at NAF Naha, Okinawa, Japan in October of 1966!..." Contributed by NETTLES, Bullet Bob bulletbob_1@email.msn.com [13FEB2003]
A BIT OF HISTORY:  NAS Naha "...VQ-1's EP-3B BuNo: 149678 leaving NAF Naha, Okinawa, Japan after about four days in check! It always came in the night, and Left just before dark! All I can say is, they were headed for parts Unknown to most of us at the time, taken in October of 1966!..." Contributed by NETTLES, Bullet Bob bulletbob_1@email.msn.com [13FEB2003]
Circa 1965
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...Squadron Awards..." Contributed by Mahlon K. Miller mkwsmiller@cox.net [23APR2001]
Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal 01 Oct 71 – 31 Dec 71 01 Apr 72 – 31 Mar 73 29 Apr 75 – 30 Apr 75 01 Jul 97 – 30 Sep 97
Humanitarian Service Medal 29 Apr 75 – 30 Apr 75 21 May 76 – 15 Jun 76
Meritorious Unit Commendation 01 Dec 78 – 07 Jan 80 01 Jan 83 – 01 Jan 84 01 Jan 85 – 05 Oct 86 01 Jan 88 – 01 Dec 89 01 Jul 92 – 21 Jan 93 01 Dec 95 – 31 Oct 96 01 May 98 – 30 Apr 99
Navy Unit Commendation 22 May 64 – 30 Nov 65 01 Dec 65 – 30 Nov 67 01 Dec 67 – 01 Dec 69
Other (Unspecified award) 01 Oct 89 – 01 May 92
Republic of Vietnam Meritorious Unit Citation (Gallantry) 01 Apr 67 – 20 Sep 69
Southwest Asia Service Medal 8 Aug 90 – 10 Mar 91
VQ-1 (TG 72.5) Meritorious Unit Commendation 22 Apr 75 – 07 May 75
VQ-1 Det 3 Humanitarian Service Medal 23 Oct 82
VQ-1 Det Alameda Flight Personnel Meritorious Unit Commendation 01 Jan 83 – 01 Jan 84
VQ-1 Det Alameda Participating Personnel Meritorious Unit Commendation 01 Jan 83 – 01 Jan 84
VQ-1 Det Alfa Navy Expeditionary Service Medal 02 Apr 87 – 26 Jun 87 Meritorious Unit Commendation 27 Jul 82 – 01 May 84 21 Jan 87 – 17 May 87
VQ-1 Det Alpha Navy Unit Commendation 01 Jan 78 – 30 Jun 79
VQ-1 Det Atsugi Flight Personnel Meritorious Unit Commendation 01 Dec 78 – 07 Jan 80 01 Jan 83 – 01 Jan 84 01 Sep 83 – 05 Nov 83
VQ-1 Det Atsugi Japan Meritorious Unit Commendation 16 Aug 77 – 08 Sep 77
VQ-1 Det B Meritorious Unit Commendation 12 Mar 79 – 19 Apr 79 Republic of Vietnam Meritorious Unit Citation (Gallantry) 01 Jul 67 – 01 Dec 68
VQ-1 Det B in Danang Republic of Vietnam Meritorious Unit Citation (Gallantry) 21 Nov 68 – 21 Nov 70
VQ-1 Det Bahrain Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal 01 Jul 97 – 30 Sep 97
VQ-1 Det Bravo Navy Expeditionary Service Medal 24 Jun 87 – 23 Jul 87 Meritorious Unit Commendation 13 Nov 79 – 08 Feb 80 12 Jan 86 – 13 Aug 86 Navy Unit Commendation 23 Jan 80 – 01 May 80
VQ-1 Det Bravo Flight Personnel Meritorious Unit Commendation 01 Dec 78 – 07 Jan 80
VQ-1 Det Charlie Meritorious Unit Commendation 01 Jan 83 – 01 Jan 84 10 Nov 84 – 07 May 85 16 Jan 87 – 02 Feb 87
VQ-1 Det Charlie Participating Personnel Meritorious Unit Commendation 01 Jan 83 – 01 Jan 84
VQ-1 Det Cubi Point Flight Personnel Meritorious Unit Commendation 01 Jan 83 – 01 Jan 84
VQ-1 Det Cubi Point Participating Personnel Meritorious Unit Commendation 01 Jan 83 – 01 Jan 84
VQ-1 Det Cubi Point RP Humanitarian Service Medal 22 Apr 75 – 06 Jul 75
VQ-1 Det D Humanitarian Service Medal 20 Mar 81
VQ-1 Det Danang Meritorious Unit Commendation 01 Apr 72 – 27 Jan 73 Republic of Vietnam Meritorious Unit Citation (Gallantry) 04 Oct 67 – 04 Feb 68 Vietnam Service Medal 04 Jul 65 – 27 Jan 73
VQ-1 Det Echo Navy Unit Commendation 17 Jan 91 – 07 Feb 91
VQ-1 Det Misawa Flight Personnel Meritorious Unit Commendation 04 Apr 83 – 20 Apr 83 10 Jun 83 – 15 Jun 83
VQ-1 Det OF Navy Unit Commendation Spring 70
VQ-1 Det RANGER Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal 29 Aug 87 – 24 Nov 87
VQ-1 Det Shemya Flight Personnel Meritorious Unit Commendation 06 Apr 83 – 16 Apr 83
VQ-1 Det SWA Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal 01 Dec 92 – 31 Mar 93 01 Dec 95 – 31 Mar 96 Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal 01 Jan 97 – 30 Jun 97 01 Jul 97 – 30 Sep 97 01 Oct 97 – 31 Dec 97 01 Jan 98 – 31 Mar 98
VQ-1 Det Guam Humanitarian Service Medal 23 Apr 75 – 01 Sep 75
VQ-1 Participating Aircrews Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal 01 Oct 66 – 31 Mar 73 Navy Expeditionary Service Medal 08 Dec 78 – 06 Jun 79 25 Nov 79 – 31 Mar 81
VQ-1 Participating Crewmembers Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal 01 Apr 98 – 30 Jun 98
Circa 1959
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...JUL59 or 16JUN59--A P4M of VQ-1, attacked near to Korean peninsula by MiG-15s. Damaged, one wounded crewmember." http://www.csd.uwo.ca/~pettypi/elevon/gustin_military/shotdown.html
Circa 1958
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...VQ-1 Pilots Fly The TV-2 - Page 34 - Naval Aviation News - January 1958..." WebSite: http://www.history.navy.mil/nan/backissues/1950s/1958/jan58.pdf [12AUG2004]
Circa 1957
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...VQ-1 Develops 'Sniffer' - Page 33 - Naval Aviation News - April 1957..." WebSite: http://www.history.navy.mil/nan/backissues/1950s/1957/apr57.pdf [10AUG2004]
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...VQ-1 Crewman Training- Page 22 - Naval Aviation News - February 1957..." WebSite: http://www.history.navy.mil/nan/backissues/1950s/1957/feb57.pdf [10AUG2004]
Circa 1956
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...From 1945 to 1969, U.S. Navy aircraft were involved in a number of aerial incidents with forces of the Soviet Union, People’s Republic of China, North Korea, and Czechoslovakia. These incidents resulted in the loss of eight Navy aircraft and one Coast Guard aircraft, eighty-one Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard aviators and crewman, and several aircraft damaged and crewmen wounded and injured. The list below, compiled from official and unofficial sources, does not include aircraft lost in direct action in the Korean and Vietnam wars, nor aircraft shot down by Chinese forces in the vicinity of Vietnam in connection with that war..." Naval Historical Center, Department Of The Navy, Washington, D. C http://www.history.navy.mil/branches/dictvol2.htm [06MAY2001]
22 Aug 1956 P4M-1Q VQ-1 While on a patrol mission from NAS Iwakuni, Japan, this aircraft (BuNo 124362) disappeared at night after reporting an attack by hostile aircraft 32 miles off the coast of China (near Wenchow) and 180 miles north of Formosa. There were no survivors of the 16-man crew. Wreckage and one body were recovered by Dennis J. Buckley(DDR 808).
16 Jun 1959 P4M-1Q VQ-1 While flying a patrol mission over the Sea of Japan, this aircraft (BuNo 122209) was attacked 50 miles east of the Korean DMZ by two North Korean MiGs. During the attack, the aircraft sustained serious damage to the starboard engines and the tailgunner was seriously wounded. The P4M made it safely to Miho AFB, Japan.
15 Apr 1969 EC-121M VQ-1 While flying a patrol mission over the Sea of Japan, this aircraft (BuNo 135749) was attacked 90 miles off the coast of Korea by North Korean fighters. All 31 crewmen were lost during the attack. Two bodies and some wreckage were recovered by search vessels.
Circa 1955
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...01 JUN 55 - VQ-1, the first squadron of its type in the U.S. Navy, was established at NAS Iwakuni, Japan, with Lieutenant Commander Eugene R. Hall in command. First aircraft assigned were P4M-1Q Mercators..." http://www.history.navy.mil/avh-1910/PART08.PDF [28MAY2003]
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...01JUN55--Electronic Countermeasures Squadron 1 (VQ-1), first squadron of its type in the U.S. Navy, was established at NAS Iwakuni, Japan, with Lieutenant Commander Eugene R. Hall in command. First aircraft assigned were P4M-1Q Mercators..." http://history.navy.mil/branches/avchr8.htm [11DEC98]
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...01JUL55--Electronic Countermeasures Squadron 1 (VQ-1), first squadron of its type in the U.S. Navy, was established at NAS Iwakuni, Japan, with Lieutenant Commander Eugene R. Hall in command. First aircraft assigned were P4M-1Q Mercators..." http://www.history.navy.mil/branches/avchr7.htm
Circa 1951 - 1994
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...VQ-1 "WORLD WATCHER" HISTORY..." WebSite: VQ-1 http://vq-1.ahf.nmci.navy.mil/ [12MAR2008]
The lineage of VQ-1's "World Watchers" can be traced back to two PBY-5A Catalina "Black Cats" modified for electronic reconnaissance during World War II. The unit formally established as the Special Electronic Search Project at NS Sangley Point, Philippines, in October 1951. By 13 May 1953, when it was redesignated Detachment Able of Airborne Early Warning Squadron One (VW-1), the unit operated four P4M-1Q Mercator aircraft.
When Detachment Able was reorganized into Electronic Countermeasures Squadron One (VQ-1) at NAS Iwakuni, Japan on 1 June 1955, it was the first squadron dedicated to electronic warfare. The A-3 Skywarrior, or "Whale" as it came to be known, served the squadron for the next three decades. In 1960, not only was VQ-1 moved to NAS Atsugi, Japan and redesignated Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron ONE, but the last Mercator was retired and replaced by the first of many WV-2Q Super Constellations. The "Willie Victor" would remain the backbone of VQ-1's long range, land-based reconnaissance efforts through the Vietnam Era and into the 1970's.
The squadron's involvement in the Vietnam War started characteristically, at the very beginning when a Skywarrior crew was awarded the Navy Unit Commendation for their role in the Gulf of Tonkin incident of 2 - 5 August 1964. For the next nine years, VQ-1 would operate from FASU/NSA DaNang, Republic of Vietnam, NAS Cubi Point, Philippines, Bangkok, aircraft carriers on patrol in Yankee Station and other bases in Southeast Asia. VQ-1's aircrews supported countless air strikes and are credited with assisting in the destruction of numerous MIG aricraft and Komar patrol boats. The first EP-3 Aries I joined the squadron in 1969, beginning the replacement program for the Super Constellations, which was competed in 1974. In 1971, the VQ-1 moved its homeport to NAS Agana, Guam. At that time it absorbed Heavy Photographic Squadron SIXTY ONE (VAP-61) and its former parent unit, VW-1. For a time VQ-1 consisted of thirty aircraft: sixteen Skywarriors, twelve Super Constellations and two Orions.
After the departure of the last Skywarrior in the late 1980's, the squadron flew the EP-3 Aries I exclusively. In 1991 the squadron closed its permanent detachment in NAS Atsugi, Japan after 30 years and moved it to NAF Misawa, Japan. In the same year, VQ-1 received the first EP-3E Aries II, an upgraded version of the Aries I using modified P-3C airframes. The squadron played a key role in Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm. Despite the harsh, difficult maintenance environment and 30 year old aircraft, VQ-1 amassed nearly 1400 combat flight hours with a 100% mission completion rate. Tasking included strike support, combat search and rescue, communications and over-the-horizon-targeting support to coalition forces.
In 1994, as a result of the base closure of NAS Agana, Guam, VQ-1 was notified of the homeport change to NAS Whidbey Island, Washington. Coincidentally, in July 1994, VQ-1 retired the Navy's oldest operational P-3, EP-3E Aries I BUNO 148887. Its retirement also marked VQ-1's transition to all EP-3E AIRIES II mission aircraft.
Circa 1951 - 1987
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...A History of U. S. navy Fleet Air Reconnaissance - Part I and II - The Pacific and VQ-1 By Captain Don C. East, USN - (VQ-2 also included)..." WebSite: The Cold War Museum http://www.coldwar.org/ [17DEC2008]

Author's Preface
To my knowledge this is the initial attempt to produce a written history of the U.S. Navy's two Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadrons, VQ-1 and VQ-2. It is the story of a highly dedicated group of men and women who seem to be permanently relegated to second-class citizen status within Naval Aviation even though their product has been repeatedly praised by operational commanders as the "vital force multiplier". Yes, this is the story of the U.S. Navy's own "band of gypsies"; experts in the art of community survival and "midnight small stores", who produce a first-class product with "hand-me-down" aircraft and equipment.
The small size of the airborne electronic reconnaissance community, and the classified nature of its squadron operations, have discouraged past attempts to tell this story. Consequently, little published information could be found for this undertaking. The squadron history summaries were infrequently submitted and were of little value because the "classified mission" waiver usually resulted in a blank narrative section. Fortunately, the few narratives that were completed (now declassified), provided some crucial information. The majority of the information for this VQ-1/VQ-2 history, however, came from dusty cruise boxes and the memories of the community's "old timers". The gaps were filled in by the author's personal recollections of 30 years in the reconnaissance business and numerous weekends in the extensive Naval War College library at Newport.
The Requirement
Tactical commanders tasked with carrying out the fundamental war fighting tasks of the U.S. Navy always require the most accurate and timely information available. This information can be provided through reconnaissance of potentially hostile forces on, under or above the seas, and in related littoral land areas. Therefore, capabilities are needed to collect, process and evaluate various types of information relative to the activities and intentions of these potentially hostile forces. These capabilities must function in a manner which is sufficiently timely to satisfy the immediate needs of the tactical commanders.
Since the advent of electronics, warfare has become increasingly complex. Specifically, in the years since World. War Two, there has been a dramatic explosion of electronic technology and it shows all indications of continuing into the foreseeable future. Today it is difficult to point to any aspect of warfare, whether it be air, sea or land, that does not involve electronics in some manner. The electronics associated with sensors and weapon systems invariably involve the transmission of signals in the electromagnetic spectrum. By observing foreign military operations through the collection and analysis of these electromagnetic signals, the Navy has developed and maintained a unique and highly technical capability. Electromagnetic signals exploitation, and the associated timely reporting of this information, has proven to be operationally critical. A tactical commander must be provided with such timely information to update his understanding of who is out there, where they are, the composition of their force, the capability of the force, the intentions of the force, when they are likely to carry out these intentions and what is their state of operational readiness. An effective signal exploitation system is capable of collecting data relevant to all these questions, processing and correlating the data to assess its tactical significance and rapidly passing the synthesized product to the user.
Because of certain basic characteristics, the fixed-wing aircraft is a prime platform for the electronic reconnaissance mission. First of all, the aircraft has the mobility and speed to allow rapid movement to the area of operations. Second, the aircraft has an operating altitude which allows it to take advantage of the line-of-sight nature (radio horizon limitations) of signals above the HF portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. Third, aircraft have the range and endurance to transit considerable distances and remain on station for extended periods of time. Fourth, aircraft have the payload capacity to carry considerable quantities of equipment and sizeable operating crews. With these basic qualities of a fixed-wing aircraft platform, a highly skilled and professional aircrew can effectively collect, distill, correlate, synthesize and transmit the collected intelligence required by the supported commander for timely tactical decision making.
The Beginnings
The story of the Navy's airborne electronic reconnaissance squadrons began in the great global struggle of WWII. Just as it was a war of destructive, or "hard kill" weapons, it was also an electronic or "soft kill" war. Sir Winston Churchill recognized the latter and termed it the "Wizard War".
Even before entry into the conflict, America recognized that a combination of the military, civilian industry and scientific communities was urgently needed to conduct research and development for the electronic war. The need became a reality when President Roosevelt directed the creation of the National Defense Research Committee (NDRC) in June 1940. In turn NDRC formed the United States Radiation Laboratory at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology four months later. Since the U.S. had very little information on radar development in Japan or Germany, the radiation laboratory was tasked with development of U.S. radar, as well as countermeasures for enemy radar systems.
The Navy became directly involved in the soft kill solution only four days after the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor, when a preliminary meeting was held to discuss formation of a U.S. organization devoted solely to the development of radio countermeasures. In short order a formal conference was held between the Navy and NDRC resulting in establishment of the Radio Research Laboratory (RRL) within the Radiation Laboratory at MIT. From these beginnings came the first intercept receiver built for airborne use, the P-540, which later evolved into the SCR-587 and finally the APR-l.
Although considerable progress had been made by the British in their "Wizard War" in Europe by early 1942, there were no serious studies of enemy radar in the Pacific. But the fortunate capture of a Japanese radar system on NAB Henderson/Carney Field, Guadalcanal caused great interest and effort to be expended on electronic reconnaissance in the Pacific Theater.
 (Photo: The first US. Navy airborne electronic recon missions were flown from NAB Henderson/Carney Field, Guadalcanal in 5th Bomb Group B-17Es in late 1942. Courtesy Fred Johnson) Meanwhile, the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) at Anacostia had been involved to some degree in radar and radio experiments since the 1920s. By 1942, NRL's efforts had resulted in the production of a few crude crystal-type intercept receivers suitable for airborne use. These receivers, designated XARD, had a frequency coverage of 50-1,000 MHz. In a crash program to get a Navy airborne electronic reconnaissance capability to the Pacific, six radioman petty officers were selected to attend a two-week cram course on the new XARD system in September 1942. These men had just completed the Radio Material School near Anacostia. After their training on the XARD they were formed into a detachment designated Cast Mike Project NR 1 (Cast Mike for countermeasures) and, with their new equipment, transferred to Hawaii. Two of these men, Chief Petty Officer Jack Churchill as POIC and Petty Officer Robert Russell, soon departed Hawaii for the Pacific War Zone. The Cast Mike team arrived at headquarters, Commander Air South Pacific, on NOB Espiritu Santo, New Hebrides Islands in early October.
The mode of operation at NOB Espiritu Santo, New Hebrides Islands for the Cast Mike team was to "hitch hike" themselves and their experimental electronic recon- naissance equipment on any aircraft large enough for the "extra bag- gage", and whose mission profile was generally compatible with that of conducting reconnaissance.
The Initial Missions
Churchill and Russell soon had their XARD Receiver installed in an Army Air Force B-17 of the 11th Bomb Group. Chief Churchill flew with the first B-17 electronic reconnaissance mission 31 October 1942 from NOB Espiritu Santo, New Hebrides Islands to NAB Henderson/Carney Field, Guadalcanal, Bougainville and return. Unfortunately for such a historic occasion, no Japanese radar signals were intercepted. During the next month seven more B-17 electronic reconnaissance missions were flown to the Solomons and New Britain but still no enemy radar signals were detected. Whether this lack of signal intercept was a result of the primitive XARD equipment or a paucity of Japanese radars in the region is not clear.
In December 1942 Churchill and Russell began flying their XARD receivers on PBY-5 seaplanes of VP-72. The Navy Catalinas operating in this theater were painted black and primarily flew at night. The Cast Mike team hitchhiked missions with VP-72 from NAB Henderson/Carney Field, Guadalcanal and NOB Espiritu Santo, New Hebrides Islands, performing electronic recce around the Solomon Islands. Although the Cast Mike gypsies continued their airborne electronic reconnaissance missions throughout the remainder of 1942, using B-17s and PBYs, no Japanese radar signals were intercepted by their XARD receivers.
Parallel U.S. Army Air Force Operations
Meanwhile, the Army Air Force was dedicating considerably more funding and personnel to its embryonic electronic reconnaissance effort. Instead of a ragtag band of nomads who hitchhiked on aircraft belonging to other units, the AAF developed a coherent program which would soon pay dividends. While RRL was designing and fabricating the first production airborne electronic reconnaissance equipment in the fall of 1942, the Army established a four-week radio countermeasures course at the Airborne Radar School in NAS Boca Chica, Florida. Upon graduation these officers were designated Radio Observers. At this same time the AAF Chief of Staff, GEN Hap Arnold, directed the initiation of a crash program to develop a dedicated airborne electronic reconnaissance capability. This project, code named Ferret, turned out to be a modified B-24D Liberator equipped with the SCR-587 receiver and a developmental version of a radar pulse analyzer. The pulse analyzer became a vital tool to assist the airborne operators in identifying the type of enemy radar being intercepted.
 (Photo: Cast Mike team became a band of electronic gypsies "hitch-hiking" missions with various squadrons operating in the Solomons area. Early missions were flown with VP-72 in PBY-5 Catalinas, one of thefirst "Black Cat" squadrons which won fame for their night operations in the Pacific. PBY-5 carries underwing Yagi antennae during takeoff run in late '42. Black Cat squadrons later painted their aircraft all black for their nocturnal forays. SNTailhook yp 0178 courtesy Hal Andrews)
After its completion in February 1943, the modified B-24 Ferret, with two Boca Raton radio countermeasures course graduates on board, deployed to NAS Adak, Alaska. On 6 March the B-24 flew the first successful AAF electronic reconnaissance mission, gaining valuable data on Japanese radars installed on the Aleutian Island of Kiska. The success of this initial AAF program soon led to a second-generation platform. This time, a few B-17s were acquired and fitted with the latest equipment available from RRL efforts, including the APR-l and the newer APR-3 wide band receivers, pulse analyzers and most importantly, a direction finding (DF) capability. Although this initial airborne DF capability was crude, it allowed the aircrew to obtain several lines of bearing on the intercepted radar signal so that its location could be determined.
 (Photo: By Nov 1943, Cast Mike had been expanded to include several teams in the Pacific and began operations with VP-104 PB4Y Liberators at NAB Henderson/Carney Field, Guadalcanal) Meanwhile, back state side, on 24 May 1943, the Navy organized Special Project Unit Cast at NAS Squantum, Massachusetts, under a Bureau of Aeronautics directive. The unit was to provide services for flight testing the electronic equipment under development at the Radio Research Laboratory. Perhaps the Navy finally recognized the failure of the XARD in its wartime OpEval and decided to conduct realistic airborne tests on future equipment before deploying to the war zone!
Early in 1943 the Cast Mike team in the Pacific received a few ARC-1 receivers (Navy version of SCR-587); a vast improvement over the experimental XARD system. Chief Churchill and PO Russell had continued their missions with the Catalina squadrons in the South Pacific. On the night of 18 June, while flying with a VP-54 crew, they acquired their first intercept of a Japanese radar. The enemy signal was intercepted while flying near the Shortland Islands, just south of Bougainville. Unfortunately, the Navy had not provided the Cast Mike team with an airborne DF capability like that of the AAF; therefore it was impossible for Churchill to pinpoint the location of his all-important initial radar intercept.
With no prospect of acquiring airborne DF equipment in the near future, Churchill and his team did what VQ squadrons continue to do even today in their "special projects" or "bicycle shops"- improvise their own capability. Assisted by VP-54 metal smiths, they constructed a pair of yagi-type directional antennas which they installed on either side of the Catalina's nose, pointing forward. The "Rube Goldberg" antennas were then connected through a receiver switching assembly to a cathode ray tube (CRT) display unit where the signal strength could be interpreted by the operator as being to the left or right of the aircraft. Through coordination between the PBY pilot and the Cast Mike operator, the aircraft could be steered until it was pointing directly toward the intercepted radar site. At this point, a line of bearing would be logged. After repeating this procedure at several geographically separated points, a reasonable fix of the radar site could be calculated.
On the night of 8 September 1943, the Cast Mike and VP-54 team obtained three good lines of bearing on the Japanese radar signal and established its position on Poporang Island south of Bougainville. Following this initial successful mission, a photographic recon- naissance aircraft obtained photographs of the enemy radar site, which was then attacked by fighter-bombers. After their long and arduous struggle to prove the concept of USN airborne electronic reconnaissance, Chief Churchill and his Cast Mike Project NR 1 team were disbanded in the fall of 1943. However this unique band of gypsies, operating with begged, borrowed, stolen and improvised equipment, while flying on "other folks" aircraft, had nevertheless performed a major service to their country and to the future of U.S. Navy airborne electronic reconnaissance. Many years later, in recounting his experience as an airborne electronic reconnaissance operator, CDR Jack Churchill commented that he had "started my Navy career in electronic intelligence and when I retired I was still in electronic intelligence."
In the place of the Cast Mike team, the Navy slightly upped the ante in airborne electronic reconnaissance by organizing several teams of aircrew officers to carry out much the same program accomplished by Churchill and his men. These officer teams continued the marginally-satisfactory procedure of temporarily installing and operating radar intercept equipment in resident Navy patrol (VP) or patrol bomber (VPB) aircraft.
One of those team members was LT Lawrence Heron who, with another officer, reported to NAB Henderson/Carney Field, Guadalcanal in November 1943. There they joined VPB-104, flying PBY-l Liberators. Circumstances were not much different for LT Heron than they had been for Churchill. Heron still had to fabricate his own installation rigs to enable the APR-l receivers and other equipment to be transferred from one aircraft to another. As unbelievable as it may seem, there was still insufficient support within the Navy for the electronic reconnaissance mission to acquire even a few dedicated aircraft solely for the task.
Late in 1943 a major event occurred when a new headquarters unit was formed in the Southwest Pacific Theater for coordination of Allied electronic reconnaissance. The new unit, designated Section 22 of General Headquarters, included personnel of all U.S. military services along with British, Australian, New Zealand and Dutch allies. Section 22 was responsible for collecting information on enemy radar and radio systems, analysis, dissemination of the resulting intelligence and requisitioning and assigning electronic countermeasures/reconnaissance personnel and equipment. The need for such an organization in the theater had been evident for some time. By mid-1943 USAAF B-24 Ferret aircraft had been assigned to the Southwest Pacific Theater, and shortly thereafter Section 22 was beginning to assemble a detailed picture of the Japanese radar network in the area. Section 22 would quickly note the more effective operations of the "dedicated" AAF Ferrets and soon force the Navy into a similar mode of operation.
Meanwhile, as the momentum of the war in the Pacific swung to the Allies and our ground forces began the island-hopping advance toward Japan in early 1944, airborne electronic reconnaissance joined the northward migration. In March 1944 VPB-116, based on recently- captured Eniwetok Atoll, began flying electronic reconnaissance missions around the strategic Japanese naval base at Truk in the Caroline Islands. The VPB-116 PBY-ls, with their electronic reconnaissance "hitchhikers", were tasked to locate and collect information on Truk's radar installations. This data proved extremely valuable during the following carrier air strikes on the atoll.
The Navy is Dragged into the Future
By spring of 1944 it became painfully clear that the AAF's permanently modified Ferret aircraft, entirely dedicated to the mission of electronic reconnaissance, were markedly more effective than the Navy's makeshift installations operated by the "gypsy" air crewmen. In recognition of this glaring fact Section 22 directed the formation of a dedicated Navy unit, where all its personnel, equipment and aircraft would be responsible solely for the electronic recce role.
The Navy selected an old hand to form and lead this new dedicated airborne electronic reconnaissance unit, LT Lawrence Heron. The new unit was temporarily based at the Palm Island seaplane base near Townsville, Australia, and equipped with two PBY-5A Black Cats to be modified for electronic reconnaissance.
The Consolidated PBY seaplane entered service in 1936 and became the Navy's principal patrol bomber. The amphibious PBY-5A was the model primarily employed for electronic, reconnaissance. It was powered by two 1,200-hp engines, cruising at 95 kts with a service ceiling of 13,000 ft and had a crew of 7 to 9.
The installation of the ARC-l receivers in the Catalina was simple enough, but again, the direction-finding antenna system had to be locally manufactured. Because of the location of the new DF antenna, pointing downward from the rear fuselage gun hatch, the PBY could not take off with the system in place. Instead, it had to be manually attached after takeoff, which created some interesting and exciting situations for LT Heron's crews.
>(Photo: Continuing their association with the patrol squadrons throughout the war; the teams increased their capabilities with the PBY-2 Privateer flying first with VPB-116 in the spring of 1945. The Privateer became the mainstay of the Navy's dedicated AER missions until relieved in the early '50s by the P4M-IQ.)
After the Navy had been more or less forced to dedicate a few aircraft and men to the function of electronic reconnaissance, on 13 May 1944, CNO directed the Chief of Naval Air Technical Training to establish a training pipeline for the new mission. The facility was to be called the Special Projects School for Air and was assigned to NAAS San Clemente Island, off San Diego, Calif., with training to commence 1 June 1944.
Meanwhile, back in the Pacific, Heron completed the modifications and moved his Black Cats to NAF Biak Atoll, Schouten Islands, Dutch New Guinea to begin flying electronic reconnaissance missions from the seaplane bases at Port Moresby and Samari Islands. By late 1944 as operations expanded in the Pacific, Heron's Black Cats were flying electronic missions out of the Philippines. He and his small group performed with the utmost distinction and courage throughout the remainder of the war in the Pacific, participating in most of the major battles and campaigns.
By autumn of 1944 the navy had been convinced of the merits of electronic warfare in general, and specifically of electronic reconnaissance. Consequently it was ready to begin, employing these air- borne capabilities on a much larger scale. Thirteen of the eighteen land-based VPB squadrons in the Pacific already had some of their aircraft modified to carry the APR-1 radar receiver and the APT-l, APT-5 or APQ-2 radar jamming equipment. In addition, a few Navy Liberators were equipped with the newer APR-5 receiver to search for Japanese radars in the higher frequency spectrum (microwave). Carrier-based aircraft, such as the TBF/TBM Avenger, also received an allocation of the new electronic warfare equipment.
An important addition to the Navy electronic warfare effort was made in the spring of 1945 with arrival in the Pacific of the new PBY.2 Privateer in VPB-106. The Privateer was derived from the PBY-1 Liberator and was specifically modified for Navy long-range maritime patrol operations with a crew of up to 16. In its conversion from the AAF B-24, the twin tail was changed to a single tail and a seven-foot extension was added to the fuselage for the countermeasures compartment. A large number of radomes were also added to cover the countermeasures antennas. Because of these radomes protruding from its skin the Privateer received the nickname "Wart Hog".
The countermeasures compartment included the following: for electronic reconnaissance there were APR-l, APR-2 and APR-5 radar intercept receivers with associated pulse analyzers and DF equipment. Additionally, APR-5 and APR-7 communications intercept equipment was available. If electronic countermeasures operations were required the PBY-2 included the APT-l, APQ-2 and APT-5 jammers. Furthermore, the Privateer's standardized equipment mounting racks allowed the electronic warfare suite the flexibility to be quickly tailored for each mission. With this new capability, VPB-106 immediately began flying barrier patrols in support of naval forces preparing for the assault on Iwo Jima. Operations continued throughout the closing months of WWII.

 (Photos: One of The earliest carrier-based electronic reconnaissance missions was flown 16 Feb 1945 by a TBM-3D of VT(N)-90 from Enterprise (CV-6j. LCDR Charlie Henderson, pilot, with LCDR Henry Loomis and LTJG Ted Halbach operating specially-installed gear, reconnoitered Japanese radar characteristics and positions in support of the first carrier raids on Tokyo 16-17 Feb.)
The Rush to Demobilize
In the post-war era of rapid demobilization, the Navy's fledgling airborne electronic reconnaissance capability suffered accordingly. By the end of 1945, RRL's manpower had decreased dramatically and the Navy pushed hard to complete development of the new APR-9 radar receiver set before the shop doors closed. The APR-9 was in fact completed, later manufactured in large numbers and would be at the heart of the Navy's airborne electronic reconnaissance for many years to follow.
On 31 December 1946 Special Projects Unit Cast was disestablished at NAS Squantum, Massachusetts. The unit's personnel, materials and functions were transferred to the Air Support Division of NRL. Even so, the capability would survive. Like most other fields of military endeavor during the post-war period, Navy airborne electronic reconnaissance undoubtedly survived mainly through the dedication of a few "true believers".
It appeared the small group of airborne electronic reconnaissance proponents had finally won an influential following. They now felt secure that the United States would never again be found without the technical skills and equipment necessary to fulfill the airborne electronic reconnaissance mission, unfortunately such was not the case. The severe economy programs between the end of WWII and the Korean War took their toll of the established airborne electronic reconnaissance programs, severely inhibiting the research and development required if the systems, technicians and aircraft were to keep pace with jet-age technology.
Only one year after V-J Day, the massive military demobilization had taken such a toll of technicians and spare parts that a large percentage of all U.S. Navy electronic equipment was inoperative. Since too few technicians remained in the service for electronics repair, and since the radio and radar equipment was fundamentally required for the mission of the aircraft, the second-priority electronic reconnaissance equipment fell into a general stage of disrepair.
The New Threat Arises
By 1949 U.S. military planners fully realized they had insufficient information about the location, capabilities and overall technical characteristics of Sino-Soviet Bloc radar systems. Also, the Soviet Union was now involved in the development and testing of high technology weapons such as surface-to-air missiles. Therefore, by the beginning of 1950 the collection of electronic intelligence on these systems became a high priority. Such an ambitious collection program, however, required reasonably sophisticated electronic equipment. Unfortunately for the United States most of the equipment built to conduct electronic reconnaissance during WWII had since been sold to junk and surplus dealers.
When it was decided to equip two patrol squadrons to conduct the electronic reconnaissance mission, the Navy found it had insufficient equipment on hand. The Navy sent two chief electronic technicians to locate and buy back some of the equipment which previously had been sold as surplus. Wearing civilian clothes and carrying large quantities of cash, the two chiefs rooted through war surplus stores in New York City. They purchased all the intercept receivers, direction finders, pulse analyzers and other electronic reconnaissance equipment they could locate. This equipment was then repaired by Navy technicians and installed in Privateers and P2V Neptunes for the high-priority electronic reconnaissance or Ferret (the Air Force term used unofficially by Navy crews) missions around the periphery of the communist nations, particularly Russia.
In order to accomplish the significant airborne electronic reconnaissance requirements of the late 1940s and early 1950s, it appears he U.S. Navy took two separate but coordinated directions.
One direction was oriented toward "mission support" of the aircraft in which the electronic reconnaissance equipment was installed. This evolution was primarily reflected in the VP squadrons where the equipment was usually operated by normal squadron personnel as "just another sensor" to assist the conduct of the squadron's missions of anti-submarine patrol, surface surveillance, bombing, mining and general area surveillance. This mission support airborne electronic recce effort was fairly significant considering the proliferation of the Privateer (redesignated P4Y in 1951) to patrol squadrons worldwide soon after WWII.
The P4Y-2 was followed shortly by introduction of the P2V series to patrol squadrons. The Lockheed Neptune entered operational service in 1947 and remained the mainstay of U.S. Navy land-based patrol aviation for nearly 20 years. The P2V-l of the late 1940s evolved into he P2V-7 final production model of 1954. Major design changes were introduced in the P2V-5 which first flew in 1950. A pair of Westinghouse J34 turbojets were added to -5s to boost the takeoff and speed-over-target capabilities of the standard 3,500 hp reciprocating engines. This model, with a ten-man crew, was designated the P2V-5F and was frequently employed in electronic reconnaissance.
Both Privateer and Neptune aircrews performed routine electronic -reconnaissance in support of their anti-submarine and surface surveillance missions worldwide. Additionally, their electronic recce operations often paid high dividends in the intercept of information which was of Navy and national interest, well beyond the mission sup- port function. Perhaps it was the Communists' appreciation of this fact that accounted for several of their attacks on "normal" VP aircraft during the 1950s.
The second direction taken by the Navy was oriented toward dedicated electronic reconnaissance, performed by highly specialized and trained personnel who conducted their missions in a few specially-configured aircraft. These special aircraft operated within normal Navy patrol or airborne early warning (VW) squadrons. This "branch" of U.S. Navy airborne electronic reconnaissance operations subsequently gave birth to VQ-1 and VQ-2. From the end of WWII until the early 1950s these "dedicated" electronic reconnaissance assets remained as a part, or detachments, of otherwise normal Navy squadrons. These squadrons, including the electronic reconnaissance detachments, primarily flew the P4Y-1, P4Y-2 or the newer P2V series. The Navy's dedicated airborne electronic reconnaissance units, after getting their rough-hewn start in 1944 with LT Heron's two PBY-5A Black Cats, struggled along in typical "orphan" style.
Although information on these small dedicated units is incomplete, it appears that one each was set up in the Pacific and Europe. By the late 1940s-early 1950s, the European and Pacific airborne electronic reconnaissance detachments had settled in at NAF Port Lyautey, Morocco and NS Sangley Point, Philippines, respectively. From the limited evidence available, it appears that while the detachments remained in place, the parent squadrons would rotate through the two sites on normal operational deployments. For example, VP-73, VP-63 and VP-26 operated at NAF Port Lyautey, Morocco during this post-war period. Similarly, several VP squadrons rotated through the Philippines during this same time. Thus the Navy's dedicated airborne electronic reconnaissance capability, although still an orphan, hitchhiking on other folk's aircraft with hand-me-down equipment, was at least beginning to take root at fixed sites in the two major theaters of operations.
 (Photo: Neptunes such as this P2-V5F of VP-22 flew special AER missions during the '50s and were favorite targets for ChiCom gunners and MiG pilots. From 1950 until 1969, the Navy lost 79 lives to Communist fire during attacks on its aircraft. The first loss was over the Baltic in Apr 1950. In the Pacific, VP-6 lost a P2V-3W to Soviet MiGs 6 Jun 1951 and VP-22 followed next, losing a P2 V-5 in the Formosa Strait to ChiCom AA.)
A Dangerous Occupation
Both the Navy's dedicated and mission support electronic recce air- craft soon became involved in surveillance missions of the Communist periphery and just as quickly found this to be a dangerous undertaking. In fact, to crewmembers of the Navy's Ferret aircraft, the "cold war" appeared to be a serious misnomer! During this era U.S. airborne electronic reconnaissance missions became involved .in a bloody series of clashes in which they were victims of Soviet, North Korean and Communist Chinese aggression while in international airspace.
This series of incidents lasted from 1950 unti11969, costing the Navy approximately a dozen electronic reconnaissance aircraft and the loss of at least 79 lives. But the Navy was not the only victim of Communist airborne aggression during the post-war period; the U.S. Air Force also was involved in more than a dozen incidents, wherein at least 46 of its airmen were killed between 1949 and 1964. This sequence of deadly incidents clearly indicates the dangers faced by Navy airborne electronic reconnaissance crews on their daily missions, while emphasizing the importance the Communists place on thwarting enemy aerial reconnaissance in any way possible.
During this tense and turbulent inter-war period of increased Communist military preparedness and attempted forceful territorial expansion, it was imperative to maintain U.S. reconnaissance coverage. Electronic reconnaissance was one of the most effective methods of maintaining coverage and most of the operations were done by fixed- wing aircraft of the U.S. Navy and U.S. Air Force. These Ferrets operated around the periphery of the Communist states while intercepting, analyzing and recording electromagnetic signals of interest. Such peripheral airborne reconnaissance missions were entirely legal as long as they remained over international waters. At the same time, they were always exceedingly dangerous because the record has shown that Communists do not always observe international law.
In this regard it has been suggested by some that there may have been a trend in international law toward the emergence of a right, especially of Communist states, to proclaim and enforce a contiguous zone for the prevention of "passive" electronic reconnaissance by foreign ships or aircraft during peacetime. An examination of the evidence, however, does not support such a theory. Instead, the seizure or destruction of foreign electronic reconnaissance ships or aircraft by Communist nations has consistently been justified as "legal" by the assertion that such units had penetrated their territorial seas or national airspace. The evidence further indicates that Communist governments do not appear to have ever officially asserted that electronic reconnaissance from international waters is a violation of international law. In summary of this point, international law does not forbid passive electronic reconnaissance from the high seas during peacetime and does not empower the coastal state to interfere. Such reconnaissance is nevertheless likely to be resented and resisted by the coastal state.
Although the Communist states exacted a toll of U.S. electronic reconnaissance flights during this turbulent period, the U.S. has never responded in kind. Despite the fact that Communist electronic reconnaissance aircraft have made hundreds of flights along the borders of Canada, Alaska and the Continental U.S., and have occasionally strayed from international areas, the U.S. has never attempted to shoot one down.
Korea, A New Need for Electronic Reconnaissance
The five short years of peace following WWII were characterized by an unsteady era usually termed the "cold war". During this period tensions between the United States and the Sino-Soviet Bloc increased steadily until June 1950 and the outbreak of hostilities in Korea. Shortly after U.S. forces entered that conflict it became readily apparent their need for airborne electronic reconnaissance would be even greater than during WWII.
Korea was the first in a series of new conflicts called "limited wars", wherein political and military considerations were equally important. In this new limited war each decision was evaluated in terms of diplomatic consequences and such considerations drove the need for intelligence to new highs. With the dramatic rise in electronics and particularly in communications, sensor and navigations systems, the requirements for military electronic reconnaissance rose correspondingly. The Navy satisfied its airborne electronic reconnaissance requirements in the same pattern developed during the closing months of WWII with both mission support and dedicated approaches.
The mission support assets remained primarily in the patrol community. In addition to the routine anti-submarine patrols, weather reconnaissance, coastal and open-ocean surveillance missions, Pacific VP squadrons during the Korean War conducted other "special functions", which apparently included electronic reconnaissance.
Probably while involved in one of these special missions on 6 November 1951 a VP-6 P2V Neptune was lost to hostile fire. The Neptune was operating in international waters in the Sea of Japan off Russia's eastern coast when it reported that it was being fired on by Soviet aircraft. The Neptune and its ten-man crew then disappeared off Vladivostok, 32 miles outside soviet claimed waters.
 (Photo: 1951 brought the Navy increased capabilities in the airborne aerial reconnaissance field with the establishment of The Special Projects Division of NS Sangley Point, P.I.'s, Air Operations Department. The unit had four P4M-1Q Mercators assigned. This unit became VW-1 Del Able 13 May 1953, which, in turn, became VQ-1 on I Jun 1955, the Navy's first dedicated AER squadron. The P4M-1Q was modified from the basic Mercator patrol plane airframe. They would serve VQ-1 until 23 Jul 1960, when the last one was retired.)
The Development of a Dedicated Pacific Unit
The XP4M-l Mercator was designed In 1944 and delivered to VP-21 in 1950 as the P4M-l by the Martin Company, Modified as the P4M-IQ (Q for countermeasure). it could carry a heavy payload of electronic reconnaissance equipment and a large crew of intercept operators over extremely long distances. The P4M-1Q had an operating range of 2,000 miles and a ceiling of over 17,000 feet.
About a year later, in June 1954, VW-1 returned to NAS Barbers Point, Hawaii while the electronic recce assets remained as Detachment Able and were reassigned to VW-3. At this time the det had a complement of 22 officers and 110 enlisted men.
The mission support half of the Navy airborne electronic recon- naissance team also continued to collect intelligence to supplement the four Det Able Mercators. On 4 September 1954 a VP-19 P2V-5 flying from NAS Atsugi, Japan flew a routine mission in the Sea of Japan. The mission was flown over international waters off the Russian coast.
There were two engines in each of its twin nacelles; a reciprocating engine in front and a turbojet to the rear and underneath. With this arrangement the Mercator could cruise at 150 kts to monitor target electronic signals but could bring the two jet engines on line if attacked by enemy aircraft, and accelerate up to 340 kts.
In October 1951 a dedicated Navy airborne electronic reconnaissance capability came into focus again for the Pacific Theater. The Special Products Division of the Air Operations Department was established at NS Sangley Point, Philippines. The division, under OinC LCDR J.T. Douglas, employed four of the latest P4M-1Qs and was assigned the primary mission of airborne electronic countermeasures for the U.S. Pacific Fleet. The in flight operators assigned to accomplish the "back end" of the aircraft functions were members of Naval Communications Unit 38C, who reported TAD to the Special Projects Division for flight operations. The Special Projects Division continued airborne electronic recce operations throughout 1952, with LCDR A.W. Sweeten assuming OinC duties in December. Some sources refer to this unit as the .'Special Electronic Search Project".
During the Korean War one of the primary Seventh Fleet tasks was to protect Formosa from attack by the Communist Chinese. At the same time the presence of Seventh Fleet was required hundreds of miles to the north in Korean waters to conduct missions in support of the United Nations forces engaged there. Thus, employment of dedicated and mission support electronic reconnaissance to keep watch over Fomosa, freed Seventh Fleet units to conduct the more pressing combat operations in Korean waters. These reconnaissance operations made it impossible for the Chinese Communists to mount a surprise attack on Formosa without a timely recall of the Seventh Fleet.
During such operations on 18 January 1953 a VP-22 P2V-5 was shot down by Red Chinese anti-aircraft fire off Swatow in the Formosa Strait. Rescue operations were hampered by fire from Communist shore batteries and high seas. A U.S. Coast Guard rescue PBM-5 crashed on takeoff in the rough seas after conducting rescue operations for the survivors. Total losses in this incident were eleven; seven from the P2V crew and four from the Coast Guard rescue aircraft.
The Neptune departed its base shortly before 1400 local time, con- ducting a normal mission until shortly after 1812. At that time the aircraft was at 8,000 ft, speed 180 kts, on a heading of 067. The aircraft was over international waters southeast of Cape Ostrovnoi, 33 nautical miles from Soviet territory. Suddenly and without warning two Soviet MiG-15 jet aircraft approached the lumbering Neptune from the rear and opened cannon fire. The P2V pilot immediately went into a sharp right turn away from the Soviet landmass and entered a steep dive of 2,000-3,000 feet per minute in an attempt to evade the attackers. The skilled Navy pilot finally reached a protective cloud bank after suffering at least three more firing passes from the Soviets. After the attacking jets turned back toward land the Neptune, with its port wing burning, was ditched into the sea.
(Photo: Below - In another of the long string of dangerous incidents involving US. Navy/Sino-Soviet aircraft, a VP-19 P2V-5 was attacked 4 Sep 1954 while patrolling over the Sea of Japan. The aircraft was successfully ditched with the loss of one crewmember)

(Photo: Below -P4M-1Q PR 9 collapsed a nose gear at NAS Atsugi, Japan in Jan 1958. This aircraft was attacked 16 Jun 1959 by North Korean MiGs off Wonsan. LCDR Don Mayer managed to bring the aircraft safely to Miho Air Base, Japan, with his wounded tail gunner.

(Photo: Below: a VQ-1 spook at Shemya, Alaska, in VP-9 markings in an attempt to hide among VP-9's deployed P2 Vs)

Nine of the ten crewmembers made their way from the doomed aircraft and into a survival raft. Tragically, ENS Roger H. Reid was trapped in the sinking P2V while attempting to put out an additional raft. The nine survivors remained afloat in the area where they had been shot down, while the government of the USSR made no attempt whatsoever to rescue them. As a result of an emergency radio message sent from the Neptune during the attack, U.S. rescue aircraft located the survivors shortly before dawn 5 September. They were immediately rescued and returned to Japan but the body of ENS Reid was never found.
The United States submitted the case, along with a damage claim of $1,355,650.52 against the Soviet government, to the International Court of Justice. The Soviet Union refused to submit the dispute to the court, thus closing out the case.
Another attack on a U.S. Navy electronic reconnaissance mission occurred 22 June 1955. A VP-9 P2V-5 was fired on by two Soviet MiG-15s while operating in the Bering Sea. The MiG cannon attacks set fire to the Neptune's starboard engine and forced it to crash-land on St. Lawrence Island. Seven of the ten crewmen were wounded.
A New Navy Squadron
Three weeks earlier, on 1 June, the Pacific's dedicated airborne electronic reconnaissance capability in VW-1 Detachment Able was reorganized into an independent command. The unit was redesignated Electronic Countermeasures Squadron One, with the alphanumeric designator VQ-1. This marked the first Navy squadron to bear the "overt" electronic countermeasures designation, and the electronic reconnaissance function was now out of the closet. LCDR E.R. Hall, who had been OinC of the detachment, then assumed command as the first commanding officer of VQ-1. At about this same time VQ-1 took receipt of two additional P4M-1Qs, bringing the total complement to six.
In September VQ-1 was directed to relocate to NAS Iwakuni, on the southern end of the Japanese island of Honshu. The move was completed by October and the squadron was soon back to business as usual.
In June 1956 CDR William H. Huff relieved Hall as VQ-1's CO. By that time the complement had grown to 28 officers and 220 enlisted men. Some early milestones set in 1956 were: 289 flight hours for the month of June, and the 1,000th P4M-1Q landing since the squadron's commissioning, flown 20 July by LCDR F.E. Struthers.
Also in July a catastrophic P4M-1Q accident was prevented by the flying skills of LT J. Edixion. While in flight one of the Mercator's reciprocating engines fell completely from the aircraft, sending the plane into a flat spin. Through a display of aeronautical skill and determination Edixion was able to recover from the spin at 3,000 ft with the aid of the auxiliary jet engines. He then limped the crippled P4M for 100 miles into Naha AFB at Okinawa. The only crewman injured during the freak incident was LT Edixion-who sprained his ankle as he stepped from the aircraft after making the successful landing.
On the darker side, the squadron suffered its first loss from hostile fire in the Taiwan Strait 22 August 1956. A P4M-1Q on a night mission and its entire crew of 16 men were lost 32 miles off the China coast after reporting an attack by hostile aircraft. Carrier and land based air, along with surface ships, subsequently conducted a search. They found aircraft wreckage, empty life rafts and the bodies of two crewmen. Those losing their lives in this shoot down were: LCDRs Milton Hutchinson and J.W. Ponsford; LTJGs F.A.
Flood and J.B. Dean; PO1/c W. Haskins, H. Lonnsbury and A. Mattin; PO2/c C.E. Messinger, D. Barber, W. Caron and W. Powell; PO3/c J. Curtis, w. Humbert, D. Sprinkle, L. Strykowski and L. Young.
A New Capability Arrives
CDR Harvey Larson assumed command of VQ-1 late in August and shortly afterwards, on 7 November, two Douglas A3D-1Qs were added to the squadron inventory. A Navy news release of 8 November set the tone for the arrival of the all-jet Skywarriors at Iwakuni. The report stated these A3D-1Qs were the first of their type in the Far East and their arrival marked the first time a deceleration chute had been used on the Iwakuni airstrip.
The new aircraft were flown in by LCDRs John H. McIlmoil and Lee T. McHugh; navigators were LTJGs Gary W. Grau and Karle F. Naggs; crew chiefs were ADC Robert J. Tallen and ADl Morris B. Nelson, and the radio-electronics were handled by ATl James G. Luse and AT2 Young W. Rown. The news release described a crowd of 500 station personnel cheering the arrival of the new aircraft and provided excerpts from addresses by the VQ-1 CO and NAS Iwakuni XO CDR C.B. Starkes. CDR Larson noted that he was mighty proud of our new addition and I might add that we are still very proud of our old P4Ms, they have been a reliable and faithful old gal." Since their delivery to the their delivery to the Navy the P4Ms had in fact performed faithfully and many of the pilots had a sentimental feeling toward the Mercator even though it would now be in the fast company of the sleek, modern Skywarrior:
 Photo: Carrier capability came to VQ-1 7 Nov 1956 with the delivery on the first Douglas A3D-1Q Skywarrior to the squadron at NAS Iwakuni, Japan) (Photo: VQ-1 CO CDR R.C. James landed A3D-1Q BuNo 30363 on port main and nose mounts with minimum damage after right main mount failure at Wakuni in January 1959. Electronic Whales" were also modified from basic Skywarrior airframes)
On 27 November 1957 CDR N.P. Byrd Jr. relieved Larson as commanding officer. The VQ-1 aircraft complement at this time was two A3D-1Qs and five P4M-1Qs. In May 1958 a Lockheed TV-2 Shooting Star was acquired as a two-place instrument trainer. During CDR Byrd's tenure as CO, other than the general heating up of the China-Taiwan conflict, the majority of squadron flight operations were logged as routine electronic reconnaissance missions, along with the usual intensive crew training evolutions.
The Year of Bad Luck
CDR R.C. James assumed command of VQ-1 30 November 1958, as the squadron entered a year-long period of misfortune. The series of tragedies began with the crash of an A3D-1Q (BuNo 130352) in the inland sea near Iwakuni 28 May 1959. The Skywarrior was piloted by LCDR Decker, with aircraft commander LTJG Al Dewitt in the right seat. The big jet was on a nighttime practice Tacan approach to Iwakuni when it apparently stalled at about 5,000 ft during the inbound turn. All three aircrew were killed.
Next, on 16 June, a VQ-1 P4M-1Q was on a routine recce mission over the Sea of Japan off the North Korean coast. While the Mercator was at 7,000 ft off Wonsan, North Korea, two MiGs attacked with cannon fire. A few moments later, the tail gunner, 20-year-old PO2/c Eugene Corder, collapsed with more than 40 shrapnel wounds. Now totally unarmed, the Merctlor continued to be attacked by the MiGs as LCDR Donald Mayer dove for the deck in an attempt to escape. By the time Mayer reached 50 ft altitude above the Sea of Japan, the P4M's two starboard engines and rudder had been shot away. On the way down the copilot, LCDR Vince Anania, could see the red stars painted on the fuselages of the North Korean fighters as they made six more passes at the crippled P4M.
The Mercator was barely able to limp back to Japan and make an emergency landing at Miho Air Base. LCDR Anania was a former All-American football player at the Naval Academy and his extraordinary strength was a significant factor in keeping the crippled plane airborne. Petty Officer Corder recovered from his wounds, receiving a Purple Heart. VQ-1 records show DFCs were presented to the pilot and copilot, while Air Medals went to the remainder of the crew.
The 16 June 1959 North Korean attack on the VQ-1 Mercator was the 33rd incident involving United States and Communist aircraft since the early 1950s. This bloody, one-sided air war would continue through the 1960s.
By late summer of 1959 VQ-1 had acquired a P2V-5F and a second TV-2. Then more bad luck plagued the squadron when in November the unit's first A3D-2Q was lost at sea near Wake Island during the trans-Pacific delivery. The pilot of the lost Skywarrior was CDR F.J. .'Frenchy" Surre, who had just reported aboard as operations officer. No trace was ever found of the four crewmen.
CDR W.R. Knopke assumed command of the squadron 20 October 1959 and shortly afterwards Lady Luck again frowned on VQ-1. This time, in December, a severe windstorm struck the squadron detachment at Shemya, Alaska. Heavy damage was caused to the VQ-1 hangar and strike damage was incurred by a P2V-5F. The squadron (lower right) had received two P2V-5Fs in August and September and later acquired a third in January 1960. The pilots of these aircraft were attached to VP-22 and the remainder of the crew were VQ-1 personnel. The P2V-5Fs were transferred from VQ-1 in March 1960.
A New Name and New Aircraft
The new year was begun on a brighter note in 1960 when the official name of the squadron was changed from Electronic Countermeasures Squadron One to Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron One. The Q designation remained unchanged. As new personnel began reporting aboard to man and maintain the new aircraft that were soon to arrive, they attended schools to obtain the skills that would soon be needed in upgrading the squadron. The squadron's first two A3D-2Qs delivered (BuNos 144855 and 146450) were flown to Iwakuni 22 January 1960, piloted by LT Jack Taylor, a future two-term CO of VQ-2 and LT Chuck Weitrich. The first Grumman F9F-8T Cougar arrived 12 February, and the first WV-2Q Super Constellation 21 February.
The two-place F9F-8T Cougar was used by VQ-1 only as a trainer, since it had no electronic reconnaissance capabilities. The squadron acquired a second of the swept-wing Grummans before the Cougars were transferred in 1962.
The original design of the Constellation was begun in 1939 to meet the requirements of Trans World Airlines. Modifications for the Navy's WV-2 version were begun in 1949, originally intended as a high-altitude radar early warning aircraft. In the late 1950s eight of these old WV-2s were pulled out of retirement from NAF Litchfield Park, Arizona and modified extensively by the Martin Company of Baltimore to perform the electronic reconnaissance mission. These eight aircraft were designated WV-2Q and fondly known as "Willie Victors" or simply "Willies". Four each of these, redesignated EC-121M in 1962, were assigned to VQ-1 and VQ-2 and remained electronic reconnaissance work-horses for many years.
The progenitor of the A3D-2Q had begun life in the post-WWIl era when naval strategists began to think in terms of carrier-based heavy attack bombers. By 1947 the basic specifications were set forth for the XA3D-l, which first flew in October 1952. After some modifications this new aircraft entered naval service in March 1956 with a nuclear strike capability. In September some of the Skywarrior prototype aircraft were modified to the A3D-1Q for electronic reconnaissance. These were as close to "new aircraft" as the VQ-1/2 community would ever receive. The fourplace1Qs served from 1956 until the arrival of the A3D-2Q in 1960. However, the A3D-1Q was never flown from aircraft carriers by the VQ squadrons.
The A3D-2Q provided a substantial boost in capability with an increase in crew size from four to seven and a corresponding increase in electronic equipment. This added capability was accomplished by sealing off and pressurizing the large bomb bay and converting it into space for four sensor operators. A total of 24 of these aircraft were modified for the two VQ squadrons. The A3D-2Q was redesignated EA-3B in October 1962. The .'Electric Whale", powered by two Pratt and Whitney J57 engines, has a maximum speed of 520 kts at 30,000 ft, a maximum altitude of 43,000 ft and maximum endurance of 5 hours 30 minutes. The normal takeoff weights are 78,000 Ibs ashore and 73,000 Ibs for carrier operations.

(Photos: Spook birds get all kinds of warts and bumps during their careers. LTJG Jack Taylor launches with LT Blackstock, LTJG Kirkpatrick and plane captain PO R.C Taylor from Shemya in A3D-1Q with "barber pole" antenna replacing tailguns. Lower left- WV-2Q "Willie Victors" or "Super Connies" came to VQ-1 in 1960. PR 22 was flown by LTJG "J.D." Meyer in 1964.)
Carrier proficiency qualifications began in late 1962 and the first detachment embarked in USS Kitty Hawk (CVA-63) in May 1964. Records available through September 1966 show VQ-1 dets operating from these other carriers off Vietnam: Bon Homme Richard (CVA-31), Constellation (CVA-64), Coral Sea (CVA-43), Enterprise (CVA(N)-65), Hancock (CVA-19) Independence (CVA-62), Midway (CVA-41), Oriskany (CVA-34), Ranger (CVA-61), Franklin D. Roosevelt (CVA-42)
A New Home and the Building Storm
While receiving the new aircraft, VQ-1 began the move to a new homeport at NAS Atsugi, Japan. The move was completed by July 1960 and the last P4M-1Q was retired in ceremonies held at NAS Atsugi, Japan on the 23rd. The squadron now had nine A3D-2Q, four WV-2Q and two F9F-8Ts, with 62 officers and 373 enlisted personnel.
During the last week of CDR Knopfe's command, an A3D-2Q was lost while conducting a routine training mission at NAS Atsugi, Japan. LT H.P. Sams spun in on the runway after wave off during an aircraft commander check ride. The cause of the accident was undetermined. Other fatalities in this crash were LCDR A.R. Hodge, AMI E. Taylor and AO3 O.J. Cladry.
CDR T.E. Moore assumed command of VQ-1 25 January 1961. During his tenure VQ-1 grew to a total complement of 75 officers, 383 enlisted and 10 civilian personnel. Then in 1961 ominous developments began to unfold with a civil war in Vietnam. The crisis there would continue to build with the assassination of President Diem in 1963, the coup in January 1964 and finally the Tonkin Gulf incident in August. This action would prove the beginning of a long-term U.S. involvement in Southeast Asia during the Vietnam War -one in which VQ-1 would play a major part in the Navy's role. In fact, VQ-1 began flying missions in Southeast Asia as early as the spring of 1962.
With the building storm in Southeast Asia VQ-1 continued electronic reconnaissance missions in support of both Navy and national intelligence collection requirements through the early 1960s. Commanders J.W. Jenkins, W.J. Wacker and A.T. Holt led VQ-1 through the period December 1961-November 1964.
While the conflict in Southeast Asia heated up, VQ-1 began preparations for establishment of EA-3B detachments on board Seventh Fleet aircraft carriers. According to aviation history summaries, aircrew car- and Ticonderoga (CVA-14). During one of these EA-3B dets the seven members of LCDR Cunningham's crew won the Navy Unit Commendation for their part in the U.S. response to North Vietnamese aggression during the Tonkin Gulf incident of August 1964. However, for most of the Vietnam War, the EA-3Bs were primarily land-based at FASU/NSA DaNang, Republic of Vietnam because of the lack of deck space on the war-loaded carriers and better facilities at the South Vietnamese base.
On 25 November 1964 CDR F. Carment Jr. assumed command of VQ-1 as the United States began to enter the Vietnamese War in earnest. During the next nine years VQ-1 would operate its land-based EC-121Ms and EP-3Bs from FASU/NSA DaNang, Republic of Vietnam; NAS Cubi Point, Philippines; Bangkok, Thailand; Tainan, Taiwan; and several other bases, while the EA-3Bs flew primarily from Seventh Fleet carriers and FASU/NSA DaNang, Republic of Vietnam. These missions were flown in support of USN and USAF air strikes, U.S. Army and Marine Corps land campaigns and national intelligence collection requirements.
Specific types of support provided by the VQ-1 aircrews were MiG and SAM warning services, electronic order of battle (EOB) updating and electronic intelligence collection in support of combat contingency planning. The VQ-1 SAM warning services were especially crucial to the survival of Navy carrier aircrews flying over North Vietnam because of the lack of deceptive ECM (DECM) systems on tactical aircraft at that time.
In recognition of these vital electronic reconnaissance missions, VQ-1 aircrews were presented innumerable awards of the Distinguished Flying Cross, Bronze Star, Air Medal, Navy Commendation Medal, various campaign medals and two Navy Unit Commendations (NUC). In the citation to the Navy Unit Commendation presented to VQ-1 for the period 1 December 1965 through 30 November 1967 the squadron was cited as "carrying out an extremely broad program of electronic warfare and special intelligence collection of national importance", The citation further stated that VQ-1 "provided invaluable direct tactical support to combat commanders prosecuting the war against communist subversion in Southeast Asia, VQ-1 has won unqualified praise from all branches of the United States Armed Services, and from national intelligence agencies, and is widely considered the unquestioned leader in the field of electronic warfare tactical support under combat conditions". Finally, the citation acknowledged that VQ-1 "has been directly instrumental in saving countless lives of U.S. air combat pilots and crewmen over North Vietnam.
Although no VQ-1 aircraft were shot down in the hostilities in Southeast Asia there were instances of damage to squadron aircraft on the ground during enemy rocket attacks at FASU/NSA DaNang, Republic of Vietnam. Outside the war zone however, in April 1969, a VQ-1 EC-121M and crew of 30 were lost to hostile fire from North Korean MiG fighters. On 14 April the Super Connie, with LCDR James Howard Overstreet as mission commander, took off from NAS Atsugi, Japan and headed northeast for a routine electronic reconnaissance mission off the North Korean coast. The flight plan called for the crew to proceed to a point off Musu Peninsula where they were to fly elliptical orbits, each about l20 miles long.
At 1350, a little less than seven hours after takeoff, a U.S. Air Force tracking station monitoring the flight detected two new blips as a pair of North Korean MiGs rapidly closed on the unarmed VQ-1 aircraft. Although a prearranged message was sent to Overstreet ordering him to abort his mission, as the lumbering EC-121M turned away it was shot down southeast of Chongjin, North Korea, with a loss of all thirty crewmen. Only two bodies were subsequently recovered, those of LTJG Joseph R. Ribar and AT1 Richard E. Sweeney. In addition to Overstreet, Ribar and Sweeney, those lost in the shoot down were: LTs John Dzema, Dennis B. Gleason, Peter P. Perrottet, John H. Singer and Robert F. Taylor; LTJGs Robert J. Sykora and Norman E. Wilkerson; CPOs Laverne A. Greiner, Marshall H. McNamara and Richard E. Smith; PO1s Steven C. Chartier, Bernie J. Colgin, Bailard F. Connors Jr., James L. Roach and John H. Potts; PO2s Louis F. Balderman, Dennis J. Horrigan, Richard H. Kincaid, Frederick A. Randall and Stephen J. Tesmer; PO3s Gene K. Graham, David M. Willis, Gary R. Ducharme, John A. Miller Jr. and Philip D, Sundby; AN Richard T. Prindle and SSGT Hugh M. Lynch. Immediately after the incident President Nixon ordered a halt to reconnaissance missions in the Sea of Japan. The frequency of these missions had been averaging more than 60 per month until this time. President Nixon ordered the electronic reconnaissance resumed three days later, however, but this time with the protection of Task Force 71.
 (Photo: VQ-1 EA-3B "Whale"launches from waist cat off Constellation (CVA-64) 16 Nov 1974 during CV~9 operations in the Indian Ocean. VQ-1 det accompanied Constellation and CVW-9 into the Persian Gulf that same month, the only carrier to enter those waters since 1948. VQ-1 provides detachments to each carrier deployed to WestPac to support battle group commanders. With no replacement in sight for their more than 30-year-old aircraft, the squadron's task is formidable).
LCDR " J .D." Meyer, who would later command both VQ-1 and VQ-2, was the senior member of the investigation board for this accident. Those perishing in this crash were: LCDRs Harvey C.K. Aiua and Harry C. Martin; LTs Robin A. Pearce and George L. Morningstar; LTJGs James M. Masters Jr., Charles E. Pressler and Jean P. Souzon; CPO William J. Risse; POls Larry 0. Marchbank, Arthur D. Simmons and Donald W. Wilson; P02s Floyd E. Andrus III, Gregary J. Asbeck, William P. Bletsch, Guy T. Denton, Joseph S. Saukaitis, John S. Schaefer, Stuart J. Scruggs and Barry M. Searby; P03s John M. Birch, Thurle E. Case, Ben A. Hughes and Ralph S. Purdum.
A brighter moment came when, in recognition of superior actions during the 1967-1970 period, the squadron was awarded its third NUC and a Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC).
Growth, Another Change of Homeport and the EP-3E
In June 1971 VQ-1 changed homeport from NAS Atsugi, Japan to NAS Agana, Guam. In addition the squadron was assigned the missions of weather reconnaissance and airborne photography when Airborne Early Warning Squadron One (VW-1) and Heavy Photographic Squadron 61 (VAP-61) were disestablished. For a brief time VQ-1 shouldered the mission of typhoon and general weather reconnaissance from the international dateline to the Malay Peninsula. The weather mission was discontinued at the end of the 1971 typhoon season but the squadron retained the photographic reconnaissance mission and continued worldwide photographic and cartographic mapping capabilities until the RA-3B was retired in July 1974.
CAPT Joe Akins relieved CAPT Chute as CO in July 1971 to continue the series of 0-6 skippers that would last until December 1982. The airborne electronic reconnaissance community was about to receive an improved aircraft capability in the form of the EP-3E Aries. Design of the P3V-l Orion began in 1957-58 to provide an ASW replacement for the widely-used P2V Neptune. The Lockheed Company won the contract and converted its commercial Electra turboprop airliner into the P3V. The name Orion was adopted in late 1960 and the P3V designation changed to P-3 in 1962. The P-3A began arriving in VP squadrons during the summer of 1962. Ten of these older P-3As were converted to EP-3E electronic recce configuration for VQ-1 and VQ-2 in the early 1970s as replacement for the EC-121Ms. The EP-3E carried a special radar, radomes in long fairings above and below the central fuselage and an additional ventral radome forward of the wings. The EP-3E is powered by four turboprop engines, has a maximum speed of 350 kts and a service ceiling of 28,500 ft. With its 28-man crew and a 142,000 Ib maximum takeoff weight, the all-weather Aries has a maximum endurance of 12 hours. VQ-1 received its initial EP-3E in September 1974 and after the delivery of the fourth Aries in the fall of 1976, the last squadron EC-121M was retired. The added capabilities of the EP-3E contributed significantly to the squadron winning another MUC award for the period 1 Apri11972-27 January 1973.
The squadron experienced another aircraft loss when an EA-3B crashed at sea in 1973. Fortunately, in this case there was no loss of life.
The New Capabilities Arrive
During the Vietnam War CDR Carment was followed as commanding officer of VQ-1 by CDR M.E. Klein (Nov 1965-Nov 1966), CDR R.F. Dreesen (Nov 1966-Dec 1967) and CAPT R.M. DeLorenzi (Dec 1967-Feb 1970).
In this era VQ-1 acquired additional aircraft capabilities. In November 1968 a TA-3B was acquired for training and logistics purposes. Shortly afterwards, on 17 March and 21 June 1969, two EP-3Bs converted from P-3A Maritime Patrol Orion airframes, were delivered to supplement the aging EC-121M. These two Batrack aircraft would serve as the "informal" electronic reconnaissance prototypes for ten P-3As that would subsequently be modified to the EP-3E Aries. And finally the first of the EA-3B avionics updates, named Seawing, was received in August 1969.
With the continuing increase in size of VQ-1 and the importance of the squadron's role in Southeast Asia, CAPT DeLorenzi was followed by another 0-6 as commanding officer, CAPT C.L. Chute. Shortly after CAPT Chute's assumption of command in February 1970, VQ-1 lost an EC-121M (BuNo 145927). On 16 March the Super Constellation crashed while landing at FASU/NSA DaNang, Republic of Vietnam, with the loss of 23 EA-3B with five crewmen was on an over water navigational training flight from Guam to the Philippines. At some point en route a combination of navigation equipment malfunctions and human error resulted in total disorientation. Unable to locate land, the crew was forced to bailout at the fuel exhaustion point. The entire crew was picked up by a helicopter from the Japanese destroyer Haruna.
At the end of U.S. combat operations in Vietnam in 1973 VQ-1 began a move back to providing open-ocean tactical electronic support to Seventh Fleet carrier battle groups. The first regular Indian Ocean cruise made by VQ-1 EA-3B Whales occurred in early 1974 with a two-aircraft detachment on board Kitty Hawk. By this time the leadership of VQ-1 had passed from CAPT Akins to CAPT T.W. Connolly. Soon after the Kitty Hawk deployment a single EA-3B detachment embarked in Midway for a three-year cruise throughout WestPac, deploying to the I0 once during that period. This action signaled the start of a regular VQ-1 EA-3B presence on board Seventh Fleet carriers.
CAPT W.V. "pooch" Patterson assumed command of VQ-1 16 August 1976. At that time the squadron had 16 aircraft .(EP-3E, EP-3B, EA-3B, TA-3B and a P-3A for flight training and logistics), with more than 700 personnel assigned.
Two Individuals make VQ History
In November 1978 CAPT D.N. Hagen assumed command, the first person to command both VQ-1 and VQ-2. Additionally, CAPT Hagen was the first Naval Flight Officer to command VQ-1; all preceding COs had been aviators.
In October 1979, CAPT "J.D." Meyer relieved CAPT Hagen. CAPT Meyer was the second and last person to date who had commanded both VQ-1 and VQ-2. Shortly after Meyer's assumption of command, the Iranian crisis of 1979 resulted in an increased U.S. presence in the Indian Ocean. Accordingly, the Navy was committed to maintaining at least one carrier battle group in the vicinity of the northern Arabian Sea. Both VQ-1 and VQ-2 shared this commitment with CV-embarked EA.3B and Diego Garcia EP-3E detachments to provide crucial electronic reconnaissance services to the area. VQ-1 was awarded a fourth MUC for these Indian Ocean contingency operations covering the period 23 January to 1 May 1980. Also, participating aircrews and ground support personnel from both VQ-1 and VQ-2 were awarded the Navy Expeditionary Medal.
The Death of a Commanding Officer
CDR John T. Mitchell assumed command of VQ-1 in March 1984. Ten months later, on 23 January 1985, he and eight other VQ-1 personnel were killed when the squadron VIP aircraft was lost at sea en route to Guam from NAS Atsugi, Japan. CDR Mitchell was piloting the VA-3B when it disappeared from a radar tracking screen approximately 125 nautical miles north of Guam.
The subsequent JAG investigation, completed in September, reported the Skywarrior took off from NAS Atsugi, Japan at about 1000 Guam time. Twenty minutes later the crew contacted the VQ-1 detachment at NAS Atsugi, Japan and reported an air turbine motor (ATM) was malfunctioning. The VA-3B continued on its course and stayed in radio contact with Navy officials, first on Iwo lima, and then on Guam. At 1230 Guam time the navigator reported the starboard ATM was shut down and the port one was heating up. Seventeen minutes later the aircrew requested permission to descend from 33,000 to 20,000 ft. Four minutes later, at 1251, radar contact was lost with the stricken aircraft.
A massive air and sea search and rescue effort failed to locate any trace of the VA-3B or its crew and passengers. Presumed dead were CAPT Jim Brightman relieved CAPT Meyer in August 1981. A year later, on 4 August 1982, the squadron suffered its first fatal aircraft accident in more than a decade and its first EA-3B loss while operating from an aircraft carrier. The Skywarrior, piloted by LT Frank N. Kercher, disappeared over the Indian Ocean near Diego Garcia, while operating from Ranger. The subsequent rescue and debrief of a single surviving crewmember. P02 Robert Lee Huff. indicated the EA-3B may have broken up in flight after control failure. The remaining crewmen were LTs Michael F. Brown and David A. Pies; POs William B. Snider, Brian S. Watson and Airman Terry D. Smith. They were presumed killed or lost at sea. A subsequent JAG investigation blamed the accident on a zero-gravity maneuver.
After CAPT Brightman held command from August 1981 until December 1982 the squadron reverted to an 0-5 skipper for the first time since 1967. CDR Ivan E. Hughes resumed this 0-5 series which holds true at this writing.
During CDR Hughes' tour, Arabian Sea contingency operations. the KAL 007 airliner shoot down and the large-scale FleetEx 83 exercise occupied center stage for the squadron. VQ-1 received another MUC for 1983 for superior airborne reconnaissance operations, and the CNO Safety Award for 1983 during Hughes. tour. CDR Mitchell; LCDR Robert E. Delateur; LTs Marshall M. Laird and Carlos A. Miller, LTJG Richard A. Thomson; Senior Chief John T. Clark; Chief David K. Nichols; POs Thomas J. Jorgensen and Thomas J. Degryse. Thus, CDR Mitchell became the first incumbent VQ-1 commanding officer to be killed in the line of duty.
An endorsement to the accident investigation by VADM James E. Service, Commander Naval Air Pacific, summed up by saying: "Although the exact cause of the mishap cannot be determined from available information, dual ATM failure with resultant flight control problems is the conclusion best supported by the circumstantial evidence." The ATMs provide power for the hydraulic pumps, which in turn power the flight control surfaces.
CDR R.E. .'Bob" Claytor, the executive officer at the time of CDR Mitchell's tragic death, became the new CO and led the squadron through the next 16 months until relieved in May 1986 by CDR Earl Smith. At this writing, CDR Smith is scheduled to relinquish command to CDR Marcus Williams in August 1987.
Thus began the U.S. Navy's airborne electronic reconnaissance efforts in the Pacific, which resulted in the establishment of VQ1, the Navy's first dedicated squadron for the mission. Part two will examine the European Theater missions and VQ-2.
 USN
The Beginnings
Records of the early days of the Navy's aerial electronic reconnaissance efforts in the European area are vague. Through research of unit histories, personal interviews, and with some speculation, the following information has been discerned.
In much the same way as in the Pacific, the Navy's dedicated airborne aerial reconnaissance program in Europe had its genesis with patrol squadrons in World ,War Two. It appears that one of these European-based squadrons had a secondary task of electronic recce. At the end of the war, VP-114 had a three-plane detachment of Consolidated PBY-I Liberators based at NAF Port Lyautey, Morocco. Following the war, until June 1950, the squadron (variously designated VP-HL-6 and finally VP-26, which it carries today) maintained a permanent detachment of PBY-2 Privateers at Port Lyautey, while the parent squadron switched between the NAF Port Lyautey, Morocco and NAS Patuxent River, Maryland.
During this period, the Port Lyautey detachment aircraft were specially configured for the electronic reconnaissance mission, and thus present the earliest traceable origins of VQ-2.
The primary operating areas for the electronic reconnaissance versions of VP-26's "4Y-2"s were the Baltic and Adriatic Seas, with tasking against Soviet radar facilities. The squadron's "electronic" Privateers operated from Port Lyautcy under the guise of acting as courier aircraft for US. embassies and missions throughout Europe, Scandinavia and Western Asia. During one of these Baltic Sea missions occurred the first in a long series of incidents of the "Cold War" involving U.S. reconnaissance aircraft and Sino-Soviet fighters.
On 8 April 1950, a VP-26 PBY-2 (BuNo 59645) and its ten-man crew were lost in the Western Baltic Sea, apparently after being attacked by Soviet aircraft approximately 80 nm southeast of Gotland Island. Earlier in April the Privateer had deployed from Port Lyautey to the U.S. Air Force Base at Wiesbaden, Germany. Leaving one crewman on the ground, Aviation Electronic Technician- Stephen Zakian, the patrol bomber took off at 1031 Saturday, 8 April on a classified mission.

At 1330 the aircraft reported it was flying over Bremerhaven, Germany, and at 1440 made its last radio report. At 2330 VP-26 headquarters at Port Lyautey received a dispatch from the commanding officer of the U.S. Naval Base in Bremerhaven Stating PBY-2 bureau number 59645 was declared overdue by USAF Flight Service in Frankfurt. According to a later Soviet report, the Navy aircraft was sighted at 1739 on 8 April over Leyaya, Soviet Latvia, and mistakenly identified as a B-29 bomber. It was then intercepted and ordered to land, whereupon it reportedly exchanged fire with the Russian fighters and headed out to sea. The credibility of the Soviet report was seriously weakened by the fact that the Privateer’s· only armament was a .45 cal. pistol carried by one of the officer crewmen.
According to subsequently declassified VP-26 reports, by 0400 on 9 April three PBY-2s were ordered from Port Lyautey to Wiesbaden to conduct a search for BuNo 59645. VP-26 Privateers piloted by LT Rice, LTJG Linker and a third by LT Cobb, with the squadron executive officer on board, were launched in quick order. After a short stay in Wiesbaden, the aircraft moved on to Copenhagen, Denmark, and initiated search operations by the 10th. Before the search concluded, a fourth VP-26 Privateer and approximately 25 USAF aircraft would scour the Baltic for ten days.
(Photo - PB4 Y-2 BuNo 59645, seen here at Gibraltar 9 Nov /949, was shot down 8 Apr 1950 over the Baltic by Soviet fighters to became the first victim of the "Cold War." The fate of its ten-man crew was never confirmed, but it is suspected they were imprisoned in Russia ).
A life raft, identified as VP-26 property, was picked up by a Swedish fishing vessel a few days 5fter the search was suspended. Similarly, the British freighter Beechland pulled an empty aircraft life raft from the Baltic Sea 45 miles southeast of Stockholm. The raft was positively identified by the serial and contract numbers as having been issued to a PBY-2. After the incident a stiff note of protest and a rebuttal of the Soviet report was sent to the Russian government by the U.S. State Department.
Numerous Soviet naval and air contacts were reported by U.S. search aircraft, and in the VP-26 squadron report, at least two PBY-2 APS-15 radar operators reported noise- modulated radar jamming. The jamming obliterated the APS-15 scopes in up to 30-degree sectors for as long as three hours. The reports varied as to the origin of the jamming, but it was believed to have originated from a Soviet submarine or from ashore in Latvia..
No trace of the ten-man crew was ever found and eventually they were presumed dead. The crewmembers were: LTs John H. Fette and Howard W. Skeschaf; LTJG Robert D. Reynolds; ENS Tommy L. Burgess; AD1s Joe H. Danens Jr. and Jack W. Thomas; AT1 Frank L. Beckman; CT3 Edward J. Purcell; AL3 Joseph J. Bourassa; and AT3 Joseph N. Rinnier Jr.
 (Photo - VP-26 officers in front of old French BOQ at Port Lyawey ca. 1950. Back Row, from left: Ken Lampkin, Harry Farmer, Ed Tomko, Avn Midn Ken Owen, Gene Rice, Swede Erickson, Dick Kirkland, Ned Hayes, Boyce Webb, Walt Marusa, Bill Cobb, *Bob Reynolds, Dave Prior, Avn Midn Jim West and *Jack Felle. Front: Mead Massa, Ken Horn, Dennis Henderson, Fred Daley, Ed Siergiej, CDR Whilener, CDR Johnston, LCDR Murphey, Avn Midn Chuck Clarke, Lew Julian, Chandler Smith, *Howie Seeschaff, Bob Stafford, Don Heberling, Doc Linker. (*Shot down over the Baltic in BuNo 59645)
 (Photo - NAS Parr Lyautey, French Morocco, was base of VP-26's clandestine operations from 1945-50.)
 (Photo - VP-26 Det 214 crew, ca. early 1948. Back row, from left: LTJG Harwood, LTJG Hoerr, Avn Midn Hubbard, ENS Garrison, LTJC Ambler; LTJC Schwager, LCDR Reed, LTJC Finnegan, LCDR Pollard, LTs James and McKinney. CPOs McKinnis, Amato, Barber, Kroto, Marshal and unidentified. Fron tEMs Kraus, (?), Zimmerman, Suttlies, Linn, (?), Ryan, (?), (?), (.?), Meehan, (?), Cook, Cassese, Geeding, Carlon, Michels, Hall, Almori and unidentified.)
 Three of VP-26's special mission Privateers over the Med 1950..
In January 1955, two Americans were repatriated from Russian prison camps where they had been held since the end of WWII. They reported hearing of American prisoners who had been shot down over the Baltic Sea. Actual sighting of the Americans was reported by a third repatriate, a Yugoslav, who had served time in the infamous Soviet prison coal mine of Vorkuta, above the Arctic Circle. He alleged that one of his fellow prisoners had been a U.S. Navy officer from the lost Privateer. However, this claim was never confirmed.
A series of investigations by Naval Intelligence and demands to the Soviets by the State Department were to no avail. The fate of the VP-26 crew was never determined positively.
The First Unit Forms
Although definitive evidence is sparse, it appears that concurrent with VP-26's departure from Port Lyautey in the summer of 1950, a new unit was formed there utilizing three VP-26 det PBY-2s and some operating personnel from the squadron. This organization, designated NAF Patrol Unit, was manned by approximately 70 personnel and was dedicated to the mission of airborne aerial reconnaissance for the European theater.
By 1951 the new unit had replaced its Privateers with four Martin P4M-1Q Mercators, and later added a stripped Lockheed P2V-2 Neptune for pilot training. As covered in part one of this history, the P4M-1Q was a specially configured modified version of the basic P4M-l patrol bomber with two reciprocating and two auxiliary jet engines.
Heading the new unit as OinC was a CDR Larson, with LCDR Peeler as his assistant. An interview with a former P4M-1Q tail gunner, Freeman Dias of Bristol, R.I., indicated CDR Robert R. Sparks, who later served as a commanding officer of VQ-2, relieved CDR Larson as OinC about mid-1953.
Mr. Dias recalled the P4M-IQ had some protection against the ever present threat of communist shootdown in the form of 20mm nose and tail guns along with a .50 cal. upper fuselage turret. Even with this protection there were, nevertheless, instances of hostile action against the reconnaissance aircraft. For instance, sketchy information shows a P4M-1Q shot up badly during a mission in late 1951 or early 1952. A LT Huddleston was the Mercator pilot during the attempted shootdown incident, where at least one crewman was killed. Upon VP-26's 1950 departure from NAF Port Lyautey, Morocco Patrol Unit was formed to assume the European airborne electronic reconnaissance mission. Initially acquiring VP-26's special PBY-2s, they were soon traded for these three P4M-1Q Mercators, modified from the standard Marlin patrol bomber. By May 1953 the unit was redesignated VW-2 Det Able, as the evolution toward establishment of VQ-2 continued.
Growing out of the resources of VW-2 Det A, VQ-2 was established I Sep 1955 at NAF Port Lyautey, Morocco and acquired its "JQ" tailcode. Originally called Electronic Countermeasures Squadron Two, The name was changed 1 Jan 1960 to Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron Two.
 By May 1953 NAF Patrol Unit was redesignated Detachment Able of Airborne Early Warning Squadron Two (VW-2). VW-2 Det Able operated much the same as VP-26's det, a permanent unit at NAF Port Lyautey, Morocco under a squadron homeported at NAS Patuxent River, Maryland. In the Pacific, a twin unit, VW-1 Det Able, conducted reconnaissance from NS Sangley Point, Philippines.
Growing out of VW-2 Det Able resources, the airborne electronic reconnaissance assets of that unit were established as Electronic Countermeasures Squadron Two (ECMRon 2) on 1 Sep 1955. ECMRon2, assigned the alpha-numeric designation VQ-2, was homeported at NAF Port Lyautey, Morocco, with a total complement of 24 officers and 78 enlisted men and CDR Kalin as the first CO.
The squadron initially used the P4M-1Q, and later, the P2V Neptune as mission aircraft. Two models of the Neptune appear in available records, the P2V-3 and the P2V-5F. The single "dash three" was used only for pilot training and logistics. The P2V-5Fs would serve the squadron faithfully in the electronic recce role until the spring of 1960 when they began a phase-out period.
The Arrival of New Assets
The newer and faster carrier-capable A3D-1Q Skywarrior began arriving at VQ-2 in September 1956. During July two VQ-2 pilots had begun familiarization training at NAS Patuxent River, Maryland and in September ferried the first two Skywarriors to NAF Port Lyautey, Morocco. Later, on 6 December, the A3D-1Q flew its first operational mission with Skipper Kalin as the pilot.
Several major aircraft accidents occurred during VQ-2 operations while based at NAF Port Lyautey, Morocco, two of which resulted in loss of life. On 6 January 1958 a P4M-1Q crashed at Ocean View, Va. Four crewmen were killed, two received major injuries and the aircraft was destroyed. Then, on 16 October, an A3D-1Q crashed in the landing pattern at night while operating out of Incirilik AFB near Adana, Turkey. All four crewmen perished in the mishap.
Indicating the limited number of qualified personnel available for the VQ mission, CDR Sparks returned to the squadron as CO. He served from I July 1957 until 6 October 1958, by which time the squadron had grown to 48 officers and 281 enlisted.
Near the end of Sparks' tenure an interesting article appeared in El Rotando, the NS Rota, Spain, newspaper on 26 September 1958: "One of the U.S. Navy's hottest attack bombers, a twin-jet Douglas A3D Skywarrior, roared down the runway of the Spanish-American naval complex here yesterday morning and was logged as the first jet aircraft to make an operational landing at the growing base. The powerful, near supersonic bomber was piloted here from her home base at NAF Port Lyautey, Morocco by CDR Robert R. Sparks. The copilot was CDR Clarendon Sigley." Although not stated in the article, the visit to Rota by the VQ-2 CO and XO was probably in conjunction with the upcoming relocation of the squadron from Morocco to NS Rota, Spain.
CDR Sparks was relieved by CDR Sigley in October 1958. After his selection to captain in later years, Robert Sparks was killed in a helicopter accident in Iceland.
The Move to NS Rota, Spain and More New Aircraft
CDR Sigley was at VQ-2's helm during its move to Rota from late 1958 through the first few days of 1959. The move was officially completed 14 January. During the squadron's relocation, five A3D-2Qs were received to replace the less-capable A3D-1Qs. It was not until 14 January 1960, with CDR P.D. Halpin as skipper, that VQ-2 was officially transferred to the joint U.S.-Spanish base. Earlier, on 1 January, the official name of the squadron was changed to Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron Two (VQ-2). Just two days after the move, on 16 January, a VQ-2 Mercator crashed during daylight hours while operating out of Incirilik AFB. The aircraft was destroyed and all 16 crewmen killed.
But operations must go on, and on 26 February the squadron received the first two Lockheed WV-2Q Super Constellations, or, more popularly, "Willie Victors". On 31 March 1960 VQ-2 had an inventory of five A3D-2Q, two WV-2Q, three P2V-5F and two P4M-1Qs. The P2V-5F and P4M-1Q were soon to be phased out. Meanwhile, the newer WV-2Q and A3D-2Q continued to arrive at the squadron. In October 1962 the WV-2Q would be designated EC-121M and the A3D-2Q became the EA-3B. Regardless of what designation they bore, these Willie Victors, or "Connies", and Skywarriors, or "Whales", would serve the VQ community for many years to come.
VQ-2, now under the command of CDR Arthur G. Elder, soon settled down at its new location and quickly adapted to its replacement aircraft. Meanwhile, the squadron continued its business of airborne electronic reconnaissance in support of the Sixth Fleet and national intelligence collection programs.
While under the command of CDR H.E. Fitzwater, on 22 May 1962 tragedy again struck the squadron when a WV-2Q, operating from Furstenfeldbruk, West Germany, was lost in a mishap with its 26-man crew. For unexplained reasons, the tail section of the Connie separated in flight, resulting in an uncontrollable crash.
As a petty officer second class, the author, then stationed with the Naval Security Group Activity Bremerhaven, was detailed to the crash scene to assist in recovery of classified material. In a bizarre incident one of the crewmen happened to be in the aircraft's head, which was all the way aft, when the empennage broke off at the main cargo door point. The intact tail section, with its single passenger, was reported by several witnesses to have "flown" in a wide arc after the breakup and made a semi-controlled "landing" in a large freshly-plowed farm field. The crewman, apparently unhurt up to this point, was thrown from the tail section directly into a tree, where he was killed instantly from a broken neck.
 In military aviation, speed often means life. The arrival of A3D-1Q (EA-3A) Skywarriors in Sep 1956 to VQ-2 greatly enhanced the survivability of squadron aircrew. Slow-moving VQ-1 and -2 Mercator "sitting ducks" had several encounters with communist fighters on both sides of the Soviet Union resulting in losses of aircraft and crew.
The Series of Peacetime Crises Begins
In October 1962, VQ-2 deployed a detachment of aircraft and men to operate from NAS Key West, Florida in response to the Cuban Missile Crisis. The electronic intelligence collected by VQ-2 was used to integrate the photography acquired by RF-8s, U-2s and RF-101s into a coherent set of intelligence information to assist in resolving this major superpower confrontation.
An accepted fact of an international crisis is the political and military decision-makers' need for a greater quantity of near real-time intelligence. This important factor lay at the heart of VQ operations in its early days, and continues to do so today. Following the Cuban missile confrontation in 1962 was the Cyprus Crisis of 1964. At the time, CDR R.M. Davis was in command of VQ-2. Afterwards, a series of eastern Mediterranean crises provided ample opportunities for the squadron to collect and provide timely intelligence information to top-level decision-makers.
During the decade of the sixties, VQ-2 operations took on a more direct tactical fleet support role. This role was primarily in response to a rapidly growing and modernizing Soviet Navy which had established a continuous presence in the Mediterranean Sea, concurrent with the Cyprus Crisis. In the years to come, VQ-2 would experience a steady increase in the number of its electronic reconnaissance missions tasked against the Soviet Navy in the Mediterranean and other oceanic areas.
 WV:2Q (EC-121M) "Willie Victors" came to VQ-2 in the late '50s, just prior to the squadron's move to NS Rota, Spain, completed in January 1959.
 P2 V:5, similar to this one, and -5F Neptunes were utilized in the electronic recce role until 1960.
 A3D-2Q with its advance base support vans at Rota in 1960. WV:2Q is in background.
 CO CDR Art Elder brings A3D-2Q aboard Independence (C VA-62) for touch-and-go 25 Jan 1961 to become the first VQ pilot to take a VQ airplane aboard a carrier.

Diminutive A-4C Skyhawk of VA-64 refuels Whale over the Med during VQ-2 operations supporting America (CVA-66) in Jan 1966. First VQ-2 permanent carrier det deployed in Saratoga (CVA-60) in Jan 1965. For the most part, VQ-2 operated incognito during late '50s to late '60s.
Partly because of the growth of the Soviet Navy as a new factor in the Southern European theater, the first VQ-2 EA-3B detachment went aboard a Mediterranean-based carrier in January 1965, under Skipper CDR C.A. Kiser. Since this initial Whale det embarked in Saratoga (CVA-60), VQ-2 has provided almost continuous electronic reconnaissance support to Sixth Fleet carriers. The first loss of a VQ-2 Skywarrior during carrier operations came 3 November 1966 while the squadron was under the command of CDR J.H. McConnell. The EA-3B, piloted by LCDR "Monty" Lillebow, impacted the water aft of Independence (CVA-62) and was lost with its crew of six.
The Vietnam War
It was not only in routine recce operations and in peacetime crisis situations that VQ-2 saw action. There was also a war to be fought. The conflict had heated up in Southeast Asia, and by the autumn of 1965 the U.S. Navy required a degree of electronic recce capacity beyond that available in VQ-1. Consequently, beginning under the tenures of CDRs A.D. Burkett and E.Y. Laney, detachments of VQ-2 EA-3Bs and EC-121Ms were provided to the Pacific theater to conduct electronic reconnaissance in support of Navy combat operations in Vietnam. VQ-2 aircraft initially operated from NAS Cubi Point, Philippines, the Gulf of Tonkin carriers, and FASU/NSA DaNang, Republic of Vietnam. After detachment facilities were established at FASU/NSA DaNang, Republic of Vietnam, VQ-2 EA-3Bs operated almost exclusively from that site with VQ-1 aircraft. VQ-2 provided surface-to-air missile (SAM) and MiG threat warning services, which significantly contributed to the survivability of Navy strike aircraft. These VQ-2 assets also provided signals intelligence (Sigint) collection for electronic order of battle (EOB) updating and combat contingency planning.
VQ-2 lost one aircraft and a portion of a crew in two separate incidents in Southeast Asia operations between 1965 and 1968. During 1966 an EA-3B in transit from NAS Cubi Point, Philippines to FASU/NSA DaNang, Republic of Vietnam stalled in probable icing conditions at 45,000 ft and entered a violent spin. Although the pilot, LCDR Dave Caswell, recovered the A-3 at low altitude and landed safely, the four aft crewmen had already bailed out and were presumed drowned in the heavy seas.
In the summer of 1968 an enemy rocket attack against the base at FASU/NSA DaNang, Republic of Vietnam resulted in the partial destruction of a VQ-2 EA-3B (BuNo 144848) in its revetment. Although a VQ-1 EC-121M and EA-3B were also damaged in this attack, there were no personnel injuries. The VQ-2 Whale, although heavily damaged in the nose/cockpit section, was subsequently placed aboard an MSTS carrier to be transported to ConUS for repairs. On 14 December 1968, the EA-3B broke loose from its deck tied owns during rough weather in Tokyo Bay and was lost overboard. This incident signaled the beginning of the end of VQ-2 operations in Southeast Asia, as things were again heating up in the Med.
During the remainder of the Vietnam War VQ-2 had continued airborne electronic reconnaissance operations at a high pace in the crisis prone Mediterranean. While operating from Ramstein AFB, Germany, in the spring of 1968, another EA-3B bailout occurred. The aircraft, piloted by LCDR "Stu" Corey, was entering the Ramstein landing pattern near the town of Landstuhl on 16 March, when an inboard slat malfunction occurred at approximately 1,200 ft. With the EA-3B apparently entering a stall in a nose-up port turn, the pilot signalled for crew bailout. (EA-3B crews do not have the luxury of ejection seats!) The "back end" crew, consisting of LTJG "Dick" McBurnett, CPOs "Obie" O'Brien and Bob Johnson, and PO1 Dave Barlag, quickly "hit the silk" as they had practiced numerous times in squadron ditch and bailout drills. Because of the low altitude, the crew had only one or two swings in their chutes before landing in a heavily wooded area. Only Barlag landed on firm ground, while the other three chutes were caught in tall fir trees. Chief O'Brien was removed from his tree by the local fire department, while Johnson managed to free himself, suffering minor injuries.
Regrettably, LTJG McBurnett was less fortunate. In trying to disentangle himself from the tree, his chute broke free, resulting in a fall of 50-70 ft and severe back injuries. After two hours, McBurnett was finally located and rescued by a USAF helicopter. Ironically, his father also was injured a few kilometers from this accident site. He was hit by artillery fragments during the Battle of the Bulge in WWII.
 "Q" birds often sport all sorts of weird appendages such as the fuselage antennae on this A3D-1Q in 1959.
 After experiencing hydraulic problems following a night cat shot off Independence in Sep 1966, LCDRs Jack Taylor and Joel Graham and crew diverted to Sigonella, Sicily, encountering severe thunderstorms en route. Following repairs to some radome damage they launched for Rota. During climbout, the entire radome disintegrated; however, they were able to recover safely at NAS Sigonella, Sicily.
Meanwhile, after the crew bailout, LCDR Corey recovered the EA-3B when the slat became operative, and successfully landed at Ramstein. Corey's skillful recovery of the aircraft came only seconds before the final crewmembers, CPO Sweitzer and LTJG "Shep" Smith, were to bailout. The author, who was standing the Squadron Duty Officer watch in Rota at the time, can recall the initial telephone conversation with LTJG Smith after he arrived at Ramstein operations. As Smith was reporting the grim details of the bailout, the sound of heavy fight boots at a dead run over the tile floors could be heard in the background. Fortunately, these sounds were made by Dave Barlag as he arrived, parachute and all, after hitchhiking a ride to base operations with a German civilian in a Volkswagen "Bug". He brought the good news of sighting the other three chutes on his way down.
Left to Right - CDR H.E. Firzwarer (Ieft) receives Command at Sea device from CDR Art Elder during VQ-2 change of command at Rota in Apr 1962. (From left) CDR VE. Savage, AOCA P.S. Risley, LTJG J.A. Gandio, LCDR J.V. Pruitt, LTJG R.J. Sanse and CO CDR A.G. Elder, honor Jim Pruitt's, 1,000 A3D hours. LT Don East receives Navy Achievement Medal from CO CDR Glen Hatch in 1970.
 VAH-1 hosted VQ-2 det in CVA-62 during Jan 1961 CQ. (From left) LTs H.P. Hosey; W Cretsinger; CDR C.B. Smith, VAH-1 XO; CDR A.G. Elder; LT Jack Rinn and AM1 Phillips.
 VQ-2 "Khyber Pass Det" at Peshawar, Northern Pakistan, in 1961. In keeping with their line of work, they naturally posed in front of a "photography prohibited" sign.
The Loss of a Skipper
Several other accidents occurred during the 1960s resulting in the loss of 56 additional lives. In a 4 June 1968 EA-3B accident, the new squadron CO, CDR T.E. Daum, was killed with his electronic warfare department head, LCDR Bruce Ford; the special security officer, LCDR Jim Frazee; and the squadron navigation officer, LCDR Charlie Best. Two petty officer crewmen, Jim Henderson and Jack Snowdy, miraculously survived, but were hospitalized for several months. CDR Ted Daum had been CO of VQ-2 only 33 days at the time of his death.
Apparently the Skywarrior lost an engine just after takeoff and slowly lost altitude until it struck the ground in a sugar beet field approximately one mile east of the Rota airbase. The tail probably touched down first on the downslope of a small hill, which pitched the nose downward to begin a violent tumble. As the aircraft disintegrated, Petty Officers Henderson and Snowdy were thrown clear. LTs "Gus" Littlefield andTom Fritz were on their way to work at the squadron when they saw the aircraft go down. After parking their cars and making their way across the field on foot to the accident site, they initially found no signs of life. Shortly thereafter, a weak voice from a clump of grass asked, "Hey Gus, you got a cigarette?" It was then that Littlefield and Fritz found Henderson, and a few moments later, Snowdy, alive but very badly injured.
CDRs RW. Arn and H.G. Hatch led VQ-2 through the remainder of the busy 1960s when Soviet naval activity and Arab-Israeli tensions in the Mediterranean, as well as the Vietnam War, tugged at the squadron's limited assets.
A Period of Continued Crisis
The decade of the 1970s was frequently punctuated by international crises in VQ-2's theater of operations, especially in the Mediterranean. Notable among these were the 1970 Jordanian Crisis, the 1973 Yom Kippur War, the 1974 crisis in Cyprus and the continuing unrest in Lebanon. These and other situations invariably resulted in the presence of the Sixth Fleet offshore, which in turn required the services of VQ-2 in providing urgently needed tactical intelligence. Under skipper CDR Al Gallotta, VQ-2 received its second Meritorious Unit Commendation for superior electronic reconnaissance operations during the Jordanian Crisis 9 September to 31 October 1970. In part the citation stated: "These units (including VQ-2) contributed significantly to the effectiveness, mobility and success of fleet operations which were vital toward maintaining peace in the Mediterranean."
With the presence of the Sixth Fleet at these crisis situations, came the ever-increasing presence of the Soviet Navy in ADM Gorshkov's new peacetime instrument of foreign policy role. VQ-2 had to split its collection assets to monitor the actions ashore and those of the nearby Soviet naval units in an eyeball-to-eyeball stance with our own Sixth Fleet ships.
Some days things just don't go your way. Waterspouts in front of carrier forced this A3D-2Q flown by LCDR Mall Moore, Navigator LT "Shep" Smith, EVAL LT Don East and four enlisted operators, to divert to Sigonella only to confront Moore with a 50-kt crosswind landing with near-predictable results. Only minor crew injuries resulted, but the same aircraft got a "cold cat shot" off Roosevelt (CVA-42) 26 Feb 1970 with the loss of entire crew.
On their way to the "bird farm" in 1968 are (from left) AT1 Dave Barlag (later bailed out of EA-3B in Germany); LTJG Tom Wallis (killed in an EA-3B accident); AD2 Speck; LT Don East; CDR Glen Hatch, XO; and two unidentified crewmen.
 VQ-2 crews in Norway during 1968 (from left) LTs Dick Moser, Larry McGlothlin, Norwegian host officer, LT Tom Fritz (later VQ-2 CO) and LT Kelly. right-EP-3E Aries reported for duty 31 Jul 1971.
Arrival of the EP-3E
The 1970s also brought a vastly improved electronic reconnaissance platform to the VQ squadrons. The aging EC-121M was no longer able to meet the demands of high-tempo fleet reconnaissance missions in the dynamic environment of superpower competition. Consequently, on 31 July 1971 while under CDR J.E. Taylor, VQ-2 received its first Lockheed EP-3E Aries. By 1976 the sixth and final EP-3E had arrived in the squadron, for a total complement of six EA-3Bs, six EP-3Es, a TA-3B which had been acquired in May 1972, and a UP-3A acquired shortly afterwards. The TA-3B and UP-3A were valuable for pilot training and logistics purposes.
Although the very high fatality count of the 1960s was not repeated, mishaps nevertheless continued with the deaths of 12 VQ-2 flyers. On 26 February 1970 an EA-3B was lost while operating from Roosevelt (CVA-42) in the Mediterranean. The catapult system malfunctioned in mid-stroke, resulting in the Skywarrior "dribbling" off the bow and being run over by the carrier. Four of the crewmembers made the ultimate sacrifice for their country in the accident, as LCDR Blaine Thrasher, LT Tom Walls, AEI Bond and an unidentified passenger were lost at sea. A fifth VQ-2 crewmember, the plane captain, Petty Officer "Rosey" Rozier, miraculously survived to be picked up by the plane guard.
VQ-2 was under the command of CDR Jack Taylor from June 1971 to July 1972. While a relative calm was ongoing in the European theater at the time, the significant military hardware buildup in Soviet client states such as Libya, Syria and Egypt drew the majority of the squadron's attention. This buildup would soon erupt into a period of open hostilities between the Arabs and Israelis.
CDR J.D. Meyer became the 18th skipper of VQ-2 on 6 July 1973 and would soon be faced with a period of extremely high-tempo operations associated with the Yom Kippur War that October. For the extremely valuable electronic reconnaissance operations performed by VQ-2 during that conflict, the squadron was awarded the Navy Unit Commendation.
On 8 March 1974 another EA-3B was lost at sea while recovering on board America (CYA-66). Fortunately no deaths or injuries were associated with the incident, largely due to the superior airman ship of the pilot. LT Dave Longeway kept the Whale in the best possible attitude when ditching became inevitable. Cause of the accident was determined to be the parting of the purchase cable, which is connected to the arresting gear below decks, inside the coupling which attaches to the cross-deck pendant. All seven crewmen exited the aircraft before the Whale, true to its nautical nature, finally sounded, approximately five minutes after water entry. America's rescue helicopter picked up the crew, and LT Longeway was awarded the Air Medal for his superior airmanship.
Tragedy again struck VQ-2 9 July 1974, when the squadron's trainer/logistics aircraft crashed shortly after takeoff from Naples, Italy. The TA-3B was transporting maintenance personnel back to Rota, where they had been involved in repairing another squadron aircraft. Killed in the crash were the pilot, LCDR Dwight L. Worrell, navigator LTJG Douglas N. Davis and six enlisted aircrewmen/ground maintenance personnel: AMN2 Robert F. Carney, ADJ2 Robert S. Charrington, AE2 William P. Beuler, AQ2 John G. Pauljohn, ADJ3 Orval T. May and AE3 Carl F. Schwartz. July 1974 also brought the retirement of the squadron's last EC-121M.

EP-3Es and EA-3Bs are the mainstay of VQ operations since 1974 retirement of last EC-121M. Both aircraft serve faithfully and well but are aging and aged, each having been designed more than 30 years ago. Current plans have an ES-3 version of the Viking to replace the EA-3B.
 Ranger 15 taxis out of the gear on board Saratoga (CV-60) in the fall of 1977. right - Ranger 15 over the Med in "Sandeman" markings used in late '60s and early '70s.
Some Historic Firsts
Five more commanding officers led VQ-2 through the decade of the '70s: CDRs D.J. Alberg, D.N. Hagen, T.A. Peltz, G.J. Hopkins and CAPT J.E. Taylor.
One of these COs recorded a "first" when CDR Dale Hagen became the first Naval Flight Officer to command a VQ squadron. The "nonpilot" aviation officer came into being 16 October 1956 when the first five graduates of the Navigator/Bombardier School at NAS Corpus Christi, Texas, received their Naval Observer wings. Later, in the 1960s, the Naval Aviation Observer (NAO) was created when naval aircraft began to take on missions sufficiently complex to require the fulltime services of an aviation officer other than the pilot. In 1969 the NAOs were redesignated Naval Flight Officers (NFO), given a new style set of wings, and promises of more "positions of responsibility," which translated to commands. The command opportunities for NFOs came slowly, however, as the traditional "pilot as a crew leader" philosophy prevailed.
The author can still vividly recall the frustration experienced as an NFO junior officer in VQ-2 from 1967 until 1970. In those early days, before the "enlightenment", an NFO was not allowed to lead a detachment as officer-in-charge, even if senior to the pilot. Fortunately, the Navy recognized the morale and other implications of such a policy, and by the mid-1970s NFOs had begun to garner a few command positions in Naval Aviation. Since CDR (now RADM) Dale Hagen's tenure, five other NFOs have commanded VQ-2 and a sixth, CDR Tom Quigley, at this writing, awaits in the wings as the XO at NS Rota, Spain.
CAPT J .E. Taylor, who had commanded VQ-2 June 1971-July 1972, bears the distinction of having commanded VQ-2 on two occasions. CAPT Taylor's second command tour came during October 1978-June 1980. The repeat performance occurred as a direct result of an overall deterioration in the quality of squadron operations and a corresponding need for strong, experienced leadership to overcome a difficult period in VQ-2's history. As an individual who had accumulated a total of four previous tours in the two VQ squadrons, as well as 10,000 flight hours, "CAPT Jack" was the logical choice to put VQ-2 back on track. For the three-week unscheduled turnover period until CAPT Taylor was able to return to Rota, CDR Robert L. Prehn came from CTF-67 staff to fill in as interim commanding officer.
CAPT Taylor and his XO, Tom Fritz, had their hands full re-establishing the unit's performance. However, through strong leadership and the dedication of the men and women of VQ-2, the squadron excelled, and was awarded a Meritorious Unit Commendation for the period I March 1979 to 1 April 1980. In part, the citation accompanying the MUC read: "During this period, Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron Two consistently displayed outstanding leadership, unparalleled expertise, and untiring dedication in ensuring the success of vital airborne reconnaissance endeavors."
The Frantic 1980s Begin
Satisfied that VQ-2 was back on course, CAPT Taylor relinquished command of the squadron to CDR Tom Fritz, who led VQ-2 from June 1980 until June 1981. As VQ-2 entered the 1980s, with the usual high standards of excellence restored, the squadron would face perhaps its most dynamic and productive period during peacetime operations. The Arab-Israeli situation, the "Crazy Colonel" Gadhafi in the Gulf of Sidra, a crisis in the Baltic involving Poland and the Soviet Union, and the ever-increasing activity level and modernization of the Soviet Navy, all kept the squadron's assets stretched very thin through CDR John Flynn's command tour. In addition to heavy tasking within the European theater, the Iranian Hostage Crisis and increasing tensions in Nicaragua pulled some of VQ-2's already scarce electronic reconnaissance assets out of their primary theater of operations.
As VQ-2 entered the mid-1980s, the frenzied pace of operations did not let up. The Arab-Israeli Bekka War, the continuing Beirut Crisis with the U.S. Marine barracks bombing, and the Sixth Fleet December 1983 air strike into Lebanon, allowed little leisure time for the squadron.
VQ-2's high op tempo and extreme professionalism from 1 June 1982 till 31 December 1983 did not go unnoticed. During this period VQ-2 won more unit awards than ever before in its history, including the first ever Battle "E" for a fleet air reconnaissance squadron. Under skipper Don East VQ-2 was awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation for the period 1 June 1982-31 May 1983 "for meritorious service in connection with airborne reconnaissance in support of Second, Sixth and Seventh Fleet operations." The award citation went on to say: "Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron Two demonstrated an unprecedented capability to react to contingency requirements in the Atlantic, European and Indian Ocean Theaters. This outstanding performance, during a period of difficult and complex tasking, displayed aggressive enthusiasm and the highest degree of professionalism which made Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron Two the leader in battle group support and signals intelligence collection."
The second award won by VQ-2 during this 18-month period was the Navy Expeditionary Medal for its crucial role in the 1982 Lebanon Crisis. The squadron was awarded the NEM for the period August-November 1982. Finally, on 29 February 1984, VQ-2 was notified that it was recipient of the Battle "E" for 1983. This period spanned six months each of CDR East and CDR John Draper's CO tours. For this award, VQ-2 competed in the Special Mission category for NavAirLant squadrons.
CDR Draper turned over command of VQ-2 to CDR E.A. Caldwell as the situation in the Mediterranean remained intense through the mid-1980s. Terrorism continued to show its ugly head in the Achille Lauro hijacking incident and the follow-on U.S. Navy force-down of the Egyptian airliner carrying the Arab hijackers to freedom. In short order, these incidents were followed by the Rome and Vienna airport slaughters perpetrated by Arab terrorists and the resulting U.S./Libya confrontation. And so, the need for VQ-2's quick-reaction airborne electronic reconnaissance capabilities continued the ever-increasing spiral while the now 26-year-old EA-3B and 22-year-old EP-3Es struggled to meet the fast-paced demands.
Bringing VQ-2 Up to Date
Although one squadron lineman was killed in a ground accident 17 August 1980, VQ-2 experienced a period of no major aircraft accidents or flight casualties during the first seven years of the 1980s. After substantial damage from a bleed air leak in the center wing box to an EA-3B at Rota 5 June 1975 (no injuries), the squadron began a long series of major mishap-free flight hours.
CDR T.L. Hanson assumed command of VQ-2 in January 1986, with CDR Jay R. Kistler as XO, while activity in the Mediterranean remained at a high level. His command tenure began in the midst of the large-scale U.S. Navy operations in the Central Mediterranean off Libya. These operations were a strong message to Gadhafi and his state-sponsored terrorism. During these operations, a muscle-tensing situation developed as a VQ-2 EA-3B, operating from Coral Sea (CV-43), was intercepted by two Libyan MiG-25s 120 miles north of Tripoli. After coming close to the Whale and passing underneath it, the Foxbats left without incident. Interception of U.S. intelligence aircraft is not uncommon and usually passes without incident these days_ But it is never a comfortable situation and the recce crews are always faced with that great uncertainty.
It was VQ-2's operations during crisis situations such as those in the Central Mediterranean, as well as overall superior performance, that led to a second Battle "E" award during this period.
The January 1986 operations in the Central Med would not be the Navy's last encounter with the "Crazy Colonel", however, as two other clashes occurred in late March and mid-April. The first of these began when Sixth Fleet aircraft operating in .international waters of the Gulf of Sidra were fired upon by Libyan SA-5 missiles- During the next 24-hour period at least two Libyan missile patrol boats were destroyed by Navy tactical air and surface combatants, as was the Sirte SA-5 site guidance radar by AGM-88 (HARM) anti-radiation missiles. There were no U.S. losses.
The second period of hostilities occurred in the wake of Libyan terrorist bombings of a Berlin nightclub and a TWA airliner, where U.S. citizens were killed in each case. These Libyan-sponsored terrorist activities drew the military response promised by President Reagan, involving both Sixth Fleet and USAF F-111 assets in a major strike against Al Azziziyah Army Barracks, Tripoli's airport, the port of Sidi Bilal, Al Jumahiriya barracks and Benina Airfield.
 U.S. NAVY AIRBORNE ELECTRONIC RECONNAISSANCE TODAY AND TOMORROW
The People
Today VQ-1 and VQ-2 continue to produce top quality intelligence collection, while flying some of the oldest aircraft and employing some of the most motivated and professional personnel in the fleet. Like any military organization, the fleet air reconnaissance squadrons recognize people as their principal asset. To identify the unique talents of its officer and enlisted aircrewmen, the VQ squadrons employ the following personnel designation descriptions:
1. Mission Commander- The MC designation is reserved for select pilots and NFOs, who by virtue of their extensive knowledge of the principles of electronic warfare, squadron aircraft operations and crew coordination, have been designated by their commanding officer as the individual ultimately responsible for conduct of the mission. This responsibility makes it imperative that the MC maintain full awareness of every aspect of the intelligence collection mission.
2. Electronic Warfare Aircraft Commander- the EWAC is a pilot with a high degree of maturity, experience, aeronautical skill, ability to perform under stress and a knowledge of electronic warfare. His primary responsibility is to ensure the in flight safety of his aircraft and crew.
3. Electronic Warfare Tactical Evaluator - The EVAL is a Naval Flight Officer tasked to manage the planning, collection and reporting requirements of the mission. The political sensitivities inherent in the various areas of VQ operations require the EVAL to be completely knowledgeable in areas of U.S. and foreign national objectives as well as military strategy and tactics.
4. Electronic Warfare Navigator-the EWAN is an NFO with a complete understanding of several navigation systems as well as a thorough knowledge of the airborne electronic reconnaissance mission.
5. Electronic Warfare Aircrewmen- The backbone of the VQ electronic warfare crew is made up of highly professional enlisted naval aircrewmen. The flight engineers on the EP-3E are usually drawn from the AD, AM and AE ratings. They are responsible for overall airworthiness of the airframe, from preflight through completion of postflight. In the EP-3E, the radioman's position is usually manned by an AT who must be fully knowledgeable of the aircraft communication/navigation systems. The EP-3E Airborne Electronic Supervisor, or "tech", is a senior AT who is responsible for ensuring all the sophisticated electronic warfare equipment is in optimum operating condition. The laboratory or "lab" operator is an airborne electronic warfare analyst whose tasks require a detailed knowledge of the complex analysis and recording systems of the aircraft. The bulk of the VQ naval aircrewmen aboard the EP-3E and EA-3B are designated Electronic Warfare Operators (EWOP). These highly trained technicians master the operations of complex electronic reconnaissance equipment as well as the myriad details of electromagnetic signals of interest.
Although the aircrew personnel seem to receive the primary focus of attention and publicity, they could not perform their vital mission effectively and safely without the dedicated efforts of the ground personnel. The VQ squadrons employ an extremely diverse spectrum of ground support personnel who are involved in such areas as aircraft and equipment maintenance, administration, training, intelligence, safety, signals analysis and reporting, legal, public affairs, and a variety of "creature comfort" functions. These personnel are equally as proficient and dedicated as the aircrews in their performance of mission.
In addition to the men and women in uniform, the VQ squadrons also employ a variety of DoD and industry contractor civilian personnel to perform certain highly-specialized functions. These VQ civilian personnel are fondly referred to as "the Q-Crabs".
One group of these civilians is furnished to the VQ squadrons by the Reconnaissance, Electronic Warfare and Space Operations, Navy (REWSON) Division of the U.S. Navy Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command. These individuals, operating in technical/operational pairs, act as special assistants to the VQ squadron CO as well as performing specified engineering functions in the squadron special projects "Bicycle Shop".
"Chuck" Christman began the VQ-1/REWSON association in 1955, and was paired with "Elmer" Ackerberg, who arrived in the mid-1960s. Christman remained with VQ-1 until 1979 when he was replaced by Larry Sharp. Winton Lowery and "Nick" Nickelson began the VQ-2 association in 1967, and were replaced in the 1970s by "Pete" Petersen and Max Richardson. John Boyd and "Mark" Franklin occupy the REWSON billets in VQ-2 today.
Other civilians supporting the VQ squadrons over the years have been the technical representatives (Tech Reps) of the Lockheed and Douglas Aircraft Corporations, as well as intermittent support by various computer and electronics companies. Some of these individuals, such as the late "Danny" King, have been ardent supporters of the VQ community, both on and off duty.
EW Training for VQ-1/VQ-2 Personnel
Part One of this history documented the establishment of the Special Projects School for Air at NAAS San Clemente Island, Calif., on 1 July 1944. Since then the training site for airborne electronic reconnaissance crewmen has relocated on several occasions. At various times the officer and enlisted training could be found in Washington, D.C.; at NAS Glynco, Georgia; or at NAAS Corry Field, Pensacola, Florida. The training for airborne electronic reconnaissance finally settled at Pensacola, at the Naval Technical Training Center Corry Field in 1974 as the Consolidated Navy Electronic Warfare School (CNEWS). The CNEWS facility remains there today, operating several courses structured for the individual needs of the electronic warfare evaluator, electronic warfare aircraft commander, and the various enlisted electronic warfare operators.
The VQ Squadrons Today (1987)
Today at NAS Agana, Guam, VQ-1 operates four EP-3E Aries, two EP-3B Batrack, seven EA-3B Skywarrior, two P-3A and one UP-3A Orion aircraft. At the time of this writing, VQ-1 was under command of CDR Earl R. Smith with a total complement of 120 officers, 950 enlisted and 6 civilian personnel. The squadron remains committed to providing airborne electronic reconnaissance support to Pacific area commanders, under the operational control of Commander Task Force 72 (CTF-72) located in Kami Seya, Japan.
In the past seven years, VQ-1 has monitored the dramatic buildup of the Soviet Pacific Fleet as considerable Kremlin emphasis was shifted to the Far East region. VQ-1 reconnaissance missions provide theater commanders and the national authorities with vital information relating the technical and operational capabilities of this growing Soviet Pacific Fleet. Pacific littoral conflict and crises also have drawn a considerable share of VQ-1 reconnaissance missions in recent years. Such occurrences as the KAL airliner shootdown, frequent flareups in Korea, the Chinese-Vietnamese conflict and the various Persian Gulf crises have kept the squadron on the move.
Finally, VQ-1 plays a major role in fleet exercises, acting as both Blue and Orange electronic reconnaissance assets. The squadron not only provides the opposing commanders with the near real-time intelligence required for tactical decisions, but also gains an excellent opportunity for squadron aircrew training.
At NS Rota, Spain, VQ-2 operates 14 aircraft: six EP-3E, six EA-3B, one P-3A, and one UA-3B. As of this writing, VQ-2 was under command of CDR Jay Kistler and had a total complement of 100 officers, 580 enlisted and 3 civilian personnel. VQ-2 continues its electronic reconnaissance support to European and Atlantic area commanders, under the operational control of Commander Task Force 67 (CTF-67) in NAF Naples, Italy.
In November 1985, VQ-2 celebrated the significant milestone of surpassing 10 1/2 years and a total of 70,000 major mishap-free flight hours. The clock for this record began 5 June 1975, after the EA-3B wing box incident. Attaining 70,000 hours of major mishap-free flying is acknowledged as a significant event in any U.S. Naval Aviation community, but it is especially noteworthy considering the 20-year plus age of the squadron's aircraft.
VQ-2 extended its safety record for more than another year. But on 25 January 1987, as' this history was being prepared, a tragic footnote was written when an EA-3B was lost at sea taking the lives of seven VQ-2 crewmen. The aircraft crashed while embarked in Nimitz (CVN-68), conducting operations in the Central Mediterranean. The Skywarrior, piloted by LTJG Alvin A. Levine, crashed into the water off the port side of Nimitz after an unsuccessful attempt at a night barricade arrestment. The EA-3B, BuNo 144850, broke up upon water impact and sank with no survivors. Subsequent SAR efforts located only debris. The pilot reportedly attempted the barricade arrestment after several unsuccessful tries at conventional arrestments and an aerial refueling. In addition to LTJG Levine, lost in the incident were navigator LCDR Ronald R. Callender, EW evaluators LTs Steven H. Batchelder and James D. Richards; aircrewmen AT3 Richard A. Hertzing, CT3 Patrick R. Price and CT3 Craig R. Rudolph. This incident marked the fifth loss of a VQ EA-3B aircraft while operating from carriers over a span of 23 years.
Because of the geographic and political nature of the region, VQ-2 is constantly stretched to its maximum operational limits. With the high tempo of Soviet naval operations from the Black Sea, Baltic Sea and Northern Fleets in recent years, VQ-2 has spent a considerable amount of time "over the high seas". More importantly, VQ-2's theater of operation has been the scene of one major international crisis after another. For example, since 1980, VQ-2 operations have provided vital information on the Gulf of Sidra clashes, the Polish Worker Crisis, the Bekka War, the continuing East Mediterranean crisis including the evacuations of international civilians and the PLO, the Marine Barracks bombing and the TWA Flight 847 hijacking.
Today, VQ-2 remains heavily involved in support of the Sixth Fleet, conducting operations in the Central Mediterranean off Libya in connection with America's anti-terrorist stance. In addition to a heavily packed operational schedule, VQ-2 continues to provide electronic reconnaissance assets for both Blue and Orange force commanders in regional fleet exercises.
The VQ-2 squadron insignia probably best sums up what airborne electronic reconnaissance is all about. The emblem was designed in 1959 by LT Buckenhauer, who was killed shortly afterward in an aircraft accident. The black bat originally symbolized the P4M-1Q employed by the squadron in its earlier days. Today it represents the EP-3E and EA-3B. The lightning bolts are representative of electronic reconnaissance. The blue field and white stars represent the night sky which is the natural environment of the bat. The clouds represent high altitude flying and the use of cover, symbolizing undetected presence. The outer red border represents the original red field of the squadron flag, flown when VQ-2 was at NAF Port Lyautey, Morocco.
The Future
The future of the Navy's airborne electronic reconnaissance program must be viewed with a mix of pessimism and optimism. Had this research effort been completed before late 1986, a view of the future for VQ-I and -2 would have been entirely pessimistic! The current holders of the VQ legacy appeared to face only more old hand-me-down aircraft and "band aid" fixes for both carrier- and land based assets.
After more than 26 years of faithful service as the VQ carrier-based aircraft, the aging EA-3B is scheduled to be gradually retired by 1992. Tragically, there was to be no organic carrier capability replacement dedicated to airborne electronic reconnaissance. Instead, the replacement capability, named Battle Group Passive Horizon Extension System (BGPHES), was to be a "black box" installed in standard carrier-based S-3 Vikings. In its primary mode, the BGPHES would receive and automatically data link signals back to the carrier where they would be "processed" by non-aircrew personnel.

Refueling from an A-7 in the Whale is, in the opinion of one VQ NFO, "a waste of both your times." It proved too much for a young VQ-2 pilot in Jan 1987, at night and under extreme conditions, resulting in his death and those of his six crewmen in a missed-barrier engagement on board Nimitz (CVN-68).
The disadvantages of such a system were immediately and intuitively obvious. Not only was the S-3 on a short, tight tether to the carrier because of transmission path limitations, but while flying this black box in the electronic reconnaissance role, the S-3 would be effectively taken out of its primary ASW mission. Most importantly, however, there would be no trained and experienced VQ "team in the sky" to provide the all-important operational flexibility and the immediate distillation of information for use by battle group commanders. Instead, there would be a flow of unevaluated information back to the carrier for subsequent evaluation and distillation. Such an operation removed the VQ aircrew talent from the carrier where it has always provided a synergistic interaction with specialized command spaces such as CIC. Perhaps the ultimate flaw in this program was the effective severing of the carrier experience carried back to the VQ squadrons by the EA-3 B detachments. Without this personal fleet input to the VQ squadrons from the tailhook community, the ability of the squadrons to understand and fulfill the information needs of the battle group decision makers would be dramatically diminished.
In late 1986, fleet opposition to the BGPHES concept as a replacement for the EA-3B capability finally resulted in a new approach. This plan involves acquisition of a replacement airframe that will be organic to the carrier, dedicated solely to the mission of airborne electronic reconnaissance, and operated by the fleet experts in this field the VQ-1 and -2 "Batmen". The latest initiative is being processed for the current budget, providing for 16 low-time S-3 airframes. This concept must receive strong and immediate Navy, DoD and Congressional approval if a viable airborne electronic reconnaissance capability is to continue within the carrier battle group/force structure!
The land-based VQ assets also are in a perilous position. The current EP-3E airframes are 21-23 years old and the "backend" sensor equipment is largely of 1960s technology. The EP-3Es are the oldest P-3A airframes currently being operated by the Navy. The only Navy program on the books to upgrade the land-based portion of the VQ capability is called CILOP (Conversion in Lieu of Procurement). This program is another in a historic series of "band aid" fixes to Navy airborne electronic reconnaissance. CILOP involves the conversion of 12 P-3C baseline (original model) Orions as replacements for the ancient EP-3Es. True to tradition, these aircraft are already an average of 10 years old and will be turning 12 or 13 before they enter operational service with VQ-1 and VQ-2. Even worse, the "backend" electronic reconnaissance equipment will initially be mostly the same 1960 technology, simply refurbished and cross-decked from the current EP-3E to the CILOP P-3C.
A researcher will find messages and open public statements where battle group commanders and other Navy leaders have lauded the virtues of the VQ capability. Battle group deployment debriefs and crisis after-action reports have consistently stated that the VQ capability, both carrier- and land-based, was totally indispensable to the conduct of operations. These same commanders have continually stated the operational need for significant improvements and updates to the electronic reconnaissance capability. Amazingly and indescribably, however, until late 1986 these repeated requests had fallen upon deaf ears. Somehow, the lucidly-demonstrated need for modern organic battle group and theater airborne electronic reconnaissance capabilities consistently failed to be translated into actual assets.
Some feel this benign neglect of the VQ capability was primarily due to the age-old unkept promise by the "national sensors" to provide tactical commanders with near real-time operational and technical intelligence data. Others feel it was primarily reluctance on the part of the "hard kill" advocates to recognize the electronic warfare "soft kill" as an integral part of their sensor and weapon suite. In other words, they failed specifically to understand and/or appreciate the force multiplier effect of airborne electronic reconnaissance. Without the explicit support of the "hard kill" bomb, droppers and missile shooters in the U.S. Navy, the miniscule VQ community cannot separately garner the support necessary to obtain and maintain state-of-the-art aircraft platforms and sensors. If the old Navy saying "community size translates to the health and well being of the capability" is true, then it is no wonder the very small VQ program appears terminally ill!
At the moment, the Navy has a nucleus of well trained and motivated personnel with which to conduct the airborne electronic reconnaissance mission. These individuals fully understand the significance of Thomas Jefferson's words "eternal vigilance is the price of liberty." Specifically, as of February 1987, 210 airborne electronic reconnaissance personnel had died in the line of duty. Without strong and immediate support for the VQ community, 44 years of history, tradition and urgently required operational capability will rapidly cease to exist in the U.S. Navy
This history is dedicated to those two hundred men who gave their lives under hostile fire and in aircraft accidents while involved in airborne electronic reconnaissance in the service of their country. Memories of their ultimate sacrifice and dedication will bear the VQ community through the lean years.
 "Greater love hath no man, that he give up his life for others."
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author is grateful to CAPTs Jack Taylor and "J.D." Meyer who took the time to make corrections to the first draft, and to provide photographs, newspaper clippings and their personal remembrances to this effort. Other individuals who provided significant data inputs and/or photographs were: MCPO Bill Dickson, USN(Ret); Winton Lowery, Pete Petersen and Chuck Christman, who were with VQ-1/2 as REWSON employees; LT George Phillips; Rex Glasby; LCDR Dick McBurnett; CAPT Bob Christman; CAPT Ivan Hughes; Bob Phillips; CDR Don Hubbard, USN(Ret); Freeman Dias; Roy Grossnick, Naval Aviation Historian; and Mike Walker of the Navy Operational Archives. Also, my wife Lou contributed significantly to this project with her patient proofreading expertise and encouragement during severe periods of Rhode Island wintertime "cabin fever".
Additionally, the author wishes to cite the following publications as sources for his research:
Bamfort, James. The Puzzle Palace. Houghton Mifflin Company: Boston, 1982.
Carroll, John M. Secrets of Electronic Espionage. E.P. Dutton and Company: New York, 1966.
Infield, Glenn B. Unarmed and Unafraid. The MacMillan Company: London, 1970.
Price, Alfred. The History of U.S. Electronic Warfare, Volume I. The Murray

Circa 1951
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...For a short time, 05/25/51 - 09/30/51, the unit that became the Special Project Division of the Air Operations Department of NS Sangley Point, Philippines was atttached to VC-11 Miramar Detachment. We were flying the first (and only) P4M-1Q aircraft in the Pacific Fleet. The four plane group later became VW-1 Det Able and then VQ-1. In the past few months I have located almost all of the original 12 pilots that formed the group. I am still looking for Horace H. "Howdy" Taylor 505697, Warren D. "Bud" Britton 535204, and Duane J. Hofhine 534430. VC-11 Miramar Detachment Operational Training NAAS Miramar Navigation & Technical Publications Officer, P4M-1Q unit..." Contributed by Mel Davidow meldavidow@earthlink.net [26APR98]
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...The lineage of VQ-1's "World Watchers" can be traced back to two PBY-5A Catalina "Black Cats" modified for electronic reconnaissance during World War II. The unit formally established as the Special Electronic Search Project at NAS Sangley Point, Philippines, in October 1951. By 13 May 1953, when it was redesignated Detachment Able of Airborne Early Warning Squadron One (VW-1), the unit operated four P4M-1Q Mercator aircraft. When Detachment Able was reorganized into Electronic Countermeasures Squadron One (VQ-1) at Iwakuni, Japan on 1 June 1955, it was the first squadron dedicated to electronic warfare. The A-3 Skywarrior, or "Whale" as it came to be known, served the squadron for the next three decades. In 1960, not only was VQ-1 moved to Atsugi, Japan and redesignated Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron ONE, but the last Mercator was retired and replaced by the first of many WV-2Q Super Constellations. The "Willie Victor" would remain the backbone of VQ-1's long range, land-based reconnaissance efforts through the Vietnam Era and into the 1970's. The squadron's involvement in the Vietnam War started characteristically, at the very beginning when a Skywarrior crew was awarded the Navy Unit Commendation for their role in the Gulf of Tonkin incident of 2 - 5 August 1964. For the next nine years, VQ-1 would operate from Danang, Cubi Point, Bangkok, aircraft carriers on patrol in Yankee Station and other bases in Southeast Asia. VQ-1's aircrews supported countless air strikes and are credited with assisting in the destruction of numerous MiG aricraft and Komar patrol boats. The first EP-3 Aries I joined the squadron in 1969, beginning the replacement program for the Super Constellations, which was competed in 1974. In 1971, the VQ-1 moved its homeport to NAS Agana, Guam. At that time it absorbed Heavy Photographic Squadron SIXTY ONE (VAP-61) and its former parent unit, VW-1. For a time VQ-1 consisted of thirty aircraft: sixteen Skywarriors, twelve Super Constellations and two Orions. After the departure of the last Skywarrior in the late 1980's, the squadron flew the EP-3 Aries I exclusively. In 1991 the squadron closed its permanent detachment in Atsugi, Japan after 30 years and moved it to NAF Misawa, Japan. In the same year, VQ-1 received the first EP-3E Aries II, an upgraded version of the Aries I using modified P-3C airframes. The squadron played a key role in Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm. Despite the harsh, difficult maintenance environment and 30 year old aircraft, VQ-1 amassed nearly 1400 combat flight hours with a 100% mission completion rate. Tasking included strike support, combat search and rescue, communications and over-the-horizon-targeting support to coalition forces. In 1994, as a result of the base closure of NAS Agana, VQ-1 was notified of the homeport change to NAS Whidbey Island, Washington. Coincidentally, in July 1994, VQ-1 retired the Navy's oldest operational P-3, EP-3E Aries I BUNO 148887. Its retirement also marked VQ-1's transition to all EP-3E AIRIES II mission aircraft. Today, VQ-1 provides electronic reconnaissance from the east coast of Africa to the west coast of the United States. The squadron maintains a permanent detachment in NAF Misawa, Japan and has maintained a continuous presence in the Arabian Gulf since July 1992..." http://www.naswi.navy.mil/vq-1/history.html
Circa 1950
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...VQ-1 and VQ-2, commissioned in the mid 1950s, were preceded by specially equipped aircraft and trained crews in small detachments with an Officer in Charge (OIC) administratively attached to other squadrons and units under operational control of the local theatre commanders, CINCNELM and CINCPAC, and responsible to the Special Project Division OP-922Y in the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO). Some of these squadrons were VC-11, VP-26, VW-1 Detachment A, VW-2 Detachment A, NCU-32G, and NCU-38N. Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadrons One and Two (FAIRECONRON) are VQ-1 and VQ-2, initially designated Electronic Countermeasures Squadrons (ECMRON) until re-designated in 1960. I have compiled a list of the personnel who died in VQ aircraft accidents, and will provide it upon an email request...Chuck Huber charles379@webtv.net..." [16JAN2003]
Circa 1944 - 1967 (P4M Story)
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...Historic Aircraft by Norman Polmar - Author, Ships and Aircraft of the U.S. Fleet - June 2009 - Page 10-11 - Naval History, U.S. Naval Institute, Annapolis, Maryland (410) 268-6110 http://www.usni.org - Squadrons Mentioned: VP-21 , VQ-1 and VQ-2..." Forwarded by the U.S. Naval Institute/Jim Caiella http://www.usni.org/ [27MAY2009]

Historic Aircraft by Norman Polmar 410KB
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...THE MARTIN P4M MERCATOR - by Richard R. Burgess and Robert F. Dorr. Squadrons Mentioned: VC-11, VP-21, VQ-1, VQ-2, VW-1, VW-2 and VW-3..." Forwarded by Mike Yared mike_yared@hotmail.com [09MAY2006]
The way pilots remember it, the Martin P4M-1 Mercator was created to lay mines during the invasion of Japan, scheduled for 1946. But few publications of its era had much to say about the Mercator, and even a Glenn L. Martin press release was notable for its succinctness: "The Martin Mercator is a long-range naval patrol aircraft with a combined power plant of reciprocating engines and turbojets."
The Mercator flew with just one US Navy patrol squadron (VP-21) as the P4M-1 before entering the sinister world of Cold War "black cover" reconnaissance as the P4M-1Q. Today, not many remember that a P4M-1Q was shot down by Chinese MiGs near Shanghai or that a second P4M-1Q was attacked by North Korean MiGs, while several others escaped similar fates. In the 1950s, not even the fact of reconnaissance was admitted publicly. Officially the spy-in-the-sky P4M-1Q Mercator belonged first to "warning" and later to "electronic countermeasures" squadrons even though, in fact, it never performed either duty.
Contemporary with the better-known Lockheed P2V Neptune, the Martin Model 219 or P4M-1 Mercator reflected the Navy's interest, late in World War II, in combining the benefit of high performance over target with very long range. The solution, in the case of the Mercator, was a "mix" of reciprocating and jet engines. The Mercator's powerplant comprised two 2,975hp Pratt & Whitney R4360 Wasp Major radial engines (among the biggest and most complex piston engines ever put into the air) plus two 3,825lb (1,735kg) thrust Allison J33-A-17 turbojet engines, with each nacelle holding one reciprocating and one jet engine. This compound prop-jet arrangement has been compared with the Neptune, but the latter did not have jets added to its two piston engines until long after entering service, and then only as an afterthought. The Mercator was a prop-jet warplane from the beginning. Apart from its unique power, the Mercator was orthodox in appearance, a cantilever shoulder-wing monoplane with retractable landing gear. The Mercator was noteworthy for the slender, graceful shape of its fuselage and wing. There were two airfoils to each wing, the center panel offering higher lift (NACA 2417) and the outer panel offering higher speed (NACA 2412). As pilot Dean B. North recalls, "[t]he airfoils were physically so different that you could see the fairing where they met. This made for wicked stall characteristics because the outer section would stall first."
Two XP4M-1 prototypes (bureau nos. 02789/02790) were ordered on 6 July 1944. Today, few documents survive to shed light on the development of this interesting aircraft. A paper classified CONFIDENTIAL at the time and signed by William K. Ebel, Vice President of Engineering at Martin, proposes versions with and without guns to straddle both sides of the "speed vs. armament" equation. In addition to the robustly-armed Mercator which eventually emerged, Ebel proposed a "second experimental (Alternate) airplane, a stripped version of the first with external radome in the nose in lieu of the nose turret, the deck turret and side waist guns removed, and all other external protuberances held to a minimum." The second XP4M-1 Mercator (bureau no. 02790) was eventually completed in this solid-nose, "slick" configuration--but the US Navy settled upon an armed version.
In fact, the original XP4M-1 Mercator was armed to the teeth. The Emerson X250SE-2 nose turret held two .50-caliber (12.7mm) machineguns with 300 rounds each, an armament fit which was changed to two 20mm cannons on production aircraft. The Martin 250CE-24 deck turret on the Mercator's dorsal spine held .50-caliber (12.7mm) machineguns with 400 rounds each. Two flexible waist guns of the same caliber were provided with 300 rounds per gun, while the Martin X-220CH-2 tail turret held two 20mm T-31 cannons with 300 rounds per gun. Armor plate was located ahead of, and behind, the flight deck and the windscreen included sections of 2in armor glass.
The first XP4M-1 (bureau no. 02789) flew on 20 September 1946. This aircraft apparently had three-bladed propellers rather than the four-blade type used on the second prototype and on production machines.
After a protracted development program, a further nineteen P4M-1 production aircraft were built (bureau nos. 121451/121454, 122207/122209, and 124362/124373), with production concluding in September 1950. The P4M-1 had R4360-20 piston engines with power increased to 3,250hp instead of the R4360-4s on the prototype, and J33-A-23 turbojets replacing J33-A-17s.
Among other changes, production P4M-1s had a redesigned tail turret shape, a pair of nose 20mm cannons in lieu of .50-caliber (12.7mm) machineguns, and no waist guns. The production P4M-1 made its first flight in September 1949. Patrol Squadron 21 (VP-21), located at NAS Patuxent River, Maryland and at the time equipped with Consolidated PB4Y-2 Privateers, took delivery of its first P4M-1 (bureau no. 122208) on 28 June 1950.
Soon afterward, VP-21 deployed to NAF Port Lyautey, Morocco. No competition for Neptunes performing antisubmarine patrols in the Mediterranean, VP-21's Mercators were assigned minelaying duties, although crewmen recall actually carrying mines only rarely. "Mainly our job was to get up to speed in learning how to fly what was still a new aircraft type in the Navy," recalls pilot Jim Rex. "What was a typical mission like? In VP-21, all I can say is, we flew around a lot."
When pilot Sam Linder arrived at NAF Port Lyautey, Morocco, "the squadron was experiencing what seemed to be a lot of aircraft maintenance problems. In particular, the jet engine had had blade failures in other applications in the Navy, so their use was restricted in the P4M. They were started and kept on idle for takeoffs and landings (emergency use only) and the aircraft had to do all flying with the recips only. There was a feeling that the squadron could not operate effectively away from its support base at NAS Patuxent River, Maryland." A series of highly successful and very public long-range flights helped to improve squadron confidence and morale. Later in the Mercator's career, jet engines were employed without restrictions.
VP-21 occasionally practiced with the wide range of ordnance which could be accommodated in the Mercator's bomb bay (and directed by the bombardier's AN/APA-5A radar bomb sight). Possible bombloads included twelve 325lb (147kg) depth bombs, twelve 100lb (45kg) or 1,000lb (454kg) conventional bombs, up to six 2,000lb (907kg) bombs, twelve Mk. 26-1 aerial mines, or two 2,222lb (1,008kg) aerial torpedoes. These disparate ordnance loads were accommodated in a "horizontal" bay which made it unnecessary to stack bombs one above the other: the horizontal arrangement became a trademark on Martin's XB-51 and B-57 Canberra bombers.
For all its lethality, the Mercator sometimes functioned with VP-21 as nothing more than a fancy transport. Recalls Linder: "Our wing commander discovered that we had the only comfortable aircraft in his air wing. The other squadrons had P2V-4/5 Neptunes, which were having engine problems then, and besides you couldn't stand up straight in a P2V. So he called on us for all sorts of trips to carry him around his domain."
VP-21 had ten P4M-1s on strength until it began giving up these aircraft for P2V-6 Neptunes in February 1953.
In 1950, the Navy began modifying the Mercator to the electronic reconnaissance role as the P4M-1Q. The new mission of the Martin aircraft was to intercept and collect radar emissions from the air defense networks of the Soviet Union and its allies. This work was performed at the Overhaul and Repair Facility at NAS Norfolk, Virginia, and the first P4M-1Q made its maiden flight in February 1951.
The Naval Air Test Center at NAS Patuxent River, Maryland lost a Mercator (bureau no. 121452) when it crashed into the Chesapeake Bay on 8 March 1951, killing all four crewmen aboard. The aircraft literally flew into the water with its right wing down. It's unclear whether this aircraft had been converted to P4M-1Q standard before the mishap. Despite the mishap, the big, powerful Mercator was ideal for Cold War snooping duties, since it could carry a heavy payload of equipment and a large number of radar intercept operators over long distances. The P4M-1Q is credited with an operational range of 2,000mi (3,219km). Company documents give its service ceiling as 34,600ft (10,545m), although a fully-loaded -1Q model actually could attain only about half that, peaking at 16,900ft (7,666m). While far from invulnerable to communist MiG-15 and MiG-17 fighters (as events were to prove), the P4M-1Q routinely cruised at 180 knots monitoring radar emissions but, if threatened, could bring its two jet engines on line and accelerate to 340 knots.
In October 1951, after six months of training with composite squadron VC-11 at NAS Miramar, California, four P4M-1Qs began operations from NS Sangley Point, Philippines, in a unit which underwent several name changes over the years. Known at first as the Special Products Division of the Air Operations Department, this P4M-1Q reconnaissance outfit became Detachment A of Airborne Early Warning Squadron One (VW-1) on 13 May 1953 and was re-named Detachment A of VW-3 in June 1954.
All of these names were cover for the P4M-1Q covert reconnaissance missions. "The connection with VW-3 was fiction," remembers pilot Don Angier. "In fact, during a visit the VW-3 skipper dragged us aside and wanted to know what we were doing. We wouldn't tell him." Painted a flat blue-gray, with no markings except national insignia and bureau numbers which were often bogus (194873 was one), these Mercators collected electronic emanations from Vietnam, China, North Korea and the U.S.S.R. for analysis by the National Security Agency. "14 hour patrols were not unusual," remembers Angier, "starting from NS Sangley Point, Philippines and ending at Atsugi [in Japan] with lots of coast lines in between." More typical missions, however, were eight to nine hours. Nearly all missions were carried out at night and in the dark of the moon, without lights. "At certain times of the month, we sat on the ground because the moon was too bright."
There is little to add to Angier's description of a mission which meant very long sorties, inside a very loud aircraft, prowling the frontiers of the communist nations. This cloak-and-dagger work along the electromagnetic spectrum consisted of gathering and analyzing communist radar emanations. The P4M-1Q can be readily distinguished from the P4M-1 by a chin-mounted "beard" fairing which contains a radar-intercept device.
For the reconnaissance role, the 14-man crew of a P4M-1Q consisted of pilot, co-pilot, navigator (who was trained as an aviator), electronics officer, six intercept operators, a plane captain (who doubled as "relief" on the gun turrets) and three gunners.
On 1 June 1955, the NS Sangley Point, Philippines-based unit became Electronic Countermeasures Squadron One (VQ-1) with a PR tail code. The squadron had no countermeasures mission, but its new title came closer to identifying its reconnaissance role. (As the Mercator era neared its end, on 1 January 1960, the more accurate term Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron was applied to VQ-1 and similar units). The squadron had been using, and continued to use, the static callsign DEEP SEA though it often usurped callsigns belonging to other units on ferret flights. VQ-1's first commander was Lt. Comdr. E. R. Hall. In 1955, its strength rose from four Mercators to six. In October of that year, the squadron relocated to NAS Iwakuni, Japan.
Halfway around the world, a second Mercator reconnaissance unit was formed at NAF Port Lyautey, Morocco in mid-1950, originally designated the NAF Patrol Unit. Four P4M-1Q Mercators were on strength, plus a stripped Lockheed P2V-2 Neptune for crew training. Research by Captain Don East, USN, indicates that one of this unit's Mercators, piloted by a Lieutenant Huddleston, was fired upon by communist fighters in 1951 or 1952, but details are hazy; reportedly, one crewman was killed. This could be a garbled version of a 7 February 1952 incident when the NAF Patrol Unit (the future VQ-2) lost a P4M-1Q (bureau no. 124371) piloted by LT Robert B. Rager which ditched at sea following failure of the port reciprocating engine. All 18 crew members were rescued but an RAF airman was killed when his Sea Otter from Nicosia, Cyprus, crashed during the rescue effort.
This P4M-1Q outfit became Detachment A of Airborne Early Warning Squadron Two (VW-2) by May 1953 although, in the manner of its Far East counterpart, it had no actual connection with VW-2. The unit became Electronic Countermeasures Squadron Two (VQ-2) with a JQ tail code on 1 September 1955.
VQ-1 and VQ-2 crews were very much at the vanguard of a "secret war" in the 1950s, when spy planes gathered signals intelligence (a term which encompasses radar, electronic, and communications intelligence), tested the frontiers of the communist world, and "tickled" air defense networks, in order to gauge the reaction. While reconnaissance is carried out more or less openly today, these men lived in a world where their duties could not be admitted in public. Until August 1956, their aircraft did not wear standard markings. The bureau numbers painted on the P4M-1Qs were not merely bogus; they were nonsensical. And, as a pilot remembers, "we changed them once a month"--though it is difficult to know why, since the communists certainly knew what the Mercators were doing and could have cared less about bureau numbers.
During a typical mission while heading toward hostile borders, crews frequently checked their guns, particularly after the 1956 shootdown. Pilot Captain Norman S. Bull recalls: "We test-fired before going on track. The flight deck received a lot of smoke and made breathing less than wonderful inside." In a sense, it was downhill after that. Much of a typical mission consisted of boredom. Rarely did Mercators make headlines.
The Mercator was well regarded by those who flew it, but the huge R4360 engine was complex, difficult to learn, a maintenance nightmare. VQ-1's move to NAS Iwakuni, Japan almost certainly was made, in part, to co-locate the unit with two squadrons of Marine Corps Fairchild R4Q-1 Flying Boxcars, employing the same powerplant. This way, as Bull puts it, "the Navy could lump all of its R4360 problems together in one place." Pilot Dean B. North is less pessimistic. The R4360 "may have been heavy," North recalls, "but it just kept on turning under difficult circumstances. It wouldn't come apart or otherwise turn on you like the Wright R3350" used on the P2V Neptune. "For the 28 cylinders (seven in each radial, four radials) it had the normal two magnetos, but had seven distributors, one for each row (front to back) of four cylinders. Once, I had a distributor rotate 180 degrees, yet the engine kept running. It backfired enough to tear all the exhaust stacks off and blow the carburetor inlet housing off, but it kept on running, which was extremely important considering we were over Haiphong at the time." Bull speaks of the reciprocating engines with less enthusiasm than North, however, and notes that "they failed terribly" and often. A little-noted fact about the Mercator is that its vertical stabilizer was slightly offset from the fuselage centerline to counter torque from the powerful piston engines--what North calls "built-in right rudder."
North remembers a problem with the gross weight of the P4M-1Q. "It was designed for 82,500lb [37,421kg]" before the conversion to -1Q standard. For its reconnaissance duties, "the P4M-1Q had so much equipment, it couldn't be installed and stay under this figure. The `fix' was a pen and ink change to the aircraft manuals which altered gross weight to 92,500lb [41,957kg]. Fully loaded at the latter weight, the plane was sluggish to say the least. After climbing to 5,000ft [1,548m] to cruise, when the jet engines were secured, it took climb power on the 4360s to barely maintain altitude. The center of gravity almost went off the rear limits when all the ECM equipment was installed, all aft of the wing. Handling the aircraft became more difficult as the bomb bay fuel tanks were expended of fuel. If you flew on autopilot for an hour and then disengaged autopilot, the nose would head skyward."
Worse, there were instances when improper maintenance to the Mercator's quirky, 15ft 1in (4.67m) four-bladed Aero Products A-644FN propellers nearly caused an engine to tear from its mount. This came to a head during a reconnaissance mission along the Chinese coast on 15 June 1955 when, in one moment of catastrophe, the port reciprocating engine fell completely from a P4M-1Q (bureau no. 124362), throwing the heavy Mercator into a flat spin. "The prop was out of balance and it tore the engine off," remembers Lieutenant Jim Edixon, the pilot at the time. "It sounded like a 20mm [cannon shell] going off inside the airplane." Edixon remembers that because of propeller torque, "had it been the right side, it would have torn the airplane apart."
In fact, only skillful piloting by Edixon saved the crew and 124362 which (as we shall see) was a jinxed airplane. Only through quick thinking and skilled airmanship, Edixon was able to recover from the spin at 3,000ft (928m) with the aid of the jet engines. Incredibly, after he nursed the P4M-1Q to a safe landing at NAF Naha, Okinawa, Japan 100 miles (161km) away, Edixon became the only casualty of the mishap when he sprained an ankle stepping down from the aircraft.
In the same location a year later, another Mercator was in danger of losing a reciprocating engine but the crew was able to feather the propeller before the engine could tear from its mount.
On 22 August 1956 (16:25Z, or 00:25 local time, 23 August) one of many hot flashes of the Cold War occurred when a P4M-1Q Mercator of VQ-1 (the ill-fated bureau no. 124362, but wearing the bogus bureau no. 187642) was shot down by Chinese fighters. The Mercator, flying a radar intelligence mission, was 32mi (51km) east of Wenchow on the China coast and 180mi (290km) north of Formosa in the general region of Shanghai, flying a southerly course at 6,000ft (1,858m) and 180 knots airspeed. The weather was scattered clouds with moderate winds and the very full moon that Mercator crews usually avoided. The Mercator crew of four officers and 12 enlisted men was under instruction to remain at least 20mi (32km) off the Chinese coastline.
A report, once TOP SECRET but since declassified, explains, "[a]t the time of the attack the aircraft sent one code group message and repeated it once. Transmission was then abruptly stopped." The message from pilot Lt. Comdr. Milton Hutchinson, when decoded, said, "Under attack by enemy aircraft."
At 1817Z on 23 August 1956 (2:17 a.m. local time) two destroyers were directed to proceed to the scene to search for survivors. P2V Neptunes from NAF Naha, Okinawa, Japan-based VP-4 joined in the search. Aircraft from Task Force 77 carriers USS Lexington (CV-16) and USS Essex (CV-9) provided cover for the search effort.
The search on 23 August 1956 yielded no results. The next day, however, proved fruitful when the search was moved to the vicinity of the Chusan archipelago and four AD Skyraiders from Lexington sighted wreckage seven miles (11km) east-southeast of Lang Kang Shan Island, 20mi (32km) from the initial search datum point. Under cover of two Skyraiders, the radar picket destroyer USS Dennis J. Buckley (DDR-808) recovered the body of one crewman, Petty Officer 1/c Albert P. Mattin, two empty life rafts, a main wheel and tire, and two bomb bay fuel tanks, one of which was marked "P4M." Three more bodies eventually were recovered, with the other 12 crewmen listed as missing. A MiG gun projectile was later removed from one of the bomb bay tanks at NAS Iwakuni, Japan. Though the circumstances are not known and hostile action was not involved, US Navy records show that a P4M-1Q Mercator of VQ-2 (bureau no. 124372) was stricken on 27 July 1958 as a result of an unspecified mishap that occurred on 19 November 1957.
On 6 January 1958, a NAF Port Lyautey, Morocco-based P4M-1Q belonging to VQ-2 (bureau no. 124373) crashed at Ocean View, Virginia. Four crewmen were killed and two injured. The fuselage of the aircraft opened up directly in front of radioman Tom York and he walked out, unfazed and unscathed. Another P4M-1Q belonging to VQ-1 (bureau no. 122209) barely survived an encounter with hostile aircraft on 16 June 1959 when it was shot up by North Korean MiG-17 interceptors. The previous day. the Mercator flew a routine track over the Sea of Japan from NAS Iwakuni, Japan to NAF Misawa, Japan identical in reverse to the track it was to fly on the date of the incident.
According to the official report, the Mercator departed Misawa at 8:08 a.m. local time, proceeding on "a northwesterly course at altitudes between 6,000ft [1,858m] and 7,500ft [2,322m] to a point over the Sea of Japan approximately one hundred miles [161km] off the Coast of Siberia." The Mercator flew its planned track in "westerly and southerly directions, roughly parallel to the coast, to the point at which the attack occurred." For 25 minutes immediately prior to the attack, "the P4M had been on a heading which would have taken it to a point on the Korean coast south of the United Nations Truce Line. Coincident with the beginning of the attack, the P4M was 78mi [126km] east of Wonsan, North Korea, and commencing a left turn to a southeasterly course away from land."
At 12:12 p.m. local time (0815Z), two "silver-colored MiG type fighter aircraft, bearing red star markings on the fuselage abaft the cockpit, appeared high astern of the P4M, already in their attacking runs. One MiG passed overhead without firing but the other opened fire on his initial pass, hitting the P4M on the port side. Employing standard fighter tactics, the MiGs made at least five passes, three of which were firing runs. On the second firing run, the P4M tail gunner [Petty Officer Second Class Eugene Corder] was ready but the MiG fired first, seriously wounding him and knocking his turret out of action." Radioman James A. Dendy, who was in the squadron but not aboard, remembers that Corder never fired a round. According to Dendy, Corder was an electrician, not a gunner, who was sitting in the aft position while the tail gunner, named Nelson, was elsewhere in the aircraft. The failure to return fire caused President Eisenhower to question publicly "why his boys were not armed," claims Dendy. Getting shot at was also part of the job, Dendy opines: "If these people will tell you the truth, they've seen the street lights in Vladivostok, Russia more than once." (Radioman Joe Price remembers, "We used to go up north when the Russian fleet came out of Vladivostok in the spring.")
Upon sighting the MiGs, the Mercator pilot, Lt. Comdr. Donald Mayer, sent out a distress call, gave orders to open fire, and dived the aircraft to fifty feet, or fifteen meters, above the water. The MiGs followed and "pressed home their attacks for approximately five minutes. After breaking off the last attack, the MiGs pulled straight up to a high altitude and disappeared to the north." Four USAF fighters based at Itazuke, Japan launched to cover the Mercator as it headed for Japan and four South Korean fighters established a patrol over the Korean coast to intercept any attempts to finish off the P4M-1Q.
"Fighting damaged controls and two dead engines at altitudes varying from fifty to two thousand feet, the pilot and co-pilot, in a masterful display of airmanship, nursed their crippled P4M-1Q to the Japanese airbase at Miho, on the where a successful landing was made." According to Captain East's research, the extraordinary physical strength of the co-pilot, Lt. Comdr. Vincent Anania, a former All-American football player at the Naval Academy, helped keep the crippled plane airborne. The pilot and copilot were awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross, the rest of the crew received Air Medals, and Corder, wounded, received a Purple Heart award.
As reconnaissance missions continued, halfway around the world a P4M-1Q Mercator belonging to VQ-2 (bureau no. 124365) crashed on 16 January 1960 [other sources say 19 January] while operating out of Incirlik, Turkey, killing 16 crewmen on board.
VQ-2 withdrew its last remaining P4M-1Qs from service in April 1960, scrapping them at Rota, Spain. VQ-1 retired its last P4M-1Q in a ceremony at NAS Atsugi, Japan on 2 July 1960. The Mercator's missions were assumed by A3D-1Q/2Q Skywarriors and WV-2Q Warning Stars in both squadrons. Pilot North remembers that the last time he saw a P4M-1Q Mercator, it was derelict at Atsugi, devoid of engines and rotting in the out-of-doors, "a sad way to look at a fine aircraft that served us so well." No examples of the Mercator survive today.
The authors would like to thank P4M crew members Angier, Bull, Dendy, Edixon, Linder, North and Rex, the Operational Archives and the Naval Aviation History Office of the Naval Historical Center and the Glenn L. Martin Museum, for assistance with this article.
Circa Unknown Can you identify the Month and or Year?
A BIT OF HISTORY:  VQ-1 Patch Contributed by Tom Grannis grannis1@earthlink.net [11JUL2004]
A BIT OF HISTORY: "The Flying Elvises" [17SEP99]
A BIT OF HISTORY: "VQ-1 DET ECHO Desert Storm" [17OCT99]
A BIT OF HISTORY: "VQ-1 DET ECHO Shield/Desert Storm" [17OCT99]
A BIT OF HISTORY: "VQ-1 DET ECHO Desert Storm" [17OCT99]
A BIT OF HISTORY: VQ-1 Aircrew Logo [19FEB2000]
A BIT OF HISTORY: VQ-1 Det Patch [15DEC99]
A BIT OF HISTORY: "VQ-1 DET ECHO Desert Storm" [24DEC99]
A BIT OF HISTORY: [11MAY99]
A BIT OF HISTORY: [27APR99]
A BIT OF HISTORY:  VQ-1 Patch Contributed by Tom Grannis grannis1@earthlink.net [20MAY2002]
A BIT OF HISTORY:  VQ-1 Patch Contributed by Tom Grannis grannis1@earthlink.net [20JAN2004]
A BIT OF HISTORY:  VQ-1 Patch Contributed by Tom Grannis grannis1@earthlink.net [17MAY20004]
A BIT OF HISTORY:  VQ-1 Patch Contributed by Tom Grannis grannis1@earthlink.net [27APR2004]
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...Pinning ceremony. The group show as taken in the VQ-1 hangar in NAS Misawa, Japan..." Contributed by MARTIN, AEC Garry E. garry11mm@yahoo.com [15APR2001]
 

A BIT OF HISTORY: "...LETTER OF APPRECIATION - Republic of Korea..." Contributed by CARPENTER, CTOCS(AW) Ed ecarp@iserv.net [21MAY2001]
REPUBLIC OF KOREA Letter of Appreciation
(Translation)
TO: Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron One Detachment ATSUGI BOX 43 FPO Seattle 98767
It gives me great pleasure to express my appreciation to the Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron One Detachment ATSUGI for outstanding meritorious service while engaged in operations following the tragic shooting down of Korean Air Lines Flight 007. During this period, the members of Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron One Detachment ATSUGI demonstrated strong resolve and selfless dedication to duty by persistent execution of the task at hand. Your extraordinary accomplishfller1t in this humanitarian operation resulted in outstanding support toward the prosecution of the mission.
In recognition of and with appreciation for your outstanding service to the Republic of Korea, I present this letter of appreciation with my personal good wishes for continued success in the future.
YOON SUNG MIN Minister of National Defense
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...A tale for VQ-1...While a Combat Talon MC130E Chariot of Armageddon crew was on a layover at Agana some time back, they came upon the VQ-1 flag, one each, unsecured. The details have since become hazy but it is remembered that the crew, in the spirit of airmanship, found it disturbing that such a prized and honored Naval relic should be left where it could be pilfered by less honorable persons. The crew secured the flag in a most professional means and manner and then went on to celebrate this interservice task. Unfortunately, all good things must come to an end and the crew found themselves about to depart Guam. They were recalled to parking and found themselves surrounded by a band of shotgun armed contract Naval security personnel...aka Marines...the aircraft commander heroically placed himself between the armed mob and his crew and politely asked what the problem was. After much gesturing and pointee-talkee and hand signals, it was determined that the guards wanted to inspect the MC130E for contraband, specifically the VQ-1 flag that had once again, been misplaced, and unfortunately, left the Talon crew blamed for its disappearance. The aircraft commander knew immediately that the militia wanted to inspect his crew and aircraft for the classified equipment that was onboard. After quieting the guards down, they were shouting 'you attack us' 'you steal our stuff' 'you apologize', and giving them Hershey's bars and a written promise never to land on Guam again, the crew took off. As for the flag...that's another story...Jim McClain USAF Ret BanzaiSGI@aol.com..." [15APR2001]
A BIT OF HISTORY: "...The P4M-1 Martin Mercator was designed primarily for antisubmarine warfare, and competed with the Lockheed P2V Neptune for Navy procurement in the mid-to-late 1940s. The aircraft first flew on 20 September 1946; the last of 21 aircraft bought by the Navy was delivered in September 1950. VP-21 got the first aircraft. The P4M originally was designed for a nine-man crew. Its propulsion was provided by two Pratt and Whitney R-4360s, producing 3,200 horsepower, and two Allison J-33s, 4,6000-pound-thrust engines. It had an operating range of 2,000 smiles and a ceiling of 17,000 feet. It could cruise at 150 knots or dash up to 340 knots with all four engines on line. The Q-configuration was installed in the P4M-1 that was delivered to the Patrol Unit/NavComUnit 32G in February/March 1951. The back-end installation was unsatisfactory, so work to modify the configuration commenced immediately. Four APR-4s and four APR-9s were installed - each with its own tuning unit and panoramic adaptor. An improved intercom system isolated the cockpit and forward stations from the operators and the supervising evaluator. The evaluator could talk to each or all of his operators and the pilot; the pilot could override and be heard by all crew members for flight safety. Each operator position also had a direction-finding capability and wire recorder. The evaluator had an SLA-1 pulse analyzer that could be switched to receive video and audio signals from any operator position. A camera mounted on the SLA-1 camera harness was solenoid-actuated by the first video signal pulse so that the visual record of an intercept could be achieved. This was an exceptionally useful tool in cases where the signals were of very short duration because it permitted later analysis. Frequency coverage was from 50 to 10,750. This configuration was incorporated in three additional P4M-1Qs, which arrived to replace all of the PB4Y-2s by June 1951. Lieutenant Robert L. Ashford, U. S. Naval Reserve, was the original designer. The configuration eventually served as the basis for the modification of the WV-2 and A-3B aircraft to a Q-configuration (WV-2Q/EC-121M/and EA-3B). These aircraft became operational in the Tactical Electronic Warfare Squadrons, VQ-1 and VQ-2, a few years later..." "Cold War Snooper" by R. C. M. Ottensmeyer, NAVAL HISTORY, United States Naval Institute April 1997, Page 40 Contributed by George Winter pbycat@bellsouth.net
A BIT OF HISTORY: "..."If These Planes Could Talk" from the November-December 2000 edition of Naval Historical Center - Naval Aviation News..." Contributed by Mahlon K. Miller mkwsmiller@cox.net [07MAR2001]
IF THESE PLANES COULD TALK
 VQ-1 P-3 BUNO: 153433
The “Boneyard” is a place of antiques and historic symbolism, a burial ground for aircraft. On 6 December 1999, P-3 Orion side number PR-44 (buno 153433), inset, one of many aircraft used by Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron (VQ) 1, brought to a close its life as a logistics support aircraft.
When VQ-1 received PR-44 on 20 August 1991, the aircraft had already accumulated 15,614.8 flight hours, and served well in VQ-1’s tactical reconnaissance mission.
The Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Center (AMARC) aboard Davis-Monthan AFB, Ariz., is the location of the “Boneyard” and PR-44’s final resting place after logging 3,532 flight hours and 9,426 landings at VQ-1. The facility was created in 1946 for storage purposes, and the Air Force used it first to preserve its B-29 bombers. It wasn’t until 18 years later that the Navy began using the facility for aircraft storage.
After an aging or retired aircraft is inducted into the inventory at AMARC, it goes through a complete system check. This involves removing or setting safeties for all explosive devices and removal of all classified gear, which is stored in a vault on site. AMARC personnel eventually put in 10/10 oil, give it a power turn and spray preservative on the exterior.
“The aircraft is like a person in the military. It lives and works for 20 years or longer and when it gets too old, it retires," said AMARC’s Senior Chief Brooks. But to some, the place is more than a retirement community for aircraft. It holds sentimental value. “There are many things one remembers by just looking at an old airplane,” Brook’s added, “such as a squadron you were in or people you knew. There are many memories attached to just one bird.”
Now PR-44 waits with 5,000 other aircraft to be used again, either for war reserves, foreign military sales or government agency purposes. About 25 percent of such aircraft actually return to the fleet.
When the last crew members of PR-44 said goodbye, they left their signatures for posterity, demonstrating that wherever the aircraft ends up they are grateful for the part it played in accomplishing the mission.
Naval Historical Center - Naval Aviation News November-December 2000. Story by AA Jennifer Lewis.
A BIT OF HISTORY: Coming Out of the Shadows Shadows - Back in the old days, O-club bars around the world were populated with fighter pilots who shared many a story about their exploits in car-rier aviation. In those same bars, there was another group of aviators who would not and could not talk about their mission or where their travels had taken them. If a fighter pilot engaged them in 6G hand maneuvers, these aviators could only wonder if the fighter guy knew anything about what their EA-3B or EP-3 had been doing behind the scenes for the battle group. The reconnaissance community avoided attention because it might compromise its mission, possibly endangering the aircraft and the aircrew..." Naval Historical Center, Department Of The Navy, Washington, D. C http://www.history.navy.mil/branches/ [10MAY2001]

1998 Aviation News January/February - VQ-1 Coming Out Of The Shodows 180KB
 "VQ-1 Summary Page"
|